1 / 64

Pediatric Respiratory Emergencies

Pediatric Respiratory Emergencies. Moritz Haager Dr. David Johnson May 09, 2002. Case. 8 mo male w/ 2/7 Hx of URTI Sx and progressively labored breathing Presents w/ tachypnea, indrawing, lethargy, ill looking child 38 0 / 200 / 60 / 88-90% on RA

josie
Télécharger la présentation

Pediatric Respiratory Emergencies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pediatric Respiratory Emergencies Moritz Haager Dr. David Johnson May 09, 2002

  2. Case • 8 mo male w/ 2/7 Hx of URTI Sx and progressively labored breathing • Presents w/ tachypnea, indrawing, lethargy, ill looking child • 380 / 200 / 60 / 88-90% on RA • Dec’d AE and diffuse wheeze bilat., creamy d/c from eyes • ABG: 7.38 / 38 / 51 / 22/ -2 • WBC 14.6 • CXR: peri-bronchial cuffing in RLL

  3. What’s your DDx for wheeze? • Bronchiolitis • Pneumonia • Asthma • Foreign body aspiration • CHF • CF • Pertussis • Anatomic abnormalities

  4. What’s your approach to bronchiolitis? • ABC’s • Oxygen • ?Bronchodilators (which one?) • ?Steroids • ?Antibiotics • Supportive care • Monitor for complications

  5. Bronchiolitis • Common contagious LRTI of infants + young children (0-24 mo) • Usually viral and self-limited illness • RSV (60-90%) • Para-influenza, adenovirus, rhinovirus, influenza • Affects terminal bronchioles  necrosis of ciliated cells  inflammation w/ cellular debris + mucous plugging  wheezing and inc’d WOB • Seasonal epidemics (winter months) • Usually no long-term sequelae but may pre-dispose to (or uncover) asthma

  6. Are bronchodilators useful? • Controversial point in literature • Meta-analysis looking at 15 RCT’s (mostly salbutamol) concluded moderate short-term benefit from bronchodilator therapy, but no effect on admission rate or oximetry • Kellner et al. 1996. Arch Ped Adol Med. 150: 1166-72 • Cochrane systematic review of 394 kids in 8 trials showed 54% improved clinically vs.. 25% of placebo • Concluded modest short-term symptomatic benefit; need more studies to better elucidate utility • Kellner et al. 2002. Coch Data Sys Rev. (1)

  7. Salbutamol or Epinephrine? • 4 RCT’s show epinephrine (racemic or L-epi) as appearing to be superior to salbutamol • All found significant symptomatic improvement, and two found dec’d admission rate or shortened hospital stay; no adverse effects noted • Only 2 were in ED setting • Reijonen et al. 1995. Arch. Ped. Adol. Med. 149: 686-92 • Menon et al. 1995. J. Ped. 126: 1004-007 • Sanchez et al. 1993. J. Ped. 122: 145-51 • Bertrand et al. 2001. Ped. Pulmonolgy. 31: 284-8 • Hartling and Klassen in process of preparing a Cochrane review • Epi appears superior based on current evidence

  8. What about Atrovent? • Double-blind placebo-controlled RCT of 69 infants 6wks – 24 mo w/ acute bronchiolitis • Randomized to either salbutamol + ipratropium or salbutamol + placebo • No sig difference in admission rate, RR, WOB, wheezing, or O2 sats • No additional benefit when given in addition to salbutamol. • Schuh et al. 1992. Pediatrics. 90: 920-23

  9. Is there a role for Steroids? • 3 RCT’s all fail to show benefit • Roosevelt et al. 1990. Lancet. 348: 292-95 • Van Woensel et al. 1997. Thorax. 52: 634-47 • Klassen et al. 1997. J. Ped. 130: 191-196. • 3 more recent studies support this and also fail to show any long-term benefit in reducing risk of post-bronchiolitis wheezing or asthma • Van Woensel et al. 2000. Ped. Pulmonology. 30: 92-6 • Wong et al. 2000. Euro. Resp. J. 15: 388-94 • Cade et al. 2000. Arch. Dis. Child. 82: 126-30 • Literature does not support use in bronchiolitis • Patel et al are preparing a Cochrane review

  10. Does this Kid need Antibiotics? • Not routinely indicated, but • One study shows ~86% of kids w/ bronchiolitis have concomitant OM • 5-10% have M. pneumoniae or Chlamydia co-infection • Consider Tx in kids with: • OM and high fever • Atypical features • More ill than expected • CXR evidence of pneumonia (other than atelectasis) • This child received IV amoxicillin for ill appearance

  11. Your student suggests Ribavirin • Synthetic nucleotide anologue w/ virostatic properties • Expensive, possibly teratogenic, can cause bronchospasm • Controversial, but mounting evidence it does not work: • At least 3 RCT’s fail to show benefit • Everard et al. 2001. Resp. Med. 95: 275-80 • Guerguerin et al. 1999. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. 160: 829-34 • Moler et al. 1996. J. Ped. 128: 422-28 • Cochrane review of 378 infants < 6mo in 10 trials suggests possible decrease in length of stay, but studies lack sufficient power. • Randolph and Wang. 2002. Coch Data Sys Rev. Issue 1 • Bottom line: not indicated in ED

  12. Other Treatments for Bronchiolitis • Shuang huang lian • 1 RCT shows dec’d duration of Sx • Heliox • One RCT in PICU showing benefit • Surfactant • Case reports in PICU setting • ECMO • Case reports of benefit in premies or unstable pts refractory to conventional Tx • Prevention • RSVIG • Palivizumab

  13. What complication can arise? • Hypoxemia / respiratory failure • Apnea (esp. in <6 mo) • Hypercarbia • Pneumonia (viral or bacterial) • Concomitant OM • Long-term: ? Asthma – some studies suggest inc’d risk esp. in kids w/ inc’d IgE Mortality < 1%, and usually occurs in children w/ underlying heart dz, lung dz, or prematurity.

  14. Are there any predictors of M+M? • Predictors of severe disease: • GA < 34 wks • SpO2 < 95% • RR >70 • Age < 3 mo • Ill or toxic appearance • Atelectasis on CXR • Presence or absence of all 6 has PPV of 81% and NPV of 88% for severe course • Shaw et al. 1991. Am. J. Dis. Child. 145: 151-55

  15. Who needs intubation? • 2-7 % of hospitalized infants end up requiring intubation for resp. failure • Indications for intubation: • Severe resp. distress • Apnea • Hypoxia or hypercapnea • Lethargy • Poor perfusion • Metabolic acidosis • Wright et al. 2002. Emerg Med Clin NA. 20: 93-113

  16. Case • 3 yo female presents w/ 3/7 Hx of coryza, fever, and a “harsh” cough • Today started making noise with every breath and hoarse voice which is worse at night • O/E: 386 / 120 / 35 / 96% RA • Inspiratory stridor

  17. What’s your DDx for stridor? • Epiglottitis • Bacterial tracheitis • Retro-pharyngeal abscess • Croup • Uvulitis • Foreign body obstruction • Hemangioma • Neoplasm

  18. What’s your approach to Croup? • ABC’s • Oxygen • ?Humidification • ?Epinephrine • ?Steroids • ?Intubation

  19. Croup • = Laryngotracheobronchitis, viral croup • Common URTI and cause of stridor in infants and children 6 mo – 6 yo • Viral infection  inflammation of subglottic area  stridor (can be biphasic in severe cases)  potentially hypoxia and death (rare) • Biphasic: peaks in fall and winter • Etiology: • Parainfluenza 1 + 3 (>65%) > RSV > Parainfluenza 2 > Influenza A > M. pneumoniae > Influenza B

  20. Humidification: does it work? • Long-standing first-line Tx at home • Anecdotal evidence • studies to date fail to show objective benefit from mist therapy, one of which was an RCT of 16 pts receiving either RA or humidified air • Bourchier et al. 1984. Aust. Pediatr. J. 20:289-91 • Reports of Pseudomonas contamination and hyper-sensitivity reactions • We need a larger RCT to clear this up • Cochrane review by Moore and Little in progress

  21. Epinephrine a- effects: dec’d bronchial secretions + edema b- effects: bronchodilation, tachycardia • Most studies on racemic epinephrine but at least one double-blind RCT suggests equivalence to L-epi • Waisman et al. 1992d. Pediatrics. 89: 302-06 • 0.5 ml 2.25% racemic epinephrine = 5 ml 1:1000 L-epinephrine • L-epi more available and less expensive

  22. Does Epi work in Croup? • 5 prospective double-blind RCT’s of epinephrine in croup • 4 demonstrate decreased airway obstruction with effect lasting 2 hours • Kuusela et al. 1988. Acta Paed. Scand. 77: 99-104 • Taussig et al. 1978. Am J Dis Child 132: 484-87 • Westley et al. 1978. Am J Dis Child 132: 484 • Fogel et al. 1982. J. Ped. 101: 1028-31 • One failed to show any benefit but unsure of length of observation time • Gardner et al. 1973. Pediatrics 52: 52-55 • Epinephrine appears to offer symptomatic benefit

  23. Does Epi help decrease admission? • 3 studies totaling 166 pts who got epi + steroids, observed for 2-3 hrs and then discharged w/ arranged f/u in 48 hrs • 47/50 required no further Tx in one study, while the other 2 were able to D/C 55% and 51% of pts w/ only 1 recurrence of resp. distress in pts who otherwise would have been admitted • Kelly et al. 1992. Am J Emerg 10: 181-83 • Ledwith et al. 1995. Ann Emerg Med 25: 331-37 • Prendergast et al. 1994. Am J Emerg Med. 12: 613-16

  24. How much epi can we safely give? • Studies give 0.05 ml/kg or 0.25-0.5 ml a of 2.25% RE sol’n; don’t often quote frequency • Locally known to give 0.5 ml q2h O/N • Case report of MI in pediatric pt following multiple doses of RE via neb • Developed short run of VT, and mild transient CP • Abnormal ECG and elevated CK-MB • Structurally normal heart as per echo + angio but small infarct seen by nuclear stress scan • Butte et al. 1999. Pediatrics 104: e9 • Suggests we should be more cautious

  25. Steroids • Postulated to work by anti-inflammatory effect to decrease edema, but exact mechanism uncertain • Onset of effect usually quoted as being ~6 hrs, but some have observed effect as early as 2 hrs

  26. Are Steroids useful in Croup? • One meta-analysis comprising 1286 pts in 10 RCT’s and 2 RCT’s quoted as strong evidence demonstrating faster clinical improvement, dec’d likelihood of intubation, and shorter admissions. Also suggests better effect w/ higher doses. • Kairys et al. 1989. Pediatrics. 83: 683-93 • Super et al. 1989. J Ped. 115: 323-29 • Kuusela and Vesikari. 1988. Acta Paed Scand. 77: 99-104 • More recent meta-analysis of 24 RCT’s ( incl. 15 new studies) demonstrates symptomatic improvement, fewer interventions, and shorter hospital stays in steroid-treated children w/ NNT of 5-7, but did not show dec’d risk of intubation • Ausejo et al. 1999. BMJ. 319: 595-600 • Cochrane review concluded CS are effective in relieving the Sx of croup and decreasing need for co-interventions, and length of stay in hospital • Ausejo et al. 2002. Coch Data Sys Rev Issue1

  27. What steroid, what route, what dose? • IM Dexamethasone was shown to be superior to budesonide in one RCT • Johnson et al. 1998. N Engl J med. 339: 498-503 • Dexamethasone can be given IM or PO; no head-to-head comparison studies • Dose more controversial: • Kairys et al: inc’d benefit w/ doses > 0.3 mg/kg • Another double-blind RCT of 120 children concluded a dose of 0.15 mg/kg just as effective • Geelhoed and Macdonald. 1995. Ped Pulmonolgy. 20: 362-68 • No studies have shown any safety concerns or adverse effects with dexamethasone even at doses up to 0.6 mg/kg • Current recommendation is Dex 0.6 mg/kg PO • Ausejo et al. 1999. BMJ. 319: 595-600

  28. Does giving steroids early in the ED affect disposition or Outcome? • At least 4 RCT’s, all suggesting improved clinical status with early steroids • 1 study only had 80% power to detect 67% difference in admission rate • Johnson et al. 1996. Arch Ped Adol Med 150: 349-55 • 2 suggest decreased admission rate • Johnson et al. 1998. N Engl J Med. 339: 498-503 • Klassen et al. 1994. N Engl J Med. 331: 285-89 • 1 study suggest no sig benefit from nebulized budesonide in addition to PO dex • Klassen et al. 1998. JAMA 279: 1629-32 • Steroids early appear to be helpful

  29. Who do you admit? • Most pts can be discharged • Admission for: • Marked distress / ill looking • Hypoxia • Dehydration • Poor Tx response / persistent stridor + other Sx • Other medical co-morbidities (prem, cardiac, pulm) • Young age • Social: far from hospital, questionable f/u, scary story, anxious parents

  30. Who do you intubate? • Very rare since advent of steroids • Use ½ size smaller than calculated • No clear guidelines; exercise clinical judgment

  31. Case • 13 yo boy w/ known asthma presents w/ runny nose, cough, and inc’d SOB • O/E: 373 / 100 / 22 / 96% RA • Mild exp wheezes • PEF 300 compared to usual of 375

  32. What’s your DDx for wheezing? • Asthma • Foreign body • Bronchiolitis • CHF • Anatomic (vascular ring, laryngomalacia..) • CF • Pertussis • Pneumonia

  33. Asthma • Most common chronic dz of children • Rising M + M: mortality doubled 1977-85 • Chronic inflammatory dz characterized by exacerbations + remissions, w/ airway obstruction partially reversible w/ meds • Specific triggers • Goal of ED care is to coordinate w/ existing care plan as much as possible

  34. What’s your approach? • Initial assessment • ABC’s • Initial management • Oxygen, bronchodilators, steroids, • Identify risk factors and assess Tx response • Disposition and F/U

  35. Prior sudden exacerbations Prior intubations / ICU stays >2 admissions in past year >3 ED visits in past yr Admission or ED visit in past month >2 ventolin inhalers per month Currently on, or recent weaning from, steroids Poor perception of airflow obstruction Co-morbid disease Low SE status, urban residence Psychiatric dz Sensitivity to Alternaria Mortality Risk Factors

  36. Clinical Scoring Systems • Most common is pulmonary index • Based on physical exam findings including RR, wheezing, I-E ratio, and use of accessory muscles • None have sufficient validation to be used in disposition decisions

  37. Pulmonary Function Tests • Formal PFT’s are best to measure degree of obstruction but not convenient in ED • PEF commonly used • correlates w/ FEV1 • Effort-dependant, pt needs to stand • Compare w/ personal best or standard tables PEF pred Severity <30% possibly life-threatening <50% severe 50-80% moderate >80% mild

  38. Pulse Oximetry + Oxygen • No official agreement on normal values: • NAEPEP states anyone <90% should get O2 • Common practice in the region is <92% • Acute asthma pts w/ SaO2 <95% were more likely to be admitted and more likely to return to ED if discharged • Geelhoed et al. 1990. J Ped. 117: 907-09 • SaO2 <93% found to be 35% sensitive and 93% specific fro admission • Mayefsky and el_Shianway. 1992. Ped Emerg Care 8: 262-4 • Limitations of pulse oximetry: • Dec’d O2-carrying capacity • Low perfusion state • Provides no information on ventilation

  39. b-agonists • Salbutamol is 1st line therapy in asthma • Epinephrine has no benefit over salbutamol • Klassen et al. 2000. Acad Emerg Med 7: 1097-103 • Mechanism of action: • Relax bronchial smooth muscle • Increase secretion of water from mucous glands • Increase mucociliary clearance • Controversies: • Route of administration in ED • New pure R isomers (levalbuterol) • Continuous therapy

  40. MDI or Nebulizer? • Nebulizers enormously popular in ED • Cost of nebulizer is ~50% greater • Most people use MDI’s at home • 5 studies show either equivalence, or even superiority of MDI over nebulizer • One double-blind RCT in 5-17 yo subjects showed no difference • Schuh et al. 1999. J Ped. 135: 22-27 • Similar study in pts aged 1-4 yo showed dec’d admission rate + less wheezing in MDI group • Leversha et al. 2000. J Ped 136: 497-502 • Ploin et al. 2000. Pediatrics. 106: 311-17 • MDI makes more sense in ED

  41. IV Salbutamol • Few well designed trials • Cardiotoxicity: need to monitor cardiac funxn + K+ • Rationale: may get to non-ventilated lung areas • One double-blind RCT of IV salbutamol in addition to continuous nebulized salbutamol showed more rapid improvement than control group • Did not follow cardiac enzymes • Browne et al. 1997. Lancet. 349: 301-305 • Current recommendation is to consider early on in severe Tx-refractory cases

  42. Continuous b-agonist therapy • Usually administered as 0.5 mg/kg/h , to a maximum of 15 mg • Requires cardiopulmonary monitoring • some studies (mostly adult) showing improved asthma scores, but no difference in PEF’s, admission rates, or adverse effects • Besbes-Ouanes et al. 2000. Ann Emerg Med 36:198-203 • Jury still out – may consider if tx-refractory

  43. Levalbuterol • Salbutamol (albuterol) = R + S isomers • R isomer  bronchodilation • S isomer  bronchoconstriction • Manifests clinically as tolerance after repeated use • Levalbuterol is pure R isomer • ~5x cost of salbutamol • One double-blind crossover study of 33 kids suggests better than or equivalent to salbutamol w/ less side effects, but in stable pts (not ED setting) • Gawchik et al. 1999. J Allergy Clin Immunol 103: 615-21 • No head-to-head trials in ED setting • Not indicated for use at this time; needs further study

  44. Anti-Cholinergics • Ipratropium bromide • Similar to atropine; bromide group prevents systemic effect • Inhibits Ach-mediated bronchoconstriction • Only useful in addition to b-agonist • Takes 60-90 min to reach peak effect • Given as 250 mg x3 doses or 500 mg x2 doses by nebulizer over 1 hour; repeat q2-4h prn • One meta-analysis and a Cochrane review show: • Multiple doses (but not single doses) decrease admissions in mod - severe exacerbations w/ NNT of 12 • No conclusive evidence for use in mild-moderate cases • Plotnick and Ducharme. 1998. BMJ. 317: 971-977 • Plotnick and Ducharme. 2002. Coch Data Sys Rev. Issue 1 • NAEPP: use in severely ill kids, and those not responding to high dose b-agonist therapy

  45. Steroids • Meta-analysis of 30 RCT’s + recent Cochrane review show: • Early steroids dec’d admission rates (NNT = 8) • IV = PO in efficacy; no significant adverse effects • Rowe et al. 1992. Am J Emerg Med. 10: 301-310 • Rowe et al 2002. Coch Data Sys Rev. Issue 1 • Speed resolution of obstruction • Potentiate effects of b-agonists • Steroids prevent relapse w/ NNT 13, and decrease need for b-2 agonists • Rowe et al 2002. Coch Data Sys Rev. Issue 1 • Indicated for most pts in ED

More Related