1 / 11

SeaWinds Flag Category Plots Analysis

Explore the performance metrics based on flag categories and wind speed ranges. Candidates' impact levels and detection rates are analyzed to select the most efficient candidate for flagging. Dive into the data to understand the implications.

kaiyo
Télécharger la présentation

SeaWinds Flag Category Plots Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SeaWinds IMUDH Flag Choice Bryan Stiles Jan.17, 2006

  2. Candidates • All candidates use the same MUDH table computed from > 2m/s speed impact (negative speed impacts not flagged) OR > 15 degrees direction • Candidate 1: 1.7% flagged • Inner 51% misdetection • Outer 55% misdetection • Candidate 2: 1.9% flagged CHOSEN CANDIDATE • Inner 48% misdetection • Outer 52% misdetection • Candidate 3: 2.3% flagged • Inner 43% misdetection • Outer 47% misdetection • Candidate 4: 3.2% flagged • Inner 35% misdetection • Outer 35% misdetection

  3. Flag Category Plots • The following slides present performance metrics as a function of flag category and wind speed range • Flag category • Category 1: Flagged by 1.7% candidate • Category 2: Flagged by 1.9% but not 1.7% • Category 3: Flagged by 2.3% but not 1.9% • Category 4: Flagged by 3.2% but not 2.3% • Category 5: Not Flagged by 3.2% candidate

More Related