1 / 53

Local Control Accountability Plan Update: Working With Stakeholders and County Review

Local Control Accountability Plan Update: Working With Stakeholders and County Review. A Gift of More Local Control. Outcomes. Review LCAP purposes. Review SBE approved template and spending regulations and implications. Sharing data with stakeholders. What are we asking stakeholders?

katy
Télécharger la présentation

Local Control Accountability Plan Update: Working With Stakeholders and County Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Local Control Accountability Plan Update: Working With Stakeholders and County Review

  2. A Gift of More Local Control

  3. Outcomes • Review LCAP purposes. • Review SBE approved template and spending regulations and implications. • Sharing data with stakeholders. • What are we asking stakeholders? • County contacts. • Implementation Framework and county review.

  4. Local Control Accountability Plan • Annual Goals That Address Eight Specified Priority Areas • Districtwide goals. • Goals for each subgroup; school. • Specific Actions to Achieve Goals • Each action must be aligned with budget. • Input and Review Process • Advisory groups review and comment. • LEA responds to groups’ comments in writing.

  5. Janelle’s Key Points • LCFF changes focus from compliance to performance. • LCAP describes what you will do for kids and what you will spend to do so. • Performance driven - what do all kids need and how will you meet their needs. • Local Planning - tells the local story to stakeholders based on the local needs and goals –

  6. Advice from Janelle’s WestEd Colleagues • “Telling the Story” is like a grant introduction or justification. Stakeholders as audience. It’s like an elevator speech. Who are we -- our values, our priorities, our stakeholders and partners. How we plan to address our needs. How we’ll invest the funds. How the system will support it. How did we get it done?

  7. Priorities May Be Grouped for “Goal” Purposes A. Conditions of Learning • Basic Services • Implementation of State Standards • Course Access B. Pupil Outcomes • Pupil Achievement • Other Pupil Outcomes • Engagement • Parent Involvement • Pupil Engagement • School Climate

  8. Districts Counties Charters Significant subgroup now defined as 30. Significant subgroup Foster youth defined as 15.

  9. Template Categories3-Year LCAP 1. Stakeholder Engagement • Guides the process planning for development of LCAP. • See guiding questions. • Likely will be completed after LCAP sections 2-3 are complete. • Is NOT the narrative for state priority 3, Parent Involvement.

  10. Template Categories 3-Year LCAP 1. Stakeholder Engagement • Needs Analysis: • Guiding question 3- What information was made available to stakeholders related to the state priorities and used by the LEA to inform the LCAP goal setting process? Qualitative and Quantitative

  11. Needs Analysis

  12. KDS Surveys

  13. On Gathering Input • Don’t ask for input that you don’t plan to use. • Ask questions relevant to your story or your data. • What is your process for reviewing processing and feeding back your input to your stakeholders?

  14. What are Districts Asking? • Temecula Valley: How can TVUSD help more… 1. Students to attend school regularly? 2. Students to do well in their classes? 3. Students to graduate from high school? 4. Students to prepare for college and careers? 5. Parents to become involved in our schools?

  15. Essential Questions From Madera County • What steps might we continue or implement to: • Close achievement gaps? • Provide college and career readiness? • Achieve master of 21st century learning skills? • Ensure all students graduate? • Promote positive learning environments? • Expand parent involvement?

  16. What are Districts Asking?

  17. KDS Surveys

  18. LCAP Next Steps • Create a Timeline of Events • Establish Districtwide Committees • Analyze Student Achievement Data • Know Research • Educate Learning Community on LCFF and LCAP • Establish LCAP Goals • Begin Aligning Budget With LCAP

  19. Focus Group Questions • In small, grade span alike groups: • What two things do you want most for your child? • What do parents need to know most about this? • What are the best ways to get parents engaged in this new opportunity?

  20. Small Group Discussion • How are you engaging your stakeholders? • What are you asking your stakeholders? • How are you maximizing attendance? • How are you reviewing and processing and feeding back your input to stakeholders?

  21. Template Categories3-Year LCAP Needs (data) Analysis 2. Goals and Progress Indicators 8 state priorities; all students + subgroups; schools • District identifies metric and the progress projected (target). • Quantitative or qualitative • One goal can fit multiple state priorities

  22. Getting Ready to Write • Does your writing team have a common understanding of terms such as: • “Annual update” • “Metric” • “Different/Improved” • “State Priorities”/”LEA priorities”, “LEA goals” • “Actions and Services” • “Performance Indicators”

  23. Template Categories3-Year LCAP 3. Actions, Services, and Expenditures • Budget references include all funding sources to implement action/service. • Actions, services, and expenditures for ALL pupils and subgroups not listed in B. • Actions and services above and beyond what is provided for All Students that serve low income, EL, foster youth, and RFEP.

  24. Template Categories3-Year LCAP • Actions, Services, and Expenditures • Description of calculation of concentration funds, how the funds are being expended that year, justification for schoolwide or districtwide use.

  25. Template Categories3-Year LCAP • Actions, Services, and Expenditures • Description of how services for subgroups identified under (B) are increased or improved in proportion to the increased funding and as compared to services provided to all pupils.

  26. SBE Approved Spending Regulations

  27. SBE Proportionality Scenario

  28. Disconnect in Funding? • If “districtwide” means a district may spend LCFF funds (concentration and supplemental) on all students-- how does a district reconcile or meet a proportionality figure?

  29. Deadline • On or before July 1, 2014 (By June 2014), LEA Board Approval at same meeting and prior to the Budget Approval. • Due to RCOE by July 1, 2014, or 5 days after board approval, whichever is sooner.

  30. Solicit written comments from public. Respond in writing to comments from advisory committees. Present proposed plan to parent advisory committees for review and comment. Adopt Plan at subsequent public meeting. Develop proposed plan. 52062.a(4): superintendent shall review school plans and ensure that the specific actions included in the LCAP are consistent with the strategies included in the school plans Must be adopted by July 1, 2014 Governing Board solicits recommendations and comments from public at public hearing. Consult with school employees, parents, students and local bargaining units. LCAP actions must be consistent with local bargaining agreements.

  31. If County Superintendent seeks clarification, budget approval is conditional

  32. COE reviews plan content and alignment of budget. Seeks clarification about contents of plan from district by August 15. Submits locally approved plan to COE five days after adoption. COE reviews plan clarification. Responds to COE request for clarification within 15 days. Submits recommended amendments to plan back to district within 15 days. COE reviews plan amendments. Considers COE recommendations in a public hearing within 15 days. Reviews plan to determine if it meets requirements (adheres to SBE Template and aligns with district budget). If plan meets requirements, approves plan by October 8. If plan does not meet requirements, does not approve plan; provides support.

  33. TEAM WORKING DATES: June 24-26, 2014 July 7-11, 2014 July 15-31, 2014 (Directors Only) Our Review Process

  34. Our Review Process TEAM WORKING DATES: June 24-26, 2014 July 7-11, 2014 July 15-31, 2014 (Directors Only)

  35. Solicit written comments from public. Respond in writing to comments from advisory committees. Present proposed plan to parent advisory committees for review and comment. Adopt Plan at subsequent public meeting. Develop proposed plan. 52062.a(4): superintendent shall review school plans and ensure that the specific actions included in the LCAP are consistent with the strategies included in the school plans Must be adopted by July 1, 2014 Governing Board solicits recommendations and comments from public at public hearing. Consult with school employees, parents, students and local bargaining units. LCAP actions must be consistent with local bargaining agreements.

  36. LCAP Development Assistance Riverside/ Alvord/ Jurupa Contact: Cynthia Woods cwoods@rcoe.us; 951-826-6101 Murrieta/ Temecula Contact: Diana Asseier dasseier@rcoe.us; 951-826-6648 Coachella/ Palm Springs/ Desert Sands Contact: Mike Barney mbarney@rcoe.us; 951-826-6304 Palo Verde/ Desert Center/Menifee Contact: Dennis Large dlarge@rcoe.us; 951-826-6220 Banning/ Beaumont/ San Jacinto Contact: Barbara Howard bhoward@rcoe.us; 951-826-6632 Corona/ Lake Elsinore/ Val Verde/ RCOE Contact: Russ Frank rfrank@rcoe.us; 951-826-6601 RCEA/ CBK/ Imagine/Gateway/ RiverSprings Contact: Diana Asseier dasseier@rcoe.us; 951-826-6648 Perris High/ Perris El/ Romoland Contact: Hilma Griffin-Watson hgriffin-watson@rcoe.us ; 951-826-6120 Hemet/ Nuview/ Moreno Valley Contact: Ron Vito rvito@rcoe.us; 951-826-6797

  37. REVIEW STRUCTURE • Level 1- Expert Team Review by the priority areas. • Level 2- Whole Plan Review by district. • Level 3- Directors’ Final Review and Response to district.

  38. Flexibility…Accountability GOAL: Every Student College and Career Ready • How can we assist our districts in increasing achievement for all students? Systems ensuring successful implementation of actions and sustainability of impact. • What does the Research say?

  39. Implementation Science Stages of Implementation Drivers of Implementation

  40. Implementation Science • Level 1- Expert Team Review by the priority areas. • Lens for Plan Review • Ensure goals are based on Needs Analysis. • Ensure Goals and Actions will result in progress indicated based on identified metric. • Ensure Actions are research-based. GOAL: Increased achievement for all students; every student college and career ready.

  41. Implementation Science An in depth view of the research based “Lens”

  42. Competency Drivers http://www.touchpointdashboard.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/measure.jpg

  43. TEAM WORKING DATES: • June 24-26, 2014 • Teams review plans by priority areas. • July 7-11, 2014 • Teams review “whole” plans by district. • District “contacts” facilitate district LCAP review. • July 15-31, 2014 • ES and FS Directors conduct final LCFF/LCAP review. • Generate summary and recommendations.

  44. TEAM WORKING DATES: • July 31 – August 10, 2014 Cabinet generates letters • Approved. • Conditional approval based on clarification needed on budget or plan. • Not approved (provides technical assistance).

  45. Through each replication, we become more clear in our implementation efforts. http://zerobearblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/this-duck-business-is-for-birds.html

More Related