1 / 28

Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion - A First Comparison

Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion - A First Comparison. Tracker Upgrade Power WG Meeting October 7 th , 2008. Katja Klein 1. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen University. Outline. Compare Serial Powering & DC-DC conversion under various aspects Power loss in cables

keefe
Télécharger la présentation

Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion - A First Comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion - A First Comparison Tracker Upgrade Power WG Meeting October 7th, 2008 Katja Klein 1. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen University

  2. Outline • Compare Serial Powering & DC-DC conversion under various aspects • Power loss in cables • Local efficiency • Compatibility with services • Power supplies • Bias voltage • Safety • Slow control • Start-up • Scalability • Flexibility • Potential to deliver different voltages • Process considerations & radiation hardness • Interplay with FE-chip • Interplay with readout & controls • Noise • Material budget • Space • Test systems • Discussion Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  3. The Basic Ideas • Serial powering • Powered from constant current source • Each module is on different ground potential  AC-coupled communication • Shunt regulator and transistor to take excess current and stabilize voltage • Voltages are created locally via shunt and linear regulators • Parallel powering with DC-DC conversion • Need radiation-hard magnetic field tolerant DC-DC converter • One converter per module or parallel scheme • 1-step or 2-step conversion Vdrop = RI0 Pdrop = RI02 Conversion ratio r: r= Vout/ Vin ! << 1 Pdrop = RI02n2r2 Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  4. The Buck Converter The “buck converter“ is simplest inductor-based step-down converter: Convertion ratio g > 1: g = Vin / Vout Switching frequency fs: fs = 1 / Ts Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  5. The Charge Pump • Capacitor-based design • Step-down: capacitors charged in series and discharged in parallel • Conversion ration = 1 / number of parallel capacitors • Low currents Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  6. Implementation Examples Serial powering: PP with DC-DC conversion: Atlas pixels, Tobias Stockmanns Stefano Michelis, TWEPP2008 • Two-stage system • Diff. technologies proposed for the two stages • Analogue and digital power fully separated • Power for optical links ~ integrated • HV not integrated • Regulators on-chip or on the hybrid • AC-coupled communication with off-module electronics • Power for optical links not integrated • HV not integrated Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  7. What Conversion Ratio do we need? Conversion ratio needed for parallel powering with DC-DC converters? • Total tracker current estimate • Current strip tracker: 15kA; current pixel: 1.5kA • Geoffs strawman: strips: 25kW/1.2V = 21kA; pixels: 3.2kA; trigger layers: 10kA • Currents increase roughly by factor of 2 in this strawman • Power loss in cables • Goes with I2 increase by factor of 4 for same number of cables (2000) • Total power loss inverse proportional to number of power groups • Can compensate with (conversion ratio)2 • Material budget • Saving in cable x-section scales with I • Total material independent of segmentation • Of course want to reduce as much as possible With conversion ratio of ¼ we would be as good as or better than today. SP: current fixed; cable material & power loss depends only on # of cables! Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  8. Power Losses in Cables • Power losses in cables lead to decrease of overall power efficiency  expensive • ... increase the heat load within the cold volume  cooling capacity must be higher • Consider system with n modules: Pdet = nI0V0 • Voltage drop on cables & power loss Pcable calculated within each scheme • Efficiency = Pdet / Ptotal = Pdet / (Pdet + Pcable) DC-DC, r = 1/10 SP DC-DC, r = 1/5 • PP with DC-DC conversion • Eff. goes down with n. Need more cables or lower conversion ratio • Equal to SP if conversion ratio = 1/n • Serial powering • Eff. increases with n. Since 10-20 modules can be chained, efficiency can be very high! Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  9. Local Efficiency • Serial powering • Constant current source  total power consumption is contant! • Current of chain is fixed to highest current needed by any member • Current not used by a module flows through shunt regulator • Linear regulator: voltage difference between dig. & analog drops across it • Local power consumption is increased! • Estimated increase for - Atlas pixels (NIM A557): 35% - Atlas strips (NIM A579, ABCD): 18% • PP with DC-DC conversion • All DC-DC converters have inefficiencies • switching losses • ESR of passive components • Ron of transistor etc. • Typical values (e.g. comm. buck): 80-95% • Efficiency goes down for low conv. ratio! • Trade-off betw. eff. & switching frequency • In two-step schemes, efficiencies multiply • Estimates (St. Michelis, TWEPP2008): • Step-1: 85-90% • Step-2: 93% • Total: 80-85% • This needs to be demonstrated Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  10. Compatibility with LIC Cables • Constraints from recycling of current services: • 2000 LICs with two LV conductors & common return each  Not realistic to split return to obtain 4000 lines •  Stay with 2000 LV power lines (“power groups“) • LV conductors certified for 30V and 20A • Twisted pairs (HV/T/H/sense) certified for 600V • 256 PLCC control power cables • Adapt at PP1 to (lower mass) cables inside tracker • Serial powering • Current is small • 30V allows for chains with more than 20 modules •  looks compatible • PP with DC-DC conversion • 30V is largely enough • For any reasonable segmentation and conv. factor currents should be lowere.g. 20 chips a 53mA per module  1.2A / module 20 modules per rod  24A /rod r = ¼  I = 6A •  looks compatible Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  11. Power Supplies • Assume that power supplies will be exchanged after 10 years • PP with DC-DC conversion • Standard PS: ~15V, ~10A (radiation & magnetic field tolerant?) • Any sensitivity of converter to input voltage ripple? • No sensing needed (local regulation)? • Serial powering • Constant current source • Not so common in industry (e.g. CAEN) • Atlas: PSs developed by Prague group (developed already their current PSs) • No sensing Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  12. Bias Voltage • Power is not a problem (currents are very low) • Up to now: independent bias lines for 1-2 modules • Might not be possible anymore when current cables are re-used • Note: T/H/sense wires are equal to HV wires • Serial powering • Not yet well integrated into concept • Derive on-module via step-up converters? In Atlas, piezo-electric transformers are discussed. • Or independent delivery using todays cables • PP with DC-DC conversion • Same options as for SP Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  13. Safety (I) • Serial powering • Open leads to loss of whole chain • Shunt regulators/transistors to cope with this • Several concepts are on the market (next page) • Connection to module can break  bypass transistor on mothercable- high V, high I  rad.-hardness? - must be controlable from outside • Real-time over-current protection? • Real time over-voltage protection? • PP with DC-DC conversion • Open connections • Converter itself can break • Shorts between converter and module • If PP of several mod.s by one converter: risk to loose several modules at once • Fermilab expressed interest to perform a systematic failure analysis Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  14. Safety (II) Shunt regulators + transistors parallel on-chip (Atlas pixels)+ redundancy- matching issue at start-up Regulator with lowest threshold voltage conducts first all current goes through this regulator spread in threshold voltage and internal resistance must be small One shunt regulator + transistor per module+ no matching issue- no redundany- needs high-current shunt transistor- must stand total voltage One reg. per module + distributed transistors+ no matching issue+ some redundancy- feedback more challenging Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  15. Slow Control • Module voltage(s) • Module current(s)? • Bias current • Serial powering • Slow control IC or block on hybrid • Could be used to communicate with linear regulator and turn to stand-by • Ideas to sense module voltage in Atlas pixels: - sense potential through HV return - sense through AC-coupled data-out termination - sense from bypass transistor gate • PP with DC-DC conversion • Slow control IC or block on hybrid • For on-chip charge pump: would be useful to have SC information from individual chips • Could be used to set converter output voltage and switch on/off converters Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  16. Start-up & Selective Powering • Serial powering • If controls powered from separate line, it can be switched on first • Devices in chain switched on together (both module controller and FE-chips) • Can take out modules only by closing bypass transistor from outside • PP with DC-DC conversion • If converter output can be switched on/off, then easy and flexible: - controls can be switched on first - bad modules (chips?) can be switched off - groups of chips/modules can be switched on/off for tests • This should be a requirement! Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  17. Scalability • Consequences if more modules are powered per chain or in parallel? E.g. barrel vs. end caps: different # of modules per substructure • Serial powering • Current is independent on # of modules • Number of modules reflected in maximal voltage within chain; relevant for • capacitors for AC-coupling • constant current source • bypass / shunt transistors • PP with DC-DC conversion • If one converter per module: perfect scalability • PP of several mod. by one converter: current depends on # of modules, must be able to power largest group • Should specify soon what we need • current per chip • # of chips per module • # of modules per substructure • Otherwise we will be constraint by currents that devices can provide Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  18. Flexibility • Flexibility with respect to combination of devices with different currents • E.g. trigger vs. standard module (or 4 / 6-chips) • PP with DC-DC conversion • If one converter per module: very flexible, do not care! • If PP of several modules by one converter: distribution between modules arbitrary • Serial powering • Current of chain is equal to highest current needed by any member chains with mixed current requirements are inefficient! Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  19. Potential to Provide Different Voltages • Chip supply voltage(es): ~ 1.2V (Atlas: 0.9V for digital part to save power) • Opto-electronics supply voltage: 2.5 – 3V • Serial powering • Needed voltage created by regulators • ~1.2V by shunt regulator • Lower voltage derived from this via linear regulator  efficiency loss • Technically could power opto-electronics and controls via own regulators, but inefficient to chain devices with different current consumption • Decouple from chain (Atlas: plan to power separately from dedicated cables) • PP with DC-DC conversion • With charge pumps, only integer conversion ratios are possible • With inductor-based designs, arbitrary Vout < Vin can be configured (but feedback circuit optimized for a certain range) • Only hard requirement: Vin >= Vopto • Analogue and digital voltage can be supplied independently no efficiency loss Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  20. Process Considerations & Radiation Hardness • Serial powering • Regulators must be rad.-hard • Standard CMOS process can be used; but... • HV tolerant components (up to nU0): - capacitors for AC-coupling - bypass transistor • Shunt transistors must stand high currents (~2A) if one per module • PP with DC-DC conversion • Commercial devices are not rad.-hard • Apparent exception: Enpirion EN5360 (S. Dhawan, TWEPP2008) • Standard 130nm CMOS: 3.3V maximal • For high conversion ratio transistors must tolerate high Vin , e.g. 12V • Several “high voltage“ processes exist • Rad.-hard HV process not yet identified • This is a potential show stopper • For r = ½ (e.g. charge pump) can use 3.3V transistors - radiation hardness? Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  21. Interplay with FE-Chip • PP with DC-DC conversion • Ideally fully decoupled • Not true anymore in two-step approach with on-chip charge pump • Next Atlas strip FE-chip (ABCnext): - linear regulator to filter switching noise • Next Atlas pixel chip (FE-I4): - LDO - Charge pump (r = ½) • No influence on protocol • Serial powering • Several options for shunt - Regulator and transistor on-chip - Only shunt transistor on-chip - Both external • Linear regulators typically on-chip • Next Atlas strip FE-chip (ABCnext): - linear regulator - shunt regulator circuit - shunt transistor circuit • Next Atlas pixel chip (FE-I4): - Shunt regulator - LDO • DC-balanced protocol Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  22. Readout & Controls • Serial powering • Modules are on different potentials AC-coupling to off-module electronics needed • Decoupling either on the hybrid (needs space for chips & capacitors) or at the end of the rod (Atlas strips, P. Phillips, TWEPP08) • Needs DC-balanced protocol increase of data volume • PP with DC-DC conversion • Nothing special: electrical transmission of data and communication signals to control ICs • No DC-balanced protocol needed Atlas pixels, NIM A557 Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  23. Noise • Serial powering • Intrinsically clean - current is kept constant - voltages generated locally • Main concerns: - pick-up from external source - pick-up from noisy module in chain • Tests by Atlas pixels (digital) and strips (binary) revealed no serious problems - noise injection - modules left unbiased - decreased detection thresholds - external switchable load in parallel to one module (changes potential for all modules): some effect (Atlas pixels, NIM A557) • PP with DC-DC conversion • Switching noise couples conductively into FE • Radiated noise (actually magnetic near-field) is picked up by modules • Details depend on FE, distances, filtering, coil type & design, switching frequency, conversion ratio, ... • Shielding helps against radiated noise, but adds material, work and cost • LDO helps against conductive noise, but reduces efficiency • Surprises might come with bigger systems • Not good to start already with shielding and system-specific fine-tuning Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  24. Material Budget • Serial powering • Regulators ~ one add. chip per hybrid • Components for AC-coupling - HV-safe capacitors (might be big!) - LVDS chip • Flex for discrete components • Cable cross-section from PP1 to detector (rest stays) scales with current - One cable must carry I0 - Total mass depends on modules / cable • Motherboard/-cable: power planes can be narrow, small currents & voltages created locally • PP with DC-DC conversion • Converter chip(s) • Discrete components - air-core inductor (D = 1-2cm!) - output filter capacitor(s) • Flex for discrete components • One cable must carry I0nr  total mass depends only on conv. ratio • Motherboard/-cable - buck converter can tolerate certain voltage drop since input voltage must not be exact  low mass - charge pumps have no output regulation: need exact Vin • Shielding? Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  25. Space • Serial powering • Different options are discussed, but regulators + shunt transistors are either in readout chip or in a separate chip ~ one additional chip per hybrid • Components for AC-coupling - LVDS buffers - HV-safe capacitors (might be big) • Bypass transistor? • PP with DC-DC conversion • Charge pump in readout chip or in a separate chip • Buck converter: - controller chip - discrete air-core inductor (D = 1-2cm!) - discrete output filter capacitor(s) - more? very unlikely to be ever fully on-chip • In all other inductor-based topologies more components (inductors!) needed Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  26. Test Systems for Construction Phase • Serial powering • If AC-coupling at end of stave, a decoupling board is necessary to read out single modules • Adapter PCB needed anyway for electrical readout • PP with DC-DC conversion • Electrical readout of single modules possible with adapter PCB Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  27. Work on Powering within CMS Tracker • RWTH Aachen (L. Feld)– proposal accepted • System test measurements with commercial and custom DC-DC (buck) converters • Simulation of material budget of powering schemes • Rad.-hard magnetic-field tolerant buck converter in collaboration with CERN group • Bristol university (C. Hill)– proposal accepted • Development of PCB air-core toroid • DC-DC converter designs with air-core transformer • PSI (R. Horisberger)– no proposal, but private communication • Development of on-chip CMOS step-down converter (charge pump) • IEKP Karlsruhe (W. de Boer) – proposal under review • Powering via cooling pipes • Fermilab / Iowa / Mississippi (S. Kwan) – proposal under review • System test measurements focused on pixel modules (DC-DC conversion & SP) • Power distribution simulation software Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

  28. Summary • Both schemes have their pros and cons – how to weigh them? • SP is complicated, but I do not see a real show stopper • DC-DC conversion is straightforward, but two potential show stoppers • noise, radiation-hardness of HV-tolerant process • Need to understand SP better • In particular safety, slow controls • Up to now, we focus on DC-DC conversion – should we start on SP? Who? • Both Atlas pixels and strips integrate power circuitry in their new FE-chips: shunt regulators, charge pump, LDO • Seems to be a good approach - can we do the same? Serial Powering vs. DC-DC Conversion

More Related