1 / 5

Venue: Bolzano eMayor Clustering Event Author(s): D.Polemi, J Gamper, P. Hengeveld Organisations: Deloitte Date: 0

Electronic and Secure Municipal Administration for European Citizens eMayor. Secure Information Processing in the Public Sector (SIPPS). Venue: Bolzano eMayor Clustering Event Author(s): D.Polemi, J Gamper, P. Hengeveld Organisations: Deloitte Date: 04/03/2005.

keefe
Télécharger la présentation

Venue: Bolzano eMayor Clustering Event Author(s): D.Polemi, J Gamper, P. Hengeveld Organisations: Deloitte Date: 0

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Electronic and Secure Municipal Administration for European Citizens eMayor Secure Information Processing in the Public Sector (SIPPS) Venue: Bolzano eMayor Clustering Event Author(s): D.Polemi, J Gamper, P. Hengeveld Organisations:Deloitte Date: 04/03/2005

  2. Agenda for The clustering event • 10:30-10:45 Welcome, agenda and objectives of the meeting, Dr. Pim Hengeveld • 10:45-12:30 Secure e-Government Platforms, Services and StandardsChair: Prof. Reinhard Riedl, University of Zurich, Switzerland • Short presentations by eMayor and other FP6 security projects about various security issues in e-government • Preliminary results of an investigation on the status of eSecurity in a benchmark study with European Municipalities and the eMayor approach to Secure IT for Government Pim Hengeveld, Deloitte • Contrubutions by eGov, Security and other projects

  3. Contributions • (Project TrustComLorenzo D. Martino, University of Milan, Italy) • Project COPRASBart Brusse, Belgium • Project IntelcitiesKrassimira Paskaleva, Karlsruhe Research Center, Germany and Thanos Karantjias, Expertnet, Greece, Mrs. M. Brugi, Siena • (Project TIRAMISUSamuel Pescara, Optibase Ltd., Israel) • Project FIDISAlain Rollier, AXSionics Ltd., Switzerland • (Project BioSecOrestes Sanchez Benavente, Networks & Services Security Telefonica I+D, Spain) • Project GUIDEFelix Akeret, Siemens Switzerland Ldt., Switzerland • Project SecurE-JusticeStefano Somaschini, Project Automation S.p.A.,

  4. Agenda (ctnd) • 12:30-13:30 Lunch • 13:30-15:00 Round Table and Panel Discussion • Chair: Prof. Nineta PolemiPanelists: David Basin (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), Paolo Boscolo (Municipality of Prato, Italy),Christos Douligeris (University of Pireaus, Greece)Prof. Ricieri (Milan) • The main research issues are to be discussed in five minute statements by the panel: • Organizational Goals and Problems • Technical Problems • Legal Issues/Policies/Standards • Proposed Research Issues • 15:00-15:30 Coffee Break • 15:30-16:30 Clustering Opportunities and ConclusionsChair: Prof. Nineta Polemi

  5. Objectives of the Meeting • The overall objective of the eMayor clustering event is to bring together the knowledge and experience gained from other 6FP projects, to explore potential synergies, and to identify interest from the European research community in the technological aspects of secure e-government services. More specifically, we address a number of problems, questions, and research issues about secure e-government services for SMGOs, including the following ones: • Organizational Goals and Problems • Legal Issues/Policies/Standards • Technical Problems • Proposed Research Issues in Administrative Knowledge Processes • These questions and problems are relevant for other projects as well and deserve a discussion in a broader context. The meeting gives the opportunity to discuss these questions in a broader context, to present answers from the viewpoint and experience of different projects, to get a more comprehensive view of the problems, to get a common understanding, to indicate directions for standards, etc.

More Related