1 / 8

NGAC GEOLOCATION PRIVACY

Subcommittee Status Report December 11, 2013. NGAC GEOLOCATION PRIVACY. Geolocation Privacy Guidance.

kgunn
Télécharger la présentation

NGAC GEOLOCATION PRIVACY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Subcommittee Status Report December 11, 2013 NGACGEOLOCATION PRIVACY

  2. Geolocation Privacy Guidance • The subject of geolocation privacy is a complex and multi-faceted issue that has potential impacts on multiple sectors of the geospatial community. The NGAC Privacy Subcommittee is asked to provide a brief paper summarizing the key issues of concern related to geolocation privacy from the perspective of the non-Federal geospatial community.* * October 2013 FGDC Guidance to NGAC

  3. Subcommittee Membership • Chair: Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz • Members: Keith Clarke, Matthew Gentile, Doug Richardson, Tony Spicci, Molly Vogt • Support: Bob Austin, John Mahoney, Tricia Gibbons

  4. Activities • Subcommittee Webinars Wednesday, November 20, 2013 and Tuesday, December 3, 2013 • Brainstorming • Discussion • Reviewed NGAC materials from September 2012 Spotlight Session and Geolocation Privacy briefing paper

  5. Key Issues Brainstorm: Geolocation Privacy • No clear federal policy or policy lead • Lack of common or accepted definition – the beginning, maybe a start from the community then get the specific communities and privacy folks involved. Will provide focus – working definition to get the discussion started. • Term “privacy” is so cross-cutting, impacting legal, health, etc. Affects many different programs. What can NGAC address?

  6. Key Issues Brainstorm: Geolocation Privacy • What about the context – natural resource, health, national security, archeology, etc. Level of concern may impact level of privacy needed. • Consider inventorying communities that would have a vested interest. • Need to go to a fair policy with interests involved. What are the elements of a clear, fair geolocation privacy policy? • Consider exploring the issue from multiple perspectives – technical as well as policy solutions

  7. Key Findings/Learnings • This is an enormous subject • Need to narrow subject for NGAC consideration • Need to engage with the larger community

  8. Next Steps • Review Gellman’s fair privacy policy elements • Sept 2012 NGAC meeting. • Consider inventorying specific communities with an interest in geolocation privacy issues (e.g., State and local government organizations) to examine approaches and best practices. • Determine concern, definition, technical solutions, or policy with respect to geolocation privacy issues. • Consider exploring technical solutions to address geolocation privacy concerns • Consider a spotlight session in upcoming NGAC meeting

More Related