1 / 15

A PREFATORY NOTE

IDEALISM Ideas are to be considered on their own merit and not as derivative of prior conditions. What we believe basically reflects the advance of progress and reason, and so does not have “hidden” preferents. MATERIALISM

khamdan
Télécharger la présentation

A PREFATORY NOTE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IDEALISM Ideas are to be considered on their own merit and not as derivative of prior conditions. What we believe basically reflects the advance of progress and reason, and so does not have “hidden” preferents. MATERIALISM Ideas reflect the material (economic) conditions in which they were formed Our ideas about who we are, what is right and wrong, true and false---all directly or indirectly reflect these circumstances, but we are generally unaware of the connection A PREFATORY NOTE

  2. A POWER POINT PRESENTATION FEATURING THE LATEST IN TECHNOLOGICAL WIZARDRY AND PEDAGOGICAL LEDGERDEMAIN Social Welfare Policy (Adults) I MUST BE IN THE WRONG CELL BLOCK! ARE WE GOING TO HAVE TO LISTEN TO THIS STUFF A WHOLE SEMESTER! SSW GRAD STUDENT TERMINATION SCHEDULE A MAGNUM FORCE PRODUCTION WAIT A MINUTE! ISN’T THIS STATS 800? I THOUGHT SOME GUY WAS TEACHING THIS CLASS NEVER THOUGHT I’D LIVE TO SEE THE DAY!

  3. Module I: The Basics of Social Welfare Policy I actually prefer to think of myself as an egghead • What is social welfare policy (swp)? More particularly, what are its origins, dimensions, and types? Why is it important for social workers to know about it? • What is the welfare state (ws)? How does the US ws differ from its European counterpart? • Why has the ws declined in recent years? • Why is politics the key to understanding ws developments? Who supports/opposes the ws & why? See, I told you it was a guy! That’s no guy---that’s a prof!

  4. Social Welfare Policies (1) • Public programs designed to meet basic social needs inadequately met through the market system. • Program eligibility determined by citizenship and/or “means” criteria. • Contents determined via the legislative process, as mediated by values, interests, and “clout” of the contending political actors and their supporters.

  5. Why Study Social Welfare Policy? (1) • Because: • It is the “social” in social work; it does much to shape the social environment in which people live. • Social welfare policy both reflects and helps to define the type of society we live in. (E.g. US vs. Canada) • American politics is largely about what should be the extent and types of swps adopted at various levels of government. • The NASW code requires that social justice, and hence social welfare policy, be a key feature of social work education.

  6. Why Study Social Welfare Policy? (2) • AS ADVOCATES, OPPONENTS, OR IMPLEMENTORS OF SOCIAL WELFARE POLICIES, SOCIAL WORKERS MUST HAVE: • THEORETICAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE GENERAL ROLE SUCH POLICIES PLAY IN SOCIETY. • POLITICALAWARENESS TO GRASP WHY PARTICULAR POLICIES ARE ADVOCATED BY CERTAIN GROUPS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES. • APPLIED KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTENTS AND EVERYDAY IMPACT OF MAJOR NATIONAL SOCIAL WELFARE POLICIES.

  7. Social Welfare Policies in Contextual Perspective WELFARE STATE (PROGRAMS/INSTITUTIONS) ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLEMENTATION SOCIAL WELFARE POLICIES (LAWS)) LEGISLATIVE PROCESS POLITICS (BARGAINING)

  8. Social Welfare Policies: Origins • Political: originate from “felt” needs of some groups and can only be satisfied through government action • Crisis: particular policies are often designed to meet a particular “crisis,” as perceived by those actors who sponsor them. (e.g., Medicare and Social Security reform.) • Evolutionary or revolutionary: policies may evolve from established ones (e.g., changes in SS benefits) or be essentially without national precedent (e.g., Medicare)

  9. SOCIAL POLICY ANALYSIS: DIMENSIONS • Theory • Seeks to understand the functions of swp within the overall context of its “host” society, and conducts research and analyses from this perspective. Key question: Are social welfare policies mere palliatives or are they proof of genuine social progress? • Politics • Seeks to understand the political motives and forces supporting or opposing swps. How and why are particular policies enacted? Who benefits and who loses? Key question: Which direction---liberal, conservative, or ?----are future policies likely to take? • Applied • Seeks to understand policy specifics for practical administrative reasons and to assess the ground level impact such specifics have on the population being served. Key question: What are the practical difficulties and challenges of administering specific policies?

  10. Social Welfare Policies: Types • Universal social insurance programs (social security/medicare/ui) mostly financed through payroll premiums and designed to protect against common existential hazards like unemployment or universal life hazards like old age. The electoral “third rails”of American politics • General revenue programs providing assistance (TANF/Medicaid) to those among the poor who can meet stringent eligibility (“means tested”) criteria. Relatively vulnerable to cuts given popular hostility/indifference towards the poor • Certain tax relief programs that provide benefits to the working poor (EITC) or others (e.g., College tuition credits and proposed deductions for long term home care) • Swps are intended to provide short term aid in case of common hazards and long term support in cases of universal hazards

  11. The Welfare State • The totality of all social welfare programs in any given national setting. • Varies greatly in size, type, and importance depending on the country. • Most elaborate in the most advanced (that is, richest) countries---W. Europe, North America, and a few other places (e.g., Australia/New Zealand). • European welfare states tend to be of the “mature” or “cradle to grave” type. The US welfare state in contrast usually classified as “immature.” • Level of ws development depends on the “balance of contending groups.”

  12. Mature and Immature Welfare States (1) • US • “Social safety nets,” offering relatively modest social insurance programs + publicly funded means-testedprotection against absolute hardship or destitution. These are liberal policies of the type characteristic of US social welfare legislation • EUROPE • Extensive social insurance + publicly funded non-means tested programs designed to reduce the relative inequalities among members of different social classes. These are social democratic policies characteristic of European social welfare legislation

  13. Social security Unemployment insurance Medicare/medicaid Public housing Education through h.S Limited maternity leave Social security Extended ui and retraining Health care for all Housing allowance Free education Family allowance Six months maternity leave Pensions for all Paid vacations Liberal US & SWEDEN (2) Social Democratic

  14. Why Is The US “Exceptional?” (3) • Benefits often provided through work rather than the state; a “privatized” welfare system. (The “Treaty of Detroit” thesis.) • Americans more individualistic than Europeans due to different historical/cultural experience: the “liberal” tradition and the frontier experience. • US pro-welfare state groups less powerful and more fragmented than in W.Europe: divisions within labor and radical movements. • American government more fragmented than in European centralized systems; consequently, easier to block social legislation at various points. (Called the “functionalist thesis.” ) • Capitalist state oppression of the “forces of movement:: ” Palmer raids, “McCarthyism,” and COINTELPRO. Most recently (e.1970s) powerful corporate-backed attack to regain political momentum lost during “the Sixties.”

  15. QUESTION • WHERE DO SOCIAL WORKERS FIT INTO THIS PROCESS?

More Related