1 / 13

Working groups status report on Feedbacks

Working groups status report on Feedbacks. A.Drago, K.Bertsche SuperB Meeting   26-30 January 2000 SLAC. Main Topics. SuperB parameters Subsystem main list R & D Conclusion. Machine parameters.

kian
Télécharger la présentation

Working groups status report on Feedbacks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working groups status report on Feedbacks A.Drago, K.Bertsche SuperB Meeting   26-30 January 2000 SLAC

  2. Main Topics • SuperB parameters • Subsystem main list • R & D • Conclusion

  3. Machine parameters • The SuperB machine parameters must be finalized before we can finalize the feedback systems, in particular: • Harmonic number to design b-b-b feedbacks • Bunch / beam current to dimension power and number of feedback systems: this also affects machine impedance (see Krasnyck’ talk) • Transverse / longitudinal damping time (same goal) • Beam vertical emittance to study the impact of feedback system

  4. Subsystem main list • B-b-b longitudinal feedback • B-b-b transverse feedback • Dither feedback • Fast IP feedback • Low level RF • Longitudinal Bunch Position Control • 1D or 2D bunch-by-bunch diagnostics

  5. R & D • Bunch by bunch longitudinal feedback - the present system is based on very old DSP (digital signal processor) that are completely obsolete - a new version (the so called G-Proto or iGp) is based on a FPGA (V-II) that is ~10 years old, it will become obsolete in 2/3 year -a new design is necessary based on last version FPGA - the digital processing unit design is in progress, the system will work at 12/16 bits to have a better dynamic range respect to the old 8 bit systems - the analog front end/back end needs to be re-designed as well for compatibility with digital and due to the obsolescence of some parts - kicker (cavity) and amplifiers are probably ok, but it should be evaluated for working with bunch pattern by 1 (i.e. ~2ns pulse)

  6. R & D • Bunch by bunch transverse feedback - for best use of resources, the digital processing unit should use the same design as the longitudinal unit - attention should be given to the kicker design to maintain low ring impedance in case of multiple feedback installation - kicker response must be adapt for 2ns pulse (bunch space by 1)

  7. R & D • Dither feedback • Dither in x, y, and (probably) y’, similar to existing system • Upgrades to existing system: • Dither at 1-3 kHz • More efficient coil designs to allow lower currents and smaller drivers • Fast corrections (above ~1 Hz) through dither system • Slow corrections (below ~1 Hz) through standard correctors

  8. R & D • Fast IP feedback - it can be implemented in parallel to the dither feedback (in particular on the vertical plane) - it is independent from the transverse feedback but it uses identical hardware with different firmware/software - it can be used bunch by bunch - sensitivity and signal/noise are open questions  need tests and simulations - it is not clear if the kicker should be identical the transverse kicker or different

  9. R & D • Low level RF • necessary • opinion of the experts (Dan Van Winkle / Claudio Rivetta) is that it will soon be obsolete and must be redone using newer FPGAs • needs a Matlab simulator that should be upgraded for the SuperB parameters (C.Rivetta) • new design should be done by experts: e.g. the J.Fox team at SLAC or outsourced to Dimtel (D.Teytelman)

  10. R & D • Longitudinal Bunch Position Control - same as LLRF - Claudio Rivetta has good know how and a good simulator

  11. R & D • 1D or 2D bunch-by-bunch diagnostics • Diagnostics in 1D or 2D, bunch-by-bunch and turn-by-turn, seems necessary for colliding two beams with so small vertical emittance and sigma • Without valid real time tools, it could be impossible to evaluate the wasting of luminosity along the bunch train

  12. Conclusions • We have considered a list of subsystem with similar technological characteristics or with similar goals • All systems need at least some redesign • Unify the technological choices can help to request less design manpower and to simplify the system management

More Related