1 / 11

ViiM Data Roundup March 14, 2012

This report summarizes the impact of the Vermont Instructional Improvement Model (ViiM) professional development initiative led by Brent Garrett and Bruce Smith. Various evaluation instruments, including the Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) and the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET), provide insights into fidelity and student outcomes over multiple cohorts. Results indicate changes in Office Discipline Referrals (ODRs) across schools and highlight participant perceptions of the program's impact on literacy and behavior. This analysis covers the implementation from Fall 2008 to Fall 2010.

kibo-petersen
Télécharger la présentation

ViiM Data Roundup March 14, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ViiM Data RoundupMarch 14, 2012 Brent Garrett, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation Bruce Smith, Vermont Department of Education

  2. Evaluation Instruments • Behavior • Formative Data – Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) • Fidelity Data – School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) • Student Outcomes – Office Discipline Referrals (ODRs) • Literacy • Fidelity/Formative Data - AIMSweb • Student Outcomes – NECAP Reading Assessment

  3. Participant Perceptions on Impact of ViiM Professional Development • 1 = No Impact, 2 = Little Impact, 3 = Medium Impact, 4 = Large Impact, 5 = Very Large Impact

  4. Disaggregated SAS Scores (Cohort 1) School 1 = Green Line, School 2 = Green Line, School 3 = Red Line,

  5. Cohort 1 Schools SET Scores

  6. Decrease in Office Discipline Referrals

  7. Cohort 1 Schools: Baseline = Fall ‘08 Administration (Captures 3 years of implementation) Cohort 2 Schools: Baseline = Fall ‘10 Administration (Captures 1 year of implementation)

More Related