Download
results n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Results PowerPoint Presentation

Results

69 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Results

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Results

  2. 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 1855 authors Response excluded 41 emails bounced excluded 1564 non-responders excluded 22 incomplete responses

  3. Descriptives • Gender: 1:9 No. Age in groups

  4. Yrs in surgical practice No. of responders 54% 19% 15% 9% 4%

  5. Location of authors 35% 25% 27% 4% 2% 7%

  6. Where last paper published: 9% 6% 7% 14% 22% • Other surgical journal: 13% • Other non-surgical journal: 29% • Yes, journal of first choice: 75% • No, previously submitted to higher IF surgery journal: 14% • No, previously submitted to higher IF non-surgical journal: 5% • No, previously submitted lower IF journal: 3%

  7. Main field of surgery %

  8. Do you prefer to submit your research to general or specialty journals?

  9. The journals you prefer to submit to are predominantly read by: • Global, general 65% • Primarily North-American 29% • by North Americans in 61% • by Europeans in 16% • Primarily European/regional/national 6%

  10. SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORFOR SUBMISSION

  11. The single most important factor:

  12. Age difference for IF vs Rep. p=0.033

  13. Journal factors in categories

  14. Conclusions Factors deemed most important The Journal “prestige” based on • Overall reputation • Impact factor Factors held least important Authors’ own “influence” • Knowing editor(s) or • selecting referees