1 / 20

Initial Results from the ESRPP Stakeholder Meeting - Regional Studies Overview

This document outlines the preliminary findings presented at the ESRPP Stakeholder Meeting held on August 12, 2009, in New Orleans, Louisiana. It covers selected ESRPP study projects, including various high-voltage transmission lines and an autotransformer, highlighting the analysis assumptions, monitoring elements, and planned studies. The summary provides insights into the transfer analysis areas, net interchange results, and future steps for stakeholder engagement. The results aim to inform planning and construction timelines for significant projects within the Entergy and SPP zones.

kimball
Télécharger la présentation

Initial Results from the ESRPP Stakeholder Meeting - Regional Studies Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESRPP 2009 Regional StudiesInitial Results ESRPP Stakeholder MeetingAugust 12, 2009Astor Crown PlazaNew Orleans, Louisiana

  2. Selected ESRPP Study Projects • Turk-McNeil 345 kV • Spadra-Russellville 161 kV • Turk-Fulton-El Dorado 345 kV • Messick 500/230 kV Autotransformer • Flint Creek-Chamber Spr-Fort Smith-ANO 345 kV

  3. Regional Study Overview Map 5 2 1 3 3 345 kV 161 kV

  4. General Study Assumptions for Step 1 High-Level Analysis • MUST DC analysis of FCITC • Monitored and Contingent Elements • 115 kV and above elements within: • Entergy Zones adjacent to SPP • SPP Areas adjacent to Entergy • All elements 345 kV and above in SPP and Entergy • N-1 Contingency Scan (no breaker-to-breaker scan)

  5. General Study Assumptions for Step 1 High-Level Analysis, cont. • MDWG MOD Model 2014 Summer Peak • Incorporate Entergy’s Construction Plan Projects • Identical Source/Sink Transfer Analyses will be performed for all study projects • FCITC Changes from the Base Case will be identified • Planning-level cost estimates and construction timelines provided

  6. Source/Sink Areas for Transfer Analysis • SPP Areas • SPP (all) • AEP West • CLECO • OG&E • Empire District • SWPA EMDE SWPA OGE AEPW • Entergy Areas • Entergy (all) • Amite South • WOTAB CLECO Amite South WOTAB 18 Combinations, bi-directionally = 36 Combinations

  7. Entergy Net Interchange • 1471 MW Net Export to all areas • 1033 MW Net Export to SPP • Positive number indicates EXPORTNegative number indicates IMPORT

  8. FCITC Results: Baseline

  9. (#1) Turk – McNeil 345 kV Turk McNeil New 345 kV Line

  10. FCITC Results: Turk-McNeil 345 kV

  11. (#2) Spadra – Russellville 161kV Line Little Spadra New 161 kV Line Russellville East

  12. FCITC Results: Spadra-Russellville 161 kV

  13. (#3) Turk – Fulton – El Dorado 345 kV Turk New 345 kV Line El Dorado 345 kV Fulton

  14. FCITC Results: Turk-Fulton-El Dorado 345 kV

  15. (#3) Messick 500/230kV Autotransformer New 500/230kV Autotransformer at Messick Existing Mt. Olive-Hartburg 500 kV Line

  16. FCITC Results: Messick 500/230 kV Auto

  17. (#5) Flint Creek – Chamber Springs – Fort Smith – ANO 345kV Line Flint Creek Chamber Springs New 345 kV Line ANO Fort Smith

  18. FCITC Results: Flint Creek-Chamber Spr-Ft Smith-ANO 345 kV

  19. Next Steps • Continue Transfer Analysis • Next Meeting: Draft Report, Stakeholder Input • Post Final Report • First Meeting of Next Cycle: • Select Step 2 Studies • Select Step 1 Studies

More Related