1 / 16

Theories of Reinforcement

Theories of Reinforcement. Why is a reinforcer effective? Why do reinforcers increase the probability of a response?. Some Early Definitions. Empirical: Stimuli that increase the probability of a preceding response are reinforcers circular definition, after the fact

ktrader
Télécharger la présentation

Theories of Reinforcement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Theories of Reinforcement • Why is a reinforcer effective? • Why do reinforcers increase the probability of a response?

  2. Some Early Definitions • Empirical: Stimuli that increase the probability of a preceding response are reinforcers • circular definition, after the fact • better, if shown to be trans-situational • Theoretical: Reinforcers are stimuli that produce “a satisfying state of affairs” • vague

  3. Drive Reduction Theory • Organisms attempt to maintain physiological equilibrium (homeostasis) • Deviations from homeostasis produce biological drives • examples: hunger, thirst, pain • Reinforcers are events that reduce biological drives • examples: Kraft dinner for a hungry undergraduate

  4. Drive Reduction Theory Compare with Set Point Amount of food in body Seek or don’t seek food drives

  5. But…………….. • Sensory reinforcers: Inquiring minds want to know • Some reinforcers actually increase drive states • Behavior itself might be reinforcing

  6. Premack Principle • Behaviorsare reinforcing, not stimuli • To predict what will be reinforcing, observe the baseline frequency of different behaviors • Highly probable behaviors will reinforce less probable behaviors

  7. Implications • Reinforcers are individualized (not intrinsic to the reinforcer itself) • Reinforcers are reversible

  8. Some Problems With Premack’s Principle • Quantification • Some activities naturally take more or less time than others • Opportunities to engage in a restricted (but not lower probability) behavior may act as a reinforcer

  9. Newer View • Timberlake’s Response deprivation hypothesis • reinforcers are responses that have been “deprived”

  10. Response deprivation hypothesis The ice cream scale (in pints) .25 .5 .75 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.0 2.25 2.5 Will work to obtain Will work to avoid ice cream Bliss point (1.0 pint/night)

  11. Response Deprivation Hypothesis • Low frequency behaviors can reinforce high frequency behaviors • All behaviors have a preferred frequency or behavioral bliss point • Deprivation below that frequency is aversive, and organisms will work to remedy this

  12. Behavioral Regulation • Measure time spent in behavior when there is no constraint • behavioral bliss point • Schedule imposes a constraint • schedule line • Time spent in behavior under a constraint will minimize distance from bliss point

  13. The labor supply curve 2 rewards per unit Bliss point 1 reward per unit Amount of reward ¼ reward per unit Amount of Work

More Related