180 likes | 320 Vues
Overview of the WISE SoE TCM data flow. Data sources and handling Data types reported Geographical coverage Problems encountered How do we improve the data flow?. Sources for WISE SoE TCM data. Datatypes covered . New datatypes.
E N D
Overview of the WISE SoE TCM data flow • Data sources and handling • Data types reported • Geographical coverage • Problems encountered • How do we improve the data flow?
New datatypes • Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) based on benthic fauna (test data flow in 2009) • Biological community data? (zoobenthos, phytobenthos, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and fish community)
Important messages to data submitters: • Use the data “funnel” that you find most convenient to use • If submitting oceanographic data to ICES provide those in a format that is easy to output from the national/regional database – don’t force the data into a specific template • Do not submit the same data into different data funnels – risk of duplication
Data contributors Nutrient data
Data contributors Chlorophyll a data
Data contributors Hazardous substances in biota
Common errors and inconsistencies in data submissions – ranked according to severity • Concentration out of range – usually unit error • Dry Wet Ratio not given as a percentage but as a true ratio (e.g. < 1) • Basis not filled in – necessary for the recalculation in relation to different basis used • Sampling depth missing – crucial information in relation to oceanographic data • Latitude and longitude out of range – usually caused by swopping • Concentrations null (missing) – error or not measured? • Determinand names not according to code lists
Suggestion on how to improve submission of data • Use the data for assessments and indicators – “encourage” by displaying empty spots on the European map • Data digging – there is a loot of data out there to be picked up but it requires resources • Improved national/regional coordination and information