1 / 17

Economic crises and the role of science

AAAS 2012 Vancouver | February 17th. Economic crises and the role of science. Introduction. Disasters and crises have a familiar answer : more investments in knowledge Flood Disaster 1953 Netherlands Sputnik Shock 1957 US Ozone hole 1985 Global

kyoko
Télécharger la présentation

Economic crises and the role of science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AAAS 2012 Vancouver | February 17th Economiccrises and the role of science Barend van der Meulen | 1 | JST sessionRedesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  2. Introduction Disasters and crises have a familiaranswer: more investments in knowledge • FloodDisaster1953 Netherlands • Sputnik Shock 1957 US • Ozone hole 1985 Global • Global warming 1988-... Global • 9/11 2001 US - Global • Earthquake 2011 Japan • Economic crisis 2008 // Euro crisis 2011 Barend van der Meulen | 2 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  3. Flooddisaster 1953 Netherlands Barend van der Meulen | 3 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  4. Sputnik Shock 1957 Barend van der Meulen | 4 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  5. Global warming 1988-… Barend van der Meulen | 5 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  6. Economic crisis 2008 // 2011 Twoobservations • The crisis comesnotfromoutside, andscience is part of the problem. • Calls forinvestments in basic sciencecomewith claims thatrevenueswill take 20-years Barend van der Meulen | 6 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  7. Scienceand the crisis I: economics • Trigger: the destruction of the housing market. • Is there no scienceinvolved? There is! Sociology of knowledgeappliedtomarketsandfinance show how financial practices are entangledwithknowledge, technologyand information. (eg MacKenzie, Knorr-Cetina, Callon) • Theoretical misfits: • Distribution of risks • Possibilities of marketsto correct greed • Role of big firms as stabilizinginstitutions Barend van der Meulen | 7 | JST sessionRedesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  8. Role of science in crisis II: NBIC • Kondratieff waves • New scienceandtechnology • New economic sectors andgrowth • New internationalbalances Barend van der Meulen | 8 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  9. International scientificportfolios Formersoviet: Chemistry, Mechanics New Asian NBIC US - Europe Physics, Health Barend van der Meulen | 9 | JST sessionRedesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  10. The Netherlands, Massachussetts, South-Korea Economic crisis is part of a globaleconomicandscientifid shift Barend van der Meulen | 10 | JST sessionRedesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  11. First conclusions / lessons • Disasters have usual response: more science • But scienceis notonly a solution but part of the problem • Scienceandpracticesentangled in “scientific-technological-socialparadigms” • Challenge for risk control is toorganizediversity in scienceand society • Challenge for STI governancein Europe to reform STI institutions Barend van der Meulen | 11 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  12. Effects on science: Europe 2008 Different startingpositions • Science intensive countries UK, GE, FR, CH, NL, SU • Many small countriescatching up: CEEC Barend van der Meulen | 12 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  13. EU response: New Horizon 2020 Excellent Science • European Research Council • Future & Emergent Technology • Training and career • Infrastructures € 24 598 million Industrial Leadership • leadership in Key Enabling Technologies • access to risk finance • innovation in SMEs  € 17 938 million Societal Challenges • Health and demographic change • Food security • Secure and clean energy • Smart transport • Climate and resource efficiency • Inclusive societies € 31 748 million Barend van der Meulen | 13 | JST sessionRedesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  14. National responses: mix • Investments in science, policiestorestructure the science system and breed European Top Universitieswithinglobalcompetition (eg Denmark, Germany, France) • No new budgets andpoliciesto link universities closer toindustry (eg UK, Netherlands) • New budgets cuts especially in countriessufferingfrom the Eurocrisis (eg Greece, Portugal, etc.) Barend van der Meulen | 14 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  15. European struggle Securing the science system • European identity • strong in scientific output and impact • weak links witheconomy • Institutional inert Building aninnovation system • European paradox • Emphasisingsocietalchallenges • University industrycollaborations • Institutionalreforms Barend van der Meulen | 15 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  16. Three possibleoutcomes Scenario 1: Horizon 2020 results in a European knowledge area withintegratedprocesses of research, innovationandhighereducation Scenario 2: Horizon 2020 is obstructedbynationalressentimentsandresults in more complexityandfurtherinstitutionalinertia. Scenario 3: Horizon 2020 andnationalpoliciestogethercreate European winners andnational losers Barend van der Meulen | 16 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

  17. Finalconclusions / lessons • But scienceis notonly a solution but part of the problem • Challenge for risk control is toorganizediversity in scienceand society • Challenge: new governance of science, technologyandinnovation • But science as a solution createsstrugglesabout the role of scienceanditsposition • Danger: more scientific research but without restructuringmaycreate more lock-ins Barend van der Meulen | 17 | JST session Redesigning the Governance of STI after the Earthquake

More Related