220 likes | 337 Vues
This paper presents simulations using GENESIS to study wakefield effects on X-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFEL). We investigate various parameters, such as the gain and efficiency of the system, and analyze how different wakefields affect output power. Key findings reveal that wakefields can significantly reduce power levels by factors of 2.5 to 7, depending on the bunch shape. Implementing a linear taper helps mitigate these effects and boosts power output. The results enhance our understanding of XFEL performance and optimization strategies.
E N D
GENESIS simulations with Wakefields for XFEL Igor Zagorodnov BDGM, DESY 26.09.05
Parameters XFEL theory Gain parameter Efficiency parameter Diffraction parameter Effective power of the input signal
Gain length* Optimal beta-function Saturation length * E.L.Saldin et al./Optics Communications 235 (2004) 415-420
ELOSS= = - 48keV/m head tail tail head
Genesis steady state simulation Scan with ELOSS = - 48keV/m
Power no wake (amplifier) no wake (SASE) with wake (amplifier) with wake (SASE)
Genesis time dependent simulation SASE model Amplifier model
Taper optimization (steady state) Scan with ELOSS = - 100keV/m
Genesis time dependent simulation SASE model
Power (Gaussian bunch) wake+taper with wake no wake
Shape 0 „Real“ shapes from Martin Dohlus http://www.desy.de/~dohlus/2005.09.xfel_wakes head tail Shape 3 tail head tail head
Geometric wake? Longitudinal wake for the case of the elliptical pipe (3.8mm) The wake repeats the bunch shape
Genesis time dependent simulation (SASE) Shape 3 Gaussian
Genesis time dependent simulation (SASE) Shape 0 Gaussian
Power in a.u. Gaussian Shape 0 Shape 3
Gaussian Shape 0 Shape 3 Taper:
Power Gaussian Shape 0 Shape 3
Conclusions 1. The wake field reduces the power at L=250 m by factor 2.5 for the Gaussian bunch and up to factor 7 by the “real” shape 2. The linear taper allows to avoid the degradation and to increase the power by factor 2 for the Gaussian bunch 3. The same taper allows to avoid the degradation for other shapes too Acknowledgements to Evgeny Schneidmiller and Martin Dohlus for the help