Funding Strategies for Community Development: Insights and Case Studies
This document explores innovative funding strategies for community development, highlighting successful case studies including Buller, Acorn Foundation, and Hutt City. It emphasizes the importance of integrated and planned funding approaches, matching projects with the right resources. Key elements discussed include the role of councils in developing community visions, fair share giving principles, and the significance of positive relationships in the funding process. The strategies presented aim to enhance community engagement and provide sustainable funding solutions for future projects.
Funding Strategies for Community Development: Insights and Case Studies
E N D
Presentation Transcript
-- September 2011
TODAY’S CONTENT • Integrated funding for communities (Buller case study) • More Funding Theory and Endowment Funding (Acorn Foundation case study) • Future Leisure Planning and Directions by Councils and communities (Hutt case study) • Some further thoughts and possible implications for libraries
SHOULD A CITY HAVE A FUNDING PLAN? • Since first LTCCPs in 2003, long-term planning with the community getting better …open-ended consultation to strategic consultation • If not Councils, who will take a lead in developing a City’s Vision? • Councils have roading plans, sewerage plans, should they have a community funding plan?
SOME FUNDING THEORY Key Success Elements of Vision and Relationship Based Funding • Clarity of vision and direction for the city • An integrated and planned approach to the funding of community projects • A marketing approach to funding – matching funders with projects, not trying to “make” a project fit with a funder.
BULLER FUNDING Results • $12.192 million from 86 funders, not including Council funding • “$1,200/person” for a 10,000 community over a 5 year gifting period
BULLER FUNDING Results
BULLER FUNDING Results
SOME FUNDING THEORY Key Fundraising Principles • Fair share giving – all donors, both public and private, are asked to make their “fair share” contribution to the project • “Inside-out, top down giving” Council – Development West Coast – Solid Energy – Buller Electricity – Holcim - NBS • Face-to-face asking. People do not give to causes. People give to people with causes • Give yourself before asking to give
SOME FUNDING THEORY For Funding to be Successful • Positive relationships built on trust and confidence are essential • The right donor needs to be matched with the right project for the right purpose at the right time
THE FUNDING PROCESS Project and Institutional Readiness • For each project, assess Project and Institutional Readiness: - What pre-planning still needs to occur to get the project right? - Is the organisation ready for each project? - What still needs to occur, before a Capital Funding Campaign can be implemented?
THE FUNDING PROCESS Consider Fundraising Vehicles • Annual Fund • Capital Campaign • Planned Giving
THE FUNDING PROCESS Consider Funding Sources • Individuals Bequest giving 33% globally • Organisations (e.g. user groups, education, service clubs) • Corporates Partners & Supporters Programme • Commercial Optimise own commercial income • Community/Charitable Trusts Social Lending emerging • Gaming Trusts • Iwi • Local Government Rates, assets sales, loan finance • Central Government Lottery, SPARC/Creative NZ, DOC, MSD, etc
THE FUNDING PROCESS Consider Types of Contribution • Donation • Personal Gift • Special Event • Sponsorship • Investment • Asset Sale • Loan/Debenture • Bequest • Endowment Fund • Contract
THE TAURANGA STORY… The Acorn Foundation • Independent Charitable Trust • Providing long-term stable stewardship through robust Trustee appointment processes and the highest calibre investment managers • Focus to create Endowment Funds – the income from these Funds to be distributed on an annual basis so the capital remains intact and the giving continues forever
THE TAURANGA STORY… The Acorn Foundation • So far 130 donors, with a realisable Endowment Fund value today in excess of $70 million • Currently $5.5 million invested (in near future, expected to increase to over $10+ million) • Success elements: • Professional Advisor Strategy • Donor Approach Strategy • Marketing Strategy
FEATURES OF THE ACORN FOUNDATION • Capital remains intact • Annual income distributed forever • Can direct where annual distributions go • Based in Tauranga/WBOP www.acornfoundation.org.nz
NUMBER OF ENDOWMENT FUNDS www.acornfoundation.org.nz
FUNDS UNDER MANAGEMENT www.acornfoundation.org.nz
EDNA BROWN FUND • Original value of fund: 2003 $ 72 k • Total distributions from her fund $ 31 k (6 community groups) • Current value of the fund $ 74 k www.acornfoundation.org.nz
CLIVE & PATRICIA TOOP FUND • Original value of fund: 2005 $ 1.3 m • Total distributions from his fund $ 247k (30 community groups) • Current value of the fund $ 1.4 mm www.acornfoundation.org.nz
HUTT CITY FUTURE LEISURE DIRECTION Developing… • A compelling leisure vision for the City And some significant leisure rethinking occurring on… • Future facility development and rationalisation • Future facility governance and management • Hutt City policy on overall leisure expenditure • Future funding strategies
KEY LEISURE TRENDS AND DIRECTIONS • An increased demand by the consumer for choice, quality and service • Cross-activity benefits - activity creates activity • Socialisation very important • A level of ‘critical mass’ is needed for sustainable sports solutions • An emphasis on multi-functional facilities with shared resources • Less principal leisure venues of better quality • A need for management with commercial marketing skills
COMMUNITY CATCHMENTS FOR LEISURE PLANNING • Fraser Park and Walter Nash (plus Naenae) – North • Petone – South • Hutt Recreation and surrounding schools – Central • Wainuiomata Stokes Valley and Eastbourne considered separately
A FUTURE LEISURE FACILITY HUB Note, a Leisure Hub may span 2-3 principal leisure venues, Council and secondary school, in each community catchment Key Features • Future flood-lit artificial turf for Rugby, Rugby League, Soccer and Touch • Grass fields for summer and winter sports, e.g., Cricket, Junior Athletics • Specific designated playing spaces at each of our major venues, e.g., Softball at Fraser Park, outdoor and indoor court areas at Walter Nash
A FUTURE LEISURE FACILITY HUB Key Features Important to have a paid people presence, that can take a leadership role with customer service, supervision and management Without adding to operating costs, plus to create multi-activity benefit, at each Leisure Hub provide a fitness centre, and co-locate library where possible/appropriate Fitness and health emphasis, including traditional fitness centre (cardio and weights), health and fitness checks, group exercise classes, community health promotion, start and end point for walking groups etc, a very important element Also Leisure Hub acts as a community meeting point and ‘information centre’
A FUTURE LEISURE FACILITY HUB Key Features • “Movement Education” – some Junior Athletics, Junior Gymnastics, Dance, Martial Arts, again ideally at the principal venue Movement education is very important All our children (3-10 yrs) need to learn how to run, move, swim correctly • Playground, catering for different age-group segments (pre-school, 5-8 yrs, 9-12 yrs, 12+ yrs e.g., for latter, outdoor half court)
LEISURE FACILITY HUB Key Features • Multi-purpose clubrooms, with some café/food/bar service at designated times/peak periods • (Safe) cycleways and walkways to Leisure Facility Hubs
LIBRARIES – SOME THOUGHTS • Councils should continue to fund their responsibilities – should not be asking for funding for library functions which are their responsibility(new not replacement, additional, needed) • Libraries important part of Leisure Hubs (whether with sporting and/or cultural facilities) • Consequently libraries as part of leisure hubs will be affected by capital funding strategies • Compelling vision and need
LIBRARIES – SOME THOUGHTS • Consider all funding sources: (new not replacement, additional, needed) • Endowments • Annual, to Major, to Bequest (‘staircase of giving’) • Organisations (JVs Councils and schools, tertiaries?, Service Clubs) • Corporates (watch sponsorships – cause marketing positioning)
LIBRARIES – SOME THOUGHTS • ‘Commercial’ (– are their smarter ways to provide services - cf internet, to i-site models of jv with retail and i-pods, to retail cluster models – book shop with café with DVD shop – subsidised hire for some DVDs?) • Public grants for needed purpose,relationship-based, as part of City strategy • Ringfence Council leisure spend – provide incentive for optimising funding solutions so can provide improved services – can be assisted by legal structures (e.g. Hutt City Leisure Facilities Trust)