1 / 14

Project Safety

Project Safety. Discussion Items ISMS Assessment Safety Assessment Document Operational Readiness Review. ISMS Assessment. Initial Visit August 30 & 31 ISMS Gap Analysis SLAC Management Presentations Assessment September 26 ?/October 2 ? System Manager Briefings Interviews

lbeall
Télécharger la présentation

Project Safety

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Safety Discussion Items ISMS Assessment Safety Assessment Document Operational Readiness Review

  2. ISMS Assessment • Initial Visit August 30 & 31 • ISMS Gap Analysis • SLAC Management Presentations • Assessment September 26 ?/October 2 ? • System Manager Briefings • Interviews • LCLS ISMS Plan

  3. Safety Training

  4. Readiness Review for Operations • Lehman Review – Late 90’s • 12 Months to CD4 • No Readiness Review Plan/ no Schedule • Mad Scramble to find reviewers • Chaos • It was a stressful time for them!

  5. What If ? Develop a Transparent Review Process Engage Stakeholders Early Plan in Advance Have Clearly Defined Criteria Like Turbo-Tax Criteria is clear Implementation is straight forward Done one time

  6. Readiness Review Goal • Done on or before February 2009 Having Established that: • Hardware is safe to operate as designed • Procedures are in place to run machine • People able, trained & capable to run the machine

  7. Planning Goal Establish process and schedule for conducting reviews that will have us prepared for a successful operational readiness review February 2009 that builds on processes already underway and those that demonstrated to be successful. And Results in a process that will spawn the LCLS Safety Assessment Document

  8. Strawman Plan • Senior SLAC & DOE management aware of initiative & external consultants have been contacted • Introduce concept to LCLS Team - July • Working sessions to build on design criteria sheets and add safety to the current schedule of reviews - August • Briefing & Feedback: local safety officers, system managers, sub element managers - September • Collate schedule and identify reviewers (level resources) • Brief SLAC Management, Site Safety Officers & Citizen Committees • Refine plan as needed; get DOE approval - October • Publish plan - November 2005

  9. STAKEHOLDERS LCLS Readiness Review Planning Special Advisors System Managers Local Safety Officers: Engagement Plan: Who to involve & why Senior Managers Sub-element Managers SLAC Safety Officers DOE Citizen Committees Coordinator: Richard Hislop 7/19/05

  10. LCLS Readiness Review Planning STAKEHOLDERS • • Dave Schultz, Electron Beam Systems • • Steve Milton, magnets, Argonne • • Richard Bianta, vacuum, Livermore • Paul Emma, Accelerator team Leader • John Arthur, Proton Beam Systems • David Saenz, Conventional Facilities b • buy-in, support, influence others • Michael Scharfenstein, SLAC • • Richard Beale, Livermore • • Jim Lang, Argonne • Ian Evans, SLAC • expert opinions; influence others Special Advisors System Managers Local Safety Officers: Engagement Plan: Who to involve & why • Jonathan Dorfan • Keith Hodgson • • John Galayda • Mark Reichanadter • approval • Hardware • Magnets (e.g., power supply, electrical, lamination, support) • Vacuum buy-in; define process details Senior Managers Sub-element Managers SLAC Safety Officers DOE • • Richard Boyce, vacuum • • Sayed Rokni, radiation • • Perry Anthony, electrical • Ted Fieguth, laser • expert opinions; approval • • ALARA • • Earthquake Safety • • Electrical Safety • Environmental Safety • Fire protection • Hoisting And Rigging Safety • Laser Safety • Non-ionizing Radiation Safety • Pressure and Vacuum Vessel Safety • Radiation Safety • reactions, expert opinions, concurrence • • Site Office (e.g., Hanley Lee) • • BES: Roger Klaffky/Jeff Hoy • • Dan Lehman • Pedro Montano • approval Citizen Committees Coordinator: Richard Hislop 7/19/05

  11. ADVICE • Let’s take - One Minute - to collect your thoughts.

  12. If we start now we can structure a process to show that: • We built the machine to specifications, and • We gave safety due consideration. Come on, we know what we are doing. Don’t WORRY ! We can do all this later.

  13. The Objective of the Readiness Review: Assure the machine, when energized, has been built to its design specifications and will perform safely and reliably.

More Related