1 / 34

Motivation; CBM experimental setup, MVD+STS; Open charm at SIS 100; He cooling (no Beam Pipe)

sts. K -.  +.  +. MVD. MAPS. Open charm physics at CBM. I.Vassiliev ,. D 0 , D + , D s + ,  c , D *. Motivation; CBM experimental setup, MVD+STS; Open charm at SIS 100; He cooling (no Beam Pipe) Open charm at SIS 300

lefty
Télécharger la présentation

Motivation; CBM experimental setup, MVD+STS; Open charm at SIS 100; He cooling (no Beam Pipe)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CBM Split sts K- + + MVD MAPS Open charm physics at CBM I.Vassiliev, D0, D+, Ds+ , c , D* • Motivation; • CBM experimental setup, MVD+STS; • Open charm at SIS 100; • He cooling (no Beam Pipe) • Open charm at SIS 300 • D0K-+, D+K-+ +, Ds+ K+K-+; and +c pK-+ • Open charm trigger; • {Ξ0Λ}b detectability study • Summary D+

  2. CBM Split Charm production at threshold energies (motivation) Input to hadronic transport models (HSD): Parameterization of measured cross sections O. Linnyk et al., Nucl. Phys. A786 (2007) 183 No data: (why?) X-sections, flow(s), pt, y; D0/D+, D0/Ds, D0/c ratios

  3. 10 stations (5, 10,30,35,40,50,60,75, 95,100 cm) 2 first in vacuum MAPS: 300 and 500 (m), with 10x10m cell size Strip-detectors (400m), 60 m strip-pitch, 1cm (min.) strip length; Realistic hit producers; -electrons in, no pile-up and clusters for the MAPS detectors CBM Split MVD 100K p+C

  4. CBM Split 44h 11h 05.10.09 4

  5. CBM Split Fast SIMDized CA tracking in STS by I.Kisel p+C 30GeV XZ Top View MC RECO 1.125s eff = 97.9% RefPrim efficiency : 0.999 RefSec efficiency : 0.895 Refset efficiency : 0.991 Allset efficiency : 0.932 Clone probability : 0.023 05.10.09 5

  6. CBM Split Fast SIMDized CA tracking in STS p+C 30GeV XY Rear View K- MC RECO p + p e- e+ - 05.10.09 6

  7. CBM Split Fast SIMDized CA tracking in STS p+C 30GeV 50 pile-up 05.10.09 7

  8. CBM Split Invariant mass resolution 05.10.09 8

  9. CBM Split Z vertex resolution 05.10.09 I.Vassiliev, Dubna, May-09 9

  10. CBM Split primary vertex reconstruction pC background control K- D+ + 2geo + 4.5 tracks central, 1 track mbias 05.10.09 10

  11. CBM Split

  12. CBM Split Open charm z-vertex reconstruction v221 5 cm 10 cm 05.10.09 12

  13. CBM Split Invariant mass spectra HERA-B p+A 920GeV 2weeks @ 1.5MHz particles ID by RICH MD+HSD=2.710-8 BR = 0.095 eff = 13.2 % eff = 11.6 % 3 cut 4 cut with PV BG suppressed 10-30 times! 05.10.09 13

  14. Simulation studies with He, no beam pipe (AuHe minbias) He He CBM Split

  15. Simulation studies with He, no beam pipe (AuHe minbias) Acc(%) Efficiency (%) CBM Split

  16. Simulation studies with He, no beam pipe (AuHe minbias) Acc(%) S/BG ~0.15 and rapidly decreasing with Z A. Kotynia CBM Split

  17. CBM Split RefPrim efficiency : 0.979 (0.93) 0.88 RefSec efficiency : 0.833 Refset efficiency : 0.961 Allset efficiency : 0.905 Clone probability : 0.032 Ghost probability : 0.044 698 reco tracks Au+Au 25AGeV 1.125s eff = 97.9% 0.077s eff = 95.3% 534 mc track 771 mc track 698 tracks 509 tracks

  18. CBM Split sv K- pv + - 5.5 µm primary vertex reconstruction UrQMD background control

  19. CBM Split secondary vertex reconstruction D0 z-vertex resolution vs second MAPS z-position 3-d MAPS realistic sv K- pv + 500 m - 5.5 µm

  20. CBM Split Open charm z-vertex reconstruction realistic MAPS D0K-+

  21. CBM Split Strategy: background suppression keeping maximum of efficiency single track parameters based cuts: • χ2primon the impact parameter value 6.5-7.5 ! • IP impact parameter cut (upper value) 1mm • track momentum cut p > 1.0 GeV/c • track transverse momentum pt > (0.2-0.5) GeV/c multiple track (particle) parameters based cuts: • χ2GEOgeometrical constrained fit 3.0 • χ2TOPOtopological constrained fit 2.0 • signal particle primary vertex DCA < 30 m

  22. CBM Split D0 and D0 @ 25AGeV minv spectra 1010 events

  23. CBM Split D+ and D- @ 25AGeV minv spectra

  24. CBM Split Ds+ @ 25AGeV minv spectra K+K-+ (5.3 ± 0.8)% +(4.5 ± 0.4)% -> K+K-(2.2 ± 0.2)% K+K*(892), K*(892) ->K-+(2.5)%

  25. CBM Split Ds+ @ 25AGeV minv spectra

  26. CBM Split Open Charm Trigger-algorithm CbmL1TrackFinder RFmb = 125 RFcen = 14 CbmL1TrackFitter Charm Track Candidates Selection χ2prim > 3 ☻ Charm Pairsχ22geo< 3.0, zv <1 cm χ2topo < 3.0, minv > 1.3 GeV ☺D0 ☻ ☺ D+c Ds Charm Tripletsχ23geo+topo < 3.0

  27. CBM Split Detached Vertex Trigger: first results

  28. CBM Split Open charm properties table (25AGeV)

  29. {Ξ0Λ}b -dibaryon detectability study in the CBM experiment {Ξ0Λ}b→ΛΛ→ pπ-pπ- STS π- p p p MAPS π- Λ p π- Λ Λ {Ξ0Λ}b π- Λ {Ξ0Λ}b

  30. Event topology: p π- p Λprim π- χ2topo Λ2 pv {Ξ0Λ}b Λ1 χ2topo p π-

  31. {Ξ0Λ}b-dibaryon signal and ΛΛ-background z vertex distribution We use all cuts except cut on z vertex Distribution was fitted with exponent Integral under exponent from 3 to  was calculated. To estimate amount of ΛΛ candidates for 1012 events integral was multiplied by 108

  32. Reconstructed invariant mass distribution with theoretically predicted parameters 50K 50K

  33. Reconstructed invariant mass detectability level (multiplicity  few10-6) 50 M = 7·10-6

  34. CBM Split Summary CBM detector is suitable for the Open charm measuring at SIS 100 and SIS 300 energies He inside MVD and STS isn’t good for the Open charm New Primary vertex finder has been developed New KFParticle CBM detector can collect about 50K {Ξ0Λ}b -dibaryons per 1012 central collisions Au+Au 25 AGeV Detectability limit is about few·10-6H-dibaryons per central event Plans: -electrons, pile-up, clustering in the MAPS, new detector geometries and passive materials;

More Related