1 / 14

Jets and Multiphase Turbulence

Jets and Multiphase Turbulence. Martin Krause MPI für extraterrestrische Physik Universitätssternwarte München Crete - 20th May 2008. Overview. Comparison: NLR & ENLR 3D Multiphase turbulence simulations. Emission Line Regions in Extragalactic Jet Flows. High redshift radio galaxies:.

lesterswanson
Télécharger la présentation

Jets and Multiphase Turbulence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jets and Multiphase Turbulence • Martin Krause • MPI für extraterrestrische Physik • Universitätssternwarte München • Crete - 20th May 2008

  2. Overview • Comparison: NLR & ENLR • 3D Multiphase turbulence simulations

  3. Emission Line Regions in Extragalactic Jet Flows High redshift radio galaxies: Redshift 1 radio galaxies blue + radio con’s red + radio con’s Linear scale, 50 kpc Scaling to Seyferts by MBH?: critical scale -> ≈ 1kpc

  4. NLR of Seyfert Galaxy NGC 1068 Capetti et al. 1997, Hα+[NII] 1” = 72 pc Wilson & Ulvestad 1983, 4.9GHz + 15GHz insets • Radio & emission line features corellated • Bright NLR part: jet bent / cloud hit • Filamentary NLR & radio structure

  5. NLR of Seyfert Galaxy M51 1” = 41 pc Bradley, Kaiser & Baan 2004 Hα+[NII], 8.4 GHz contours [OIII] • Radio & emission line features corellated • Filamentary NLR & radio structure • NLR may be a turbulent mixing region

  6. Parameters deduced from Observations

  7. Multiphase turbulence in radio cocoons → Simulations • Setup • Start with Kelvin-Helmholtz instability plus dense clouds • Compressible 3D hydrodynamics + cooling (DS+molecules @ low T), codes: Nirvana, (Flash) • Density ratios: 10-4, Mach: 0.8 (80 in warm medium) • Here: vary warm gas Temperature and cloud density, ctrl: no clouds, & resolution

  8. Multiphase turbulence in radio cocoons → 3D Results Emissivity Vertical Integral Horizontal Integral

  9. Multiphase turbulence in radio cocoons → 3D Results Slices of log. density • Cool gas tends to form small cloudlets • clouds shielded by intermediate material • 2D: filaments

  10. Data Analysis: Temperature Distribution 14,000 K • Realisation of shock ionisation scenario: equilibrium temperature: 14,000 K independent of simulation details • Mixing different in 2D and 3D (also resolution • Signal above mixing level evident in both cases • Evidence for cooler gas (1000 K, molecular?) 2D 3D 14,000 K

  11. Data Analysis: EL-density - Ekin Etot correlates with cloud density => increased pressure compresses clouds ENLR: n & Etot too small NLR: n too small /kpc3

  12. Data Analysis: EL-pow - vel. ENLR M51 • dominated by time evolution • no obvious correlation • but some dependence on amb. temperature, more dv => tot. Ener. matters

  13. Data Analysis: EL-pow - Ekin EL-pow cor./w. Ekin & Tbg Best one with kinetic energy => We simulate a realisation of the shock ionisation scenario startup mess /kpc3

  14. Summary • NLR scaled down parameters from ENLR • Simulated turbulent multiphase jet - environment interaction • Realisation of shock ionisation scenario • MPT outputs 1 erg/s ELP per 1012 erg kin energy • Agreement in M51: new support for shock ionisation scenario • 14,000 K equilibrium T, also 105 K gas • Electron density too low, perhaps ok for ENLR, not for NLR somethings missing, maybe more mass or radiative transfer ?

More Related