Download
comparision of qualitative and quantitative approach to research n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Comparision of Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to Research PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Comparision of Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to Research

Comparision of Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to Research

842 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Comparision of Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to Research

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparision of Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to Research

  2. Description • The goal is to understand the viewpoint of a research participant. • The researcher is going to impose his or her cultural, social, and personal identity on any interpretation of the research participants’ experience.

  3. Focus: Voice of the Marginalized • The focus of qualitative research is to give voice to people at the margins of a culture. • Qualitative researchers would content, that there are a lot of people who are not accurately represented by the typical case, average or trend. • The focus of qualitative research is to describe the meaning of participants ’ experiences even if the participant or experience is not typical in the majority experience.

  4. Methods: Inductive • An inductive approach is a process of reasoning that follows a path — observation precedes theory, hypothesis and interpretation. • Qualitative researchers let the data “ speak ” to them and try to avoid going into a study with a preconceived idea of what they will find.

  5. Criteria for Truth: Phenomenological Validity • The sign of a good qualitative research study is that the analysis provides a new and compelling interpretation of a text. • Students who have read this particular study report an “ Aha! ” phenomenon: “ That happened to me! ”“ That sounds just like my roommate! ”“ I know what he / she ’ s talking about! ” • “ Aha! ” criterion is phenomenological validity.

  6. How to Prepare Questions to Interview??? • Practical Suggestions

  7. suggested forms of gathering information • Literature Analysis • Youths’ Opinions About Risk Behaviour • Observations and Interviews with Professionals • Observations and Interviews with Youth Who Are Involved in Risk Behaviour

  8. Closed - vs. Open - Ended Questions

  9. Multiple - vs. Single - Issue Questions

  10. Avoid “Why?” Questions

  11. Ethical Issues in Research

  12. Threat: • charged with participation in the offense, immoral behaviour; • Prevention: • Analysis of the Penal Code, to avoid situations leading to the evaluation of behavior as criminal, immoral • Suggested methods: • consultations with lawyers

  13. Threat: • Perception of the researcher as a potential customer • Prevention: • researcher playing a social role(s) appropriate to the needs of research • Suggested methods: • researcher as therapist, teacher, friend, colleague, volunteer

  14. Threat • Recognize individuals and groups associated with RB and cooperate groups • Prevention • Nonviolence and mutual loyalty • Suggested methods • Recommendations from members of the groups, gangs, etc.

  15. Threat • Research conditions (difficult, risky and full of tantalizing suggestions) • Prevention • Consistent retention of rules and boundaries • Suggested methods • mode of expression by clothes, argot; consequence in role-taking

  16. Threat : • the acceptance of abnormality by researcher • Prevention: • search of competent judges evaluating the taken actions • Suggested methods • tools and categories of observation, analysis of the achieved results