1 / 20

Valuation of Ecosystem Services

Valuation of Ecosystem Services An Integrated Hydrological and Economic Model to Value the Enhanced Nitrogen Retention in Renaturated Streams. Ingo Bräuer & Rainer Marggraf. Institute of Agricultural Economics University of Göttingen. Contents. Introduction

london
Télécharger la présentation

Valuation of Ecosystem Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Valuation of Ecosystem Services An Integrated Hydrological and Economic Model to Value the Enhanced Nitrogen Retention in Renaturated Streams Ingo Bräuer & Rainer Marggraf Institute of Agricultural Economics University of Göttingen

  2. Contents • Introduction • The Replacement Cost Method (RCM) • General Idea and Problems at Application • Chemical Processes in the River • Modelling Changes in the Nitrogen Retention • Valuation of the Nitrogen-Retention • Practical Problems using the RCM

  3. Aims Development of a user-friendly procedure to evaluate the ecosystem function N-retention to promote the use of RCM Discussion of the choice of technical substitutes

  4. Case study: the enhanced N-retention in renaturated streams to evaluate a conservation program The Replacement Cost Method Valuation by comparison of an ecological function and a corresponding technical substitute

  5. Quantity 1. Quantification of the ecosystem function X 2. Determination of the technical substitute and its marginal costs Price = Value 3. Economic benefits of the ecosystem service Replacement Cost Method Valuation Procedure

  6. Replacement Cost Method Valuation Procedure Quantity 1. Quantification of the ecosystem function X 2. Determination of the technical substitute and its marginal costs Price = Value 3. Economic benefits of the ecosystem service

  7. Study Area

  8. Distelbach Pegel „Kreuzgrund" Jossa-Insel Sahlensee Oberndorf Pfaffenhausen Investigated River

  9. GIS Lower runnig velocity Denitrification:N-Compounds N2 Increase in flooded Area Increase in flooded Area Model: Behrendt & Opitz (2000) Rates of Denitrification (Literature) Non-point N-Imission pointN-Imission Problem River System Influence of Beavers on the Structure of the River River Floodplain Floodplain Denitrification-Processes 1 Models

  10. + 710 kg/a + 460 kg/a + 1.170 kgN/a Diffuse N-Imission punktuelleN-Imission Problem River System Jossa Influence of Beavers on the Structure of the River River Floodplain Floodplain Hydraulic Load +15% Denitrification-Processes +15.500 m² Increase in flooded area 1 Models

  11. Valuation Procedure 1. Quantification Quantity Spessart: 4.700 kgN/a X Price = Value

  12. Valuation Procedure (RCM) Quantity 1. Quantification of the ecosystem function X 2. Determination of the technical substitute and its marginal costs Price = Value 3. Determination of the economic benefits

  13. Drinking Water Sewage Plant Agricul. Politics +non-point and point emissions - Standard too high +similar process and output - non-point emissions - no cost-efficient alternative +most efficient method - atmospheric emissions Overestimation Not identical Underestimation 55 € 7,5 € 2,5 € Replacement Costs Price

  14. Valuation Procedure (RCM) 2. Replacement Costs Quantity Avoidance of N-Emissions X Price 2,5 €/kgN = Value

  15. ca. 4.700 kgN/a 2,5 €/kgN ca. 12.000 €/a Valuation Procedure (RCM) 3.Economic Value Quantity X Price = Value 12%

  16. 290 % 40 % 12 % Factor >20 Reference-Scenario 1. Drinking Water 2. Sewage Plant 3. Agricul. Pol. 55 € 7,5 € 2,5 € 260.000 €/a 36.000 €/a 12.000 €/a

  17. Summary • An estimation of economic values is possible • The results depend highly on the reference scenario • A transparent procedure is essential to assess the quality of the results

  18. etc. Non-Evaluated Compounds ? Flood Prevention Recharge Ground Water Self-purificationof o.E. Nitrogene-Retention Evaluated Compound Replacement Cost Method Total Econ. Value

  19. The investigated Program: • When: 1987 Reintroduction of 18 Beavers • Where: Spessart (n-w) Jossa und Sinn • What: Program included Purchase of Land and Habitat-Develpoment • 2001: Population of ca. 180 Ind. in severeal River systems (u.a. Kinzig)

  20. CVM CVM CVM CVM CVM Hedonic Pricing Replacement Cost Method Travel-Cost- Method Total Economic Value (TEV) TEV Use Values Non-Use Values Direct UV Indirect UV Option Value Bequest V. Existence V. Habitat Habitat Ecosystem Recreation genetic Resources Functions Species Species Species Obs.

More Related