1 / 31

Consumption

Consumption. Mankiw Chapter 16. Learning Objectives. The limitations of the Keynesian consumption function The role of interest rates in consumption The influence of age on consumption The permanent income hypothesis. The Keynesian Consumption Function.

louie
Télécharger la présentation

Consumption

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Consumption Mankiw Chapter 16

  2. Learning Objectives • The limitations of the Keynesian consumption function • The role of interest rates in consumption • The influence of age on consumption • The permanent income hypothesis

  3. The Keynesian Consumption Function • Looking at Aggregate Demand (closed economy) • Y = C + I + G • Assuming G is exogenous, this leads to enquiring into determinants of Consumption and Investment • Consumption is of particular interest (multipliers, etc) • Previously we have: • C = (1 - s)Y (0  s < 1) • C = C(Y - T) • We need to model the behaviour of C

  4. Keynes (1936) • Keynes (1936) made three main assertions: • C = C(Y), (not r) • 0  MPC  1, (where MPC is dC/dY) • APC falls as Y increases (APC is C/Y) • Taken together these imply a Consumption Function of the form: C = A + bY • where A and b are positive constants • APC = A/Y + b • MPC = b • and A/Y must fall as Y increases

  5. Keynes C. Fn. As Y increases, C/Y falls: also dC/dY  C/Y C 45O C = A + bY dC/dY = b A 0 Y

  6. Empirical Evidence • Keynes hadn’t have much statistical evidence on consumption • Early estimates in the 1940s for the USA and elsewhere were conflicting. • Short-medium term annual data (1929-45) • C = A + bY; A 0; b  0.7 • Long-term data (1869-1945) • C = bY: A  0, b  0.9 • Which is “right”? • We need a proper model to answer this.

  7. Contrasting Empirical Evidence • 1929-45: C = A + bY • 1869-45; C = b*Y C 45O b* 0.9 C = b* Y C = A + bY b 0.7 0 Y

  8. Alternative Models • Clearly the simple Keynes approach is missing something. • We look at Three candidates • Interest rates: Intertemporal Choice model (Fisher) • Age: The Life-Cycle theory of (Modigliani, etc) • Forward looking consumers: The Permanent Income theory of Consumption (Friedman)

  9. Intertemporal Choice • Individuals can borrow against future income to fund consumption now or save now to fund consumption in the future • Hence consumption choice is a decision on timing • Consumption will be influenced by interest rates • Specifically • Consumer chooses between consumption in different time periods • The “price” of shifting consumption between periods is the interest rate • Apply standard consumer choice theory from micro

  10. The Micro of Consumer Choice • Budget constraint • Generally we require: PV(C)  or  PV(Y) • Two periods • C1 + C2  (1+r)  or  Y1 + Y2 (1+r) • Many Periods •  Ci  (1+r)i or   Yi  (1+r)i • Households maximize Utility over expected lifetime • U (C1, ..., Ci, ... , Cn) • Notice how this is just a special case of the standard two good model from micro

  11. Consumer Choice Indifference Curves represent U = U(C1 , C2 ) C2 C1 0

  12. Budget Constraint Endowment at E: OB = PV(Y) = y1 + y2  (1 + r) Slope of AB is  (1 + r) Y2 A . E y2 y1 Y1 0 B

  13. The “Price” of Consumption • Why is slope AB = - (1 + r) ? • Suppose (present) savings increase by €100 • i.e. C1 = - 100 • This allows an increase in C2 of 100(1 + r) • i.e. C2 = +100 (1 + r) • Slope AB = C2  C1 = 100 (1 + r)/ - 100 • = - (1 + r)

  14. A Change in r An increase in r: AB pivots at E  CD Y2 C A . E y2 y1 Y1 0 D B

  15. Consumption Choice • Max U st BC • Saving is (oy1- oc*1) : future dis-saving is (oc*2 - oy2) Y2 A c*2 c* . y2 E 0 c*1 y1 B Y1

  16. Change in Income • Y2 increases: E’  E”, AB  CD, c’1  c”1 Y2 C A . E” . E’ 0 c’1 c”1 B D Y1

  17. A Change in r when saver • Income effect 1 3; Sub effect 3  2 Y2 C F A 2 3 1 . y2 E 0 y1 Y1 c31 c21 D B G c11

  18. Change in R when Borrower • Inc. effect 1  2; Sub. effect 2  3 Y2 C A . F E 3 1 2 0 Y1 y1 c31 c11 c21 D G B

  19. Lessons of Intertemporal Model • Consumers are potentially forward looking • The ability to borrow or save means that consumption can be influenced by future income • Interest rates can influence consumption in potentially complicated ways • Wealth can influence consumption • All these factors were absent from the simple model

  20. Life Cycle Model • Income shows a marked life-cycle variation • It is low in the early years, reaches a peak in late middle age and declines, especially on retirement • Smoothing consumption over a lifetime is a rational strategy (diminishing MUy) • This implies C/Y will vary during the lifetime of an individual

  21. Life Cycle Hypothesis • Two period version C2 E’: low Y1/Y2  high C1/Y1 E”: high Y1/Y2  low C1/Y1 A E’ . C2* . E” C1 B 0 Y1’ C1* Y1”

  22. Cons Varies over life-time Y, C and W over the life-cycle Y, C Ct Yt Age 18 65 +W Wt Age W

  23. The Life Cycle • Let retirement age = 65; life expectancy = 75 • Years to retirement = R (= 65 – present age) • Expected life = T (= 75 – present age) • Assuming no pension, no discounting: • CT = W + RY is the lifetime constraint • C = (W + RY)/T • C = (1/T)W + (R/T)Y • C = W + Y ( = 1/T;  = R/T)

  24. Life Cycle Model • C = W + Y • MPC =  C Y =  • APC = C Y =  (W  Y) +  • clearly MPC < APC • for a “typical” individual, age 35 • R=30, T = 40 •  = 1/T  0.03;  (MPC) = RT  0.75 • APC = [0.03 (W  Y) + 0.75] > MPC • This helps explain the Kuznets data

  25. Empirical Relevance • This helps explain the Kuznets data • Recall short term CPC falls with income • But long term APC is constant • Here APC > MPC so APC falls with Y • for fixed W • In long term W will rise with income • So APC will be constant

  26. Savings • Saving and Consumption behaviour may depend on population age-structure • Does Social Security displace personal savings? • What is the effect of Medicare (USA) or Medical Cards for over 70s (IRL) on Savings? • Savings and Uncertainty: • “rational” behaviour: run down wealth to zero • individual circumstances unpredictable (care needs) • individual life expectancy unpredictable • on average even selfish people will die with W > 0

  27. Lessons of LCH • Consumption and income vary over the life cycle • Consumption function should have wealth and age as variables • Elderly save more than is suggested by the LCH

  28. The Perm Income Hypothesis • Income has both permanent and transitory components. • Y = Yp+ Ytr • Consumption is more strongly influenced by permanent component • Cp= kYp (0  k  1 ) • Permanent income is the return to all wealth, human and non-human: • Yp = rW

  29. Transitory Income • What happens to Ytr? • Saved • Added to wealth • Consume return on it • In reality people will consume at least some of transitory income • See case studies in book • PIH does not hold exactly in the real world

  30. Recessions and Booms • Ytr> 0 in boom, < 0 in recession • C should be the same (perm inc same) • Measured C/Y should  be < in boom than in recession • Suppose there is a shock to the system (financial crisis) • Expect severe long-drawn-out recession • Yp falls • C falls • Current situation: big fall in W • PIH suggests C will fall

  31. Conclusions • Keynesians consumption function is proximately true but is too simple • Interest rates and wealth have a effect because people can transfers consumption through time • Age and life cycle effects are specific reasons why the might transfer consumption • Transitory should matter less than permanent income

More Related