160 likes | 298 Vues
This document outlines strategies to improve cooperation and quality in delivering National Accounts (NA) statistics from Primary Statistics (PS). It emphasizes the importance of establishing reliable, user-oriented data, addressing shortcomings, and ensuring clarity through structured communication. Key areas include developing methods for collaboration, defining service level agreements (SLAs), and conducting evaluations of processes to uphold quality standards. The mission focuses on adapting data structures, ensuring agreed quality, and fostering effective interactions between NA and PS teams.
E N D
Improving cooperation and quality in deliveries from Primary statistics (PS) to National Accounts (NA) Roger Pettersson Statistics Sweden
Key words • NA= National Accounts • PS= Primary statistics • RI= Right Input = Team at NA • SLA= Service Level Agreements • Quality Evaluation form
Roger P NR/SES Roger P NR/SES
Aim • Reliable and user-oriented NA-statistics • Quality declarations of PS for NA’s needs • Improvements if shortcomings • Investigations if something is unclear • Adapted structure of the delivered data • Information describing the delivered data This should be regulated in SLA’s between NA and PS
Right Input • Task: Develop and preserve methods and tools for communication and cooperation between NA and PS • Give guiding principles for the work • Supporting those involved • Storing documents • Monitoring the process • Follow up and evaluation meetings • Suggesting products and timetables
Process • A series of activities that work up a product • Repeated several times in a similar way. • A distinctly defined start and end • Always has an internal or external customer
Statistics production process Evaluate and feedback 8 Specify needs 1 Design and plan 2 Build and test 3 Collect 4 Process 5 Analyse 6 Disseminate and communicate 7 Support and infrastructure
Mission statement • Data in an adapted structure to NA • Agreed quality in all quality dimensions • Content and quality shall be sufficient for • users’ application of the NA statistics • Discrepancies between NA and PS figures • regardingcomparability and coherence are • explained upon publication • Well developed cooperation • NA and PS Heads must give priority to the work
Support to the SLAprocess • Guidelines for the SLAwork • Quality Evaluation Form • Checklist for SLAmeetings(quality meetings) • Yearly document of planned deliveries • Form for SLA • Checklist for follow-up meetings • Mailbox *Right Input
Components in the Quality evaluation form 1 • Information that identifies the source and the part(s) of NAcalculation • 16 components about • Population and sampling • Sampling uncertainty • Measurement error and problems • Estimation and processing errors • Summary evaluation of the components above • Documentation
Components in the Quality evaluation form 2 • Revision policy • Knowledge exchange • Preserving Secrecy - publishing level • Timeliness • Quarterly/Yearly data • Previous SLA • Quality change made over time • Cooperation between different • Primary statistics • Report on differences between • Primary statistics and NA
Quality information – deliveries from PS to NA 1 • General information (every year) • Information about population • Changed content of variables, changed definitions, time series break? • Sampling and sample handling
Quality information – deliveries from PS to NA 2 • Information at deliveries • General information (at deliveries) • Break in time series • Changes in samples • Non-response • Random errors • Measurement problems • Estimates • Explanation of big changes • Description of tables
Evaluation of the job • NA and PS have follow-up meetings about content in the SLA and the process • RI and those at NAdepartmentresponsible for the SLA have a yearly follow-up meeting about the process • RI and the heads for NAunitshave follow-up meetings • The result of the job is presented for the internal council for NA