1 / 9

EXPLOITING SYMMETRY IN TIME-DOMAIN EQUALIZERS

EXPLOITING SYMMETRY IN TIME-DOMAIN EQUALIZERS. M. Ding and B. L. Evans The University of Texas at Austin Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Austin, TX 78712-1084 USA {ming,bevans}@ece.utexas.edu. R. K. Martin and C. R. Johnson, Jr. Cornell University School of Electrical and

lyn
Télécharger la présentation

EXPLOITING SYMMETRY IN TIME-DOMAIN EQUALIZERS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EXPLOITING SYMMETRY IN TIME-DOMAIN EQUALIZERS M. Ding and B. L. Evans The University of Texas at Austin Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Austin, TX 78712-1084 USA {ming,bevans}@ece.utexas.edu R. K. Martin and C. R. Johnson, Jr. Cornell University School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ithaca, NY 14853 USA {frodo,johnson}ece.cornell.edu

  2. channel carrier magnitude subchannel frequency Subchannels are 4.3 kHz wide in ADSL Introduction • Discrete Multitone (DMT) Modulation • Multicarrier: Divide Channel into Narrow band subchannels • Band partition is based on fast Fourier transform (FFT) • Standardized for Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Lines (ADSL)

  3. N/2 subchannels N real samples S/P quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) encoder mirror data and N-IFFT add cyclic prefix P/S D/A + transmit filter Bits TRANSMITTER channel RECEIVER N/2 subchannels N real samples P/S time domain equalizer (TEQ) QAM demoddecoder N-FFT and remove mirrored data S/P remove cyclic prefix receive filter + A/D Up to N/2 1 - tap FEQs ADSL Transceiver (ITU Structure)

  4. copy copy s y m b o l ( i+1) CP CP s y m b o li CP: Cyclic Prefix v samples N samples channel Shortened channel Cyclic Prefix Combats ISI with TEQ • CP provides guard time between successive symbols • We use finite impulse response • (FIR) filter called a time domain • equalizer to shorten the channel • impulse response to be no longer than cyclic prefix length

  5. nk yk rk xk h w + MSSNR TEQ Design • Maximum Shortening SNR (MSSNR) TEQ: Choose w to minimize energy outside window of desired length • The design problem is stated as • The solution will be the generalized eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue of matrix pencil (B, A) hwin, hwall : equalized channel within and outside the window

  6. Symmetry in MSSNR designs • Fact: eigenvectors of a doubly-symmetric matrix are symmetric or skew-symmetric. • MSSNR solution: • A and B are almost doubly symmetric • For long TEQ lengths, w becomes almost perfectly symmetric • MSSNR for Unit Norm TEQ (MSSNR-UNT) solution: • A is almost doubly symmetric • In the limit, the eigenvector of A converge to the eigenvector of HTH, which has symmetric or skew-symmetric eigenvectors.

  7. Symmetric MSSNR TEQ design • Idea: force the TEQ to be symmetric, and only compute half of the coefficients. • Implementation: instead of finding an eigenvector of an Lteq  Lteqmatrix, we only need to find an eigenvector of an matrix. • The phase of a perfectly symmetric TEQ is linear, • Achievable bit rates:

  8. Matlab DMTTEQ Toolbox 3.1 • The symmetric design has been implemented in DMTTEQ toolbox. • Toolbox is a test platform • for TEQ design and • performance evaluation. • Most popular algorithms • are included in the toolbox • Graphical User Interface: • easy to customize your • own design. • Available at http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~bevans/projects/adsl/dmtteq/

  9. Conclusions • Infinite length MMSNR TEQs with a unit norm constraint are exactly symmetric, while finite length MSSNR TEQs are approximately symmetric. • A symmetric MSSNR TEQ only has one fourth of FIR implementation complexity. • Symmetric design enables frequency domain equalizer and TEQ to be trained in parallel. • Symmetric design exhibits only a small loss in the bit rate over non-symmetric MSSNR TEQs. • Symmetric design doubles the length of the TEQ that can be designed in fixed point arithmetic.

More Related