1 / 11

Miquel Payaró Xavier Mestre Ana Pérez Miguel A. Lagunas

Miquel Payaró Xavier Mestre Ana Pérez Miguel A. Lagunas CENTRE TECNOLÒGIC de TELECOMUNICACIONS de CATALUNYA CTTC. Weighting. Receiver. Symbol Mapper.

lyoder
Télécharger la présentation

Miquel Payaró Xavier Mestre Ana Pérez Miguel A. Lagunas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Miquel Payaró Xavier Mestre Ana Pérez Miguel A. Lagunas CENTRE TECNOLÒGIC de TELECOMUNICACIONS de CATALUNYA CTTC

  2. Weighting Receiver Symbol Mapper • If perfect CSI is assumed at the receiver end, the achievable rates of a MIMO system depend on the quality and quantity of CSI available at the transmitter side. • Generic effect of partial side information in MIMO Systems [Skoglund]. Capacity can be achieved by a structure that first maps source symbols into space-time codewords independently from CSI and then weights these codewords as a function of CSI

  3. Weighting Receiver Symbol Mapper • Baseline architecture • Which is the optimum transmit filter, W, if only the channel modulus is known at the transmitter. • Motivation: TDD systems (exploitation of electromagnetic reciprocity).

  4. We are interested in maximizing the mutual informationbetween the transmitted and the received signals. For aparticular realization of the flat-fading channel matrix, H, the mutual information is given by • Wewish to find the covariance matrix that maximizes the mutual information averaged overthe statistics of the unknown part of the incomplete CSI

  5. First result: we prove that power allocation is a capacity achieving structure in this situation. • Second result: we give a description of the optimum power allocation strategy in the 2x2 case. • Otherwise: power allocation (roots of a fourth order polynomial) Antenna selection SNR at the receiver

  6. Graphical summary for the 2x2 case

  7. Technical problems: • No great capacity improvement in rayleigh i.i.d. flat fading channels w.r.t. uniform power allocation. • Closed form analysis limited to the flat fading 2x2 case. • For the general case, numerical solutions are computationally hard to obtain. • Possible solutions: • Formulation extension to frequency-selective channels. • Performance improvement w.r.t. uniform power allocation. • Maximin approach  closed form solution for the 2 x n flat fading case. • Numerical solutionsare computationally simpler to obtain.

  8. Formulation for frequency selective channels (based on a multicarrier approach  capacity lossless structure) + Power Constraints!

  9. Maximin formulation • Closed form solution for the 2 x n case

  10. In the maximin formulation, we can make use of the following approximation (exact when min(nR,nT) = 2) • Single carrier problem formulation • Multicarrier problem formulation • In both cases, the solution can be computed very efficiently!

  11. Performance of multicarrier maximin approach, for HIPERLAN/2 type A power delay profile, with 4 transmit and 4 receive antennas with 48 active subcarriers

More Related