1 / 15

Stormwater C.3 Guidebook

Stormwater C.3 Guidebook. 6 th Edition. CCCWP Management Committee February 15, 2012. Topics. Brief Guidebook History Key Changes from 5 th Edition Ongoing Issues Recommended Action. Guidebook History. 6 th Edition. Special Projects Table 4-14 on Page 60

Télécharger la présentation

Stormwater C.3 Guidebook

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stormwater C.3 Guidebook 6th Edition CCCWP Management CommitteeFebruary 15, 2012

  2. Topics • Brief Guidebook History • Key Changes from 5th Edition • Ongoing Issues • Recommended Action

  3. Guidebook History

  4. 6th Edition • Special Projects • Table 4-14 on Page 60 • Narrative Analysis of Feasibility of LID on Special Projects (Instructions are in Guidebook but need to reference these instructions in template) • Technical Criteria for non-LID Facilities (in preparation; to be posted to website)

  5. 6th Edition • Harvesting and Reuse • Feasibility Screening Procedure on Page 40-42 • Background on Page 17 • Underdrain discharge located at top of gravel layer unless infiltration must be prevented

  6. 6th Edition • Soils, Plants, and Irrigation • Updated Appendix B • Incorporates MRP “Attachment L”

  7. Template • Follows organization and content of guidance in Chapter 3 • Annotated with explanations and prompts • Prompts Harvesting and Use Feasibility Calculations • Prompt for feasibility narrative to be added • Supports presentation of sizing calculations in Chapter 4 • Substitute for, or check, results of IMP Sizing Calculator • Includes a project data summary to facilitate compilation of reports

  8. Ongoing Issues • Hydrograph Modification Management • Report and proposal due April 2013 • Present model verification monitoring results demonstrating that the IMPs are sufficiently overdesigned and perform to meet the 0.1Q2 low flow design criteria; or • Present study results of Contra Costa County streams geology and other factors that support the low flow design criteria of 0.2Q2 as the limiting HMP design low flow; or • Propose redesigns of the IMPs to meet the low flow design criteria of 0.1Q2 to be implemented during the next permit term. • Awaiting news on Prop. 84 grant application • Data will also be relevant re: infiltrationand evapotranspiration requirements

  9. Ongoing Issues • Feasibility/Infeasibility of Infiltration, Evapotranspiration, and Harvesting/Reuse • Response to Water Board staff comments on BASMAA submittal is pending BASMAA Board approval • Report on implementation experience is due December 1, 2013 • Documenting harvesting/reuse projects is important

  10. Recommendations • Approve the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook6th Edition and direct staff to publish it and the template on the Program website. • Direct staff to prepare and publish a new 2-page “Stormwater C.3 Update” summarizing policy changes

  11. Provision C.3 Reporting Annual and “Special Projects” CCCWP Management CommitteeFebruary 15, 2012

  12. Special Projects Reporting • Narrative discussion of onsite LID feasibility • Infiltration, evapotranspiration, harvesting/reuse per Stormwater C.3 Guidebook 6th Edition • Description of site and DMAs • Need for pavement where proposed • Why any landscaped areas can’t be bioretention • Narrative discussion of offsite LID feasibility • Owner owns land in same watershed? • In-lieu program exists? • Technical Criteria for Non-LID Facilities • Reference an existing certification program, or • Prepare our own minimum design criteria?

More Related