1 / 11

Early & Late Inflation Theory cf. CMB+LSS @ CITA

Early & Late Inflation Theory cf. CMB+LSS @ CITA. Concordance (pre-WMAP2++) & discordant notes. The “basic parameters”: LCDM with power law index and no/little GW is concordant. Some discord .. always. Extension to larger parameter lists.

mai
Télécharger la présentation

Early & Late Inflation Theory cf. CMB+LSS @ CITA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Early & Late Inflation Theory cf. CMB+LSS @ CITA Concordance (pre-WMAP2++) & discordant notes. The “basic parameters”: LCDM with power law index and no/little GW is concordant.Some discord .. always. Extension to larger parameter lists. Are current discordant notes statistically significant, systematics, astrophysics, fundamental physics? Add parameters: theory priors – cost function, baroqueness, taste? r_ts (<.72/<.36??), k_BSI, dn_s/dlnk, size_U/chi_U, subdominant (isoc/adiab), z_reh (+VMOs?) {e.g. Vaudrevange, Lewis, McDonald @ CITA/PI focus gp; soon Nolta WMAP2} Resolving (or celebrating) discord with planned experiments. break degeneracies of cosmic parameters planned CMB+ext, with ext= z-surveys, cl-gp surveys (Sunyaev-Zeldovich/Opt/X/weaklens), weak lensing LSS surveys, SN CMB High-L frontier TT: near term, cbipol, boom2Kpol, acbar forecasts. Long term Apex, ACT, SPT, Quiet forecasts. CMB Polarization EE/BB, High & Low-L: CBI, BOOM2K , DASI, CAPMap, WMAP2, BICEP, QUaD, Polarbear,QUIET,AMiBA, Planck, … CMBpol

  2. Anomalies: Systematics, Statistics, AstroPhysics or Fundamental Physics? “anomalies” @ low L 2,3; ~20-30; check@200, > 600? ET checkmarks 2, 22, 222, 2222 Issues: L=2,3 how low is the probability? Glitches? non-WMAP data e.g. Acbar/CBI calibration CBI anomalous power @ L > 2000, Sunyaev Zeldovich effect in the cosmic web is plausible ifs8if ~ 0.9(nonlinear gasdynamics) Statistical isotropy broken on large scales?

  3. Jan04 CMB data cf. good-fit LCDM uniform-acceleration model

  4. String Theory Landscape@ Stanford 100 Perhaps 10 different vacua

  5. single field inflation vs. WMAP1+ext+ext WMAP1 Peiris et al. 2003 Each point is a “viable slow-roll” model, able to sustain inflation for sufficient e-foldings to solve the horizon problem and make the Universe (nearly) flat BUT highly restricted. Monte Carlo simulations using “flow-equations” (Kinney 2002). slow-roll priors are artificial, highly restrictive & misleading about allowed inflationary phase space. Equivalent to a power series expansion of order 5, 6, 8 of histories. CITA approach: efficiently sampledinflation acceleration histories (trajectories). Physics priors: NONE - all are allowed (constrain by taste, e.g. allowed bumpiness). Only data can decide, includes very weak “priors” like “anthropic data” as well as high precision CMB+LSS. Monte Carlo simulation of acceleration histories

  6. String Theory Landscape& Inflation++ Phenomenology for CMB+LSS running index as simplest breaking (back to early 80s), radically broken scale invariance, 2+-field inflation, isocurvatures, Cosmic strings/defects, compactification & topology, & other baroque add-ons. subdominant String/Mtheory-motivated, extra dimensions, brane-ology, reflowering of inflaton/isocon models (includes curvaton), modified kinetic energies, k-essence, Dirac-Born-Infeld [sqrt(1-momentum**2), “DBI in the Sky” Silverstein etal 2004], etc. Potential of the Hybrid D3/D7 Inflation Model KKLT, KKLMMT any acceleration trajectory will do?? q (ln Ha) H(phi,…) V(phi,…) Measure?? anti-baroque prior 14 std inflation parameters + many many more e.g. “blind” search for patterns in the primordial power spectrum

  7. Running of the Spectral Index : Parameter Fits [Tegmark et al. astro-ph/0310723] [Spergel et al. ApJS, 148, 175] [Bond, Contaldi & Pogosyan astro-ph/0310735] [CBI VII, Readhead et al. astro-ph/0402359] CMB + weak lens s8 CMB data only [dns/dlnk] <0 in Jan03, Mar03 & Mar04

  8. PLANCK vs. WMAP4yr + Ground based telescopes (circa ~ 2008) • WMAP 4yr • + Ground-based telescopes pre-Planck ACT/SPT-like (bolometers) ; QUIET (HEMT arrays). Coverage assumed; ~few % of the sky (1000 sq deg); polarization included • PLANCK (2007+)

  9. END

  10. No running: dn/dlnk~0 Damped Lyman alpha system effect at small scales + increased WMAP errors at large scales of Slosar & Seljak 04 Systematic error budget? .. McDonald etal, Haehnelt etal

  11. acceleration trajectories, “featured” potentials, expansions about uniform q(T) (aka slow-roll-ology in the Hamilton-Jacobi/stochastic inflation formulation – works OK), … & the nonlocal WKB++ approximation (Habib etal 02,04) B+Contaldi+Kofman+Souradeep+Vaudrevange+

More Related