1 / 16

Barnier Bernard et al.

Impact of partial steps and momentum advection schemes in a global ocean circulation model at eddy- premitting resolution. Barnier Bernard et al. Outline. Introduction Model setting Model Result Effect of PS and EEN vorticity scheme Discussion and conclusion. Introduction.

maili
Télécharger la présentation

Barnier Bernard et al.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Impact of partial steps and momentum advection schemes in a global ocean circulation model at eddy-premitting resolution Barnier Bernard et al.

  2. Outline • Introduction • Model setting • Model Result • Effect of PS and EEN vorticity scheme • Discussion and conclusion

  3. Introduction • Christian Le Provost concern about the generation of eddies in the presence of topology. • Crucial importance of numeric on the realism of model solution. • Results were obtain by using a non-linear advection term and a partial step representation of bottom topology.

  4. Model setting • Global ¼° ORCA-R025 • C-grid • 80°S – 90°N (north hemisphere with two pole) • 1442*1021 grid point and 46 vertical level • Bottom topology use Etopo2 • Based on NEMO(Nucleus for European Modellong of the ocean) code • Ocean dynamic: NEMO-OPA

  5. Full Step(FS) and partial step(PS) • Full step • steps have the size of the model vertical levels. • approximates the true ocean depth to the closest model level. • Partial step • Make the depth of the bottom cell variable and adjustable to real depth of the ocean • It is possible to better represent small topographic slopes

  6. ENS and EEN • ENS • Used in former version of OPA • Converse of enstrophy in flows with no mass flux divergence(Sadoury ) • EEN(energy-enstrophy conserving) • An adaption of the scheme to primitive scheme (Arakawa and Lamb 1981) • Conserve total energy for general flow and potential enstrophy for flows with no mass flux divergence

  7. Domain setting Fig. 1 Domain decomposition on 186 processors of the DRAKKAR global 1/4° ocean circulation model ORCA-R025. Colors indicate the model bathymetry in meters. Every single box represents the domain accounted for by a processor. Boxes with a cross are “land processors” not retained in the calculation. Numbers in abscissa and ordinate indicate model grid points

  8. Model Result Fig. 2 Simulation G22 (partial step topography, new EEN vorticity scheme for momentum advection): snapshot of the sea surface height (ssh, in color) and ice cover (in white) in Austral winter in year 10 of the simulation

  9. Meridional overturning streamfunction Fig. 3 Meridional overturning streamfunction (in Sv) averaged over year 8 to 10 of the G22 simulation (PS + EEN) for the Atlantic (a) and the Indo-Pacific ocean basins (b). Contour interval is 2 Sv.

  10. Meridional heat transport Fig. 4 Meridional heat transport (in PW) averaged over year 8 to 10 of the G22 simulation for the Atlantic, Indo-Pacific, and Global oceans. The advective MHT (red curve) is calculated using a 5-day mean model meridional current velocities and temperatures. The surface flux MHT (blue curve) is calculated as the meridional integration of surface fluxes.

  11. Fig. 5 Global map of eddy kinetic energy (in cm2 s−2) in simulations G22 (3-year mean) and from satellite altimetry (Topex/Poseidon and ERS; Ducet et al. 2000)

  12. Difference among G22(PS+EEN), G03(FS+EEN) and G04(FS+ENS) Fig. 6 Difference in the mean barotropicstreamfunction (in Sv) between a simulations G22 and G04 indicating where both the partial step topography and EEN scheme play a role, and b between G03 and G04, both full step topography, indicating where advection scheme only has an impact. The red boxes identify the regions where model solution is compared to observation and other models. Color palette indicates Sv. Axes are subdivided by grid point numbers.

  13. Experiment Models

  14. Gulf Stream (SSH) Fig. 7 Estimates of mean sea surface height (mssh in cm) in the North Atlantic from a observations (Niiler et al. 2003), b global ORCA-R025 model simulation G22 (PS + EEN), c global OCCAM model simulation, d global ORCA-R025 model simulation G04 (FS + ENS), e global POP1/10, and f Atlantic CLIPPER ATL6.

  15. Gulf Stream(EKE) Fig. 8 Estimates of the mean eddy kinetic energy (eke in cm2 s−2) in the North Atlantic from a observations (Ducet et al. 2000), b global ORCA-R025 model simulation G22 (PS + EEN), c global OCCAM model simulation, d global ORCA-R025 model simulation G04 (FS + ENS), e global POP1/10, and f Atlantic CLIPPER ATL6 model simulation. All model results present a 3-year mean

  16. Conclusion • The use of PS and EEN scheme dramatically affect the model result. • EEN scheme with PS yields a remarkable improvement in the major circulation patterns. • With these improvement, eddy-premitting model can obtain better results than some high-resolution model.

More Related