1 / 10

Do Animals Have Rights?

Do Animals Have Rights?. Regan vs. Warren. Steve Jobs Joe Blow BDO / Chimp Dolphin Dog Tuna Clam. Subjects of a life*. Equal inherent value. Equal right to be treated with respect. OBJECTIONS?.

malo
Télécharger la présentation

Do Animals Have Rights?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Do Animals Have Rights? Regan vs. Warren

  2. Steve Jobs Joe Blow BDO / Chimp Dolphin Dog Tuna Clam Subjects of a life* Equal inherent value Equal right to be treated with respect OBJECTIONS? 1. All humans have equal inherent value equally, and thus an equal right to be treated with respect. 2. Considering the variety of humans with equal inherent value, inherent value must be based on the simple fact of being a subject of a life. 3. Many animals are subjects of a life too. C. Many animals have inherent value and a right to be treated with respect equal to ours. * A “subject of a life” (SOAL) has sentience (experiences), feels pain and pleasure, has a point of view, has a life that can go well or badly

  3. Warren’s Objections REGAN WARREN What is inherent value? Regan never really explains. Why think it’s equal in chimps, dolphins, dogs, squirrels, fish, etc? Why think inherent value generates rights at all? What’s the connection? Equal inherent value Equal rights

  4. The basis of “strong” rights X and Y are rational persons and would agree not to kill each other X has a right not to be killed by Y and vice versa NOTE: (1) Regan thinks about animals from a rights perspective, but rejects the social contract perspective (“ contractarianism”) (2) Warren is embracing a rights perspective and explaining rights in a roughly contractarian fashion

  5. Why animals don’t have “strong” rights The shark is not a rational person and cannot make an agreement with the man The shark has no rights to anything from the man

  6. Strong vs Weak Rights STRONG RIGHTS—Absolute, not overridable WEAK RIGHTS—More overridable than strong rights Based on sentience—if X feels pain, we shouldn’t hurt X unless we have a very good reason • Basic: based on agreements between rational persons • Borrowed: based on the agreements of others—e.g. I’ll protect your baby (or cat) if you protect mine WHAT WOULD REGAN SAY?

  7. Regan’s Reply to Warren • babies have strong rights that are not “borrowed” or derivative or secondary in any sense (our duties to babies are not “indirect”) • so babies’ rights must be based on their own inherent value, not the agreements of others • inherent value is the same in all humans, however they may differ in intelligence, etc. • so the baby’s inherent value must be due simply to the baby being a SOAL • but many animals are SOALs too • so they have inherent value too • so they have strong rights too

  8. Beyond Singer, Regan, Warren:Sliding Scale View • humans have strong rights, based on rational agreement • human babies have strong rights too, but they’re borrowed, not basic • inherent value varies, just as Warren says (she drops that point) • amount of inherent value affects strength of an animal’s rights

  9. Green Animal Rescue:often “sliding scale” • chimpanzees • elephants • whales • dolphins • see movie • my book -- Animalkind: What We Owe to Animals (at amazon)

  10. Next question about what matters What about whole species? “The Tiger” as opposed to individual tigers? Could plants have intrinsic value? What about whole ecosystems?

More Related