1 / 40

The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed: How Well Are We Measuring Snow?

The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed: How Well Are We Measuring Snow?. Roy Rasmussen 1 , Bruce Baker 2 , John Kochendorfer 2 , Tilden Myers 2 , Scott Landolt 1 , Alex Fisher 3 , Jenny Black 1 , Julie Theriault 1 , Paul Kucera 1 , David Gochis 1 , Craig Smith 3 ,

manasa
Télécharger la présentation

The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed: How Well Are We Measuring Snow?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed:How Well Are We Measuring Snow? Roy Rasmussen1, Bruce Baker2, John Kochendorfer2, Tilden Myers2, Scott Landolt1, Alex Fisher3, Jenny Black1, Julie Theriault1, Paul Kucera1, David Gochis1, Craig Smith3, Rodica Nitu3,Mark Hall2,Steve Cristanelli1 and Ethan Gutmann1 1. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) 2. NOAA 3. Environment Canada t

  2. Winter Weather Nowcasting for transportation requires real-time liquid equivalent measurements!

  3. January

  4. How will snowfall rates change in the future? April

  5. The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed was initially established in 1991 at NCAR in Boulder, Colorado to address FAA needs for real-time snowfall rates in support of ground deicing The NOAA Climate Reference Network program started using the site in the late 90’s to evaluate snow measuring instrumentation for climate purposes.

  6. Challenges of automatic snow fall rate measurements: • Wind under-catch • - Gauge acting as obstacle to the flow, generating updrafts • Cap over of the orifice by snow accumulating on the gauge • Minimum detectable signal often large (to overcome noise) • Minimum detectable signal impacted by wind speed (higher the wind, the larger the minimum detectable signal) • Eliminating blowing snow false accumulations • High maintenance • Need to empty the bucket after snow fills up and refill bucket with glycol and oil.

  7. Updraft generated upstream of gauge

  8. Methods devised to solve the challenges: • Wind effect: • - Wind shields used to prevent updrafts from forming over weighing gauges. • Orifice blocking effect • - Heaters used to prevent snow build up on the body of the gauge. • Reduce minimum detectable signal by software and hardware: • Improved software to reduce false tips by vibration. • Improved hardware to eliminate vibrations and other noise. • 4. Reduce the minimum detectable signals increase with wind speed • Use wind shields that have high efficiency (e.g. WMO Double Fence Intercomparison Reference Shield)

  9. Deployed multiple Double Fence Inter-comparison Reference (DFIR) shields as “truth” gauge Insert image of the Marshall site with DFIR

  10. Layout of site: Flat and level site located 7 km south of Boulder, Colorado NCAR owned and operated with security fence

  11. Aerial View of the NOAA/FAA/NCAR Test site

  12. View of test site to the South

  13. View of test site towards the West

  14. Developed and tested double Alter shield

  15. Developed and tested 2/3 DFIR shield (CRN)

  16. Developed and tested hotplate snowgauge

  17. Testing multiple hotplates

  18. Documented snow under-catch behavior of various shields and gauges Hotplate DFIR Small DFIR Wind speed Double Alter Single Alter

  19. Established transfer functions for various shields

  20. Established transfer functions for various shields and gauges

  21. Data used to develop transfer function shows significant scatter!

  22. Thank You! Rasmussen et al. 2001

  23. Mapped airflow around shields/gauges using sonic anemometers and numerical modeling

  24. 1.7 mm/hr Moderate LGT MOD HVY Established that visibility is a poor method to estimate the liquid equivalent rate of snow (light, moderate, heavy)

  25. Developed and tested the Liquid Water Equivalent system for ground deicing use

  26. Precipitation Type sensor (HSS) Precipitation Type sensor (Vaisala PWD-22) Moderate Snow Snow Liquid Water Equivalent System WXT temperature, humidity, and wind sensor (Vaisala) Hotplate (Yankee) Liquid Equivalent snowfall rate determination Weighing Snowgauge (GEONOR)

  27. Developed method to heat the orifice of a gauge using temperature controlled heat tape (max temperature 2 ˚C)

  28. Accurate snow depth measurements remain a challenge!

  29. Measured snow particle size distribution using video disdrometer

  30. Disdrometer Observations 2DVD Specifications Measurement area = 10 cm x 10 cm Scan rate = 51.3 kHz Horizontal resolution = 0.15 mm Vertical resolution = 0.03 mm for snowflakes, 0.1 mm for raindrops Particle Characteristics Height and width Volume Terminal velocity Front view Side view ~4 mm [mm] [mm]

  31. Rain Period: 1230 (17 March)-0200 UTC (18 March) Terminal Velocity vs Equ. Diameter 2100-2400 UTC 17 March Hydrometeor Size Distribution 2225-2300 UTC 17 March

  32. Mixed Phase Period: 0200-0630 UTC Decreasing temperature Terminal Velocity vs Equ. Diameter 0200-0600 UTC Hydrometeor Size Distribution 0515-0520 UTC

  33. Partially-Melted Snow Period : 2020 UTC- Temperature >0oC; Temporal maximum temperature Terminal Velocity vs Equ. Diameter 2200-2300 UTC Hydrometeor Size Distribution Crystal Types: Irregulars (hvy) 1-2 mm Spatial dendrites /snow grains (hvy) <1-2 mm Plates (lgt-mod) <1-2 mm Needles (mod) 2-4 mm Stellars (mod) <1-2 mm Aggregrate sizes 2-8 mm 2125-2130 UTC

  34. Snow Period: -2020 UTCTemperature slightly above 0oC; Small crystals Terminal Velocity vs Equ. Diameter 1100-1200 UTC 1900-2000 UTC Hydrometeor Size Distribution Crystal Type: Irregulars (hvy) 1-2 mm Aggregrate sizes 3-4 mm 1950-1955 UTC

  35. Measured vertical profile of precipitation using K-band radar

  36. Aircraft Deicing Fluid testing

  37. Summary • The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed has been used to investigate a number of important aspects of winter precipitation: • Under-catch of snow as a function of shield type and the development of transfer functions • Develop and test new wind shields • Evaluate the use of various gauge/shield combinations for both real-time and climate snow measurements. • Develop and test new precipitation instruments (hotplate) • Real-time measurement of snow for aircraft ground deicing purposes • The use of visibility to measure snow intensity • Snow size distributions and terminal velocity • Radar- reflectivity snowfall relationships

  38. Summary • How well are we measuring snow? • While advances in shields and gauges have been made, we still don’t fully understand the significant scatter in the data nor have we designed the perfect wind shield to reduce the scatter. • Need to use direct measurements of the liquid equivalent rate of snow to estimate snow intensity in METARs rather than use visibility • The automated measurement of precipitation type and snow depth remains a significant challenge.

  39. Thank You!

More Related