1 / 34

State Education Initiatives

State Education Initiatives. Annual Spring Fiscal Workshop April-May 2013. TDOE / District Budgets. 2. State appropriations for K-12 education have increased substantially over the past three years. Education revenues have increased. K-12 education: + $189 million

mandel
Télécharger la présentation

State Education Initiatives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State Education Initiatives Annual Spring Fiscal Workshop April-May 2013

  2. TDOE / District Budgets 2

  3. State appropriations for K-12 education have increased substantially over the past three years

  4. Education revenues have increased • K-12 education: + $189 million • Other departments: ‒ $140 million • Highlights in K-12 Education budget proposal • Capital outlay restoration = $34 million • LEA technology = $51 million (one-time) • BEP salary improvement = $36 million (1.5%) • BEP growth = $43 million

  5. Sequestration: Impact to federal funds for education • Sequestration effective March 1 • It will affect district funding as of July 1, 2013 • (when the funds for the next fiscal year begin). • The current projection is a reduction of 5.1 percent on average • Applies to Title I, IDEA, Perkins, 21st Century

  6. ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS 2011-2012

  7. The accountability system under the waiverhas two main objectives Growth for all students, every year and Closing achievement gaps, by ensuring faster growth for those students who are furthest behind

  8. There were four possible outcomes for districts, based on a totality of results 8

  9. Of 54 districts in need of sub-group improvement, 36 struggled with students with disabilities

  10. Our goal is to be the fastest improving state • This will be measured by our • results on: • NAEP • ACT • PARCC • TN currently ranks 19th out of 22 • PARCC states (on NAEP.) • Ourgoal, during the first year • of PARCC, is to come in at least 12th.

  11. We have seen continued growth on TCAP 3-8 Achievement results over the past two years

  12. We have also seen improvement on most high school End of Course tests

  13. State Level Transformation of Services to Support District Needs April 2013

  14. Departmental • Special Populations • Curriculum and Instruction • Career Technical Education • Consolidated Planning and Monitoring • Consolidated Finance • CORE offices – district support

  15. State Level Transformation of Services Division of Special Populations • Staffing Restructure to focus on instruction • Inclusion of SWD scores in teacher effect data • Testing Guidance • Identification of SLD / RTI

  16. Staffing Restructure Special Populations • Assistant Commissioner Joey Hassell • Goal to create a TDOE structure to support district performance • Special Education • Director of District Data • Director of Instructional Programming • Federal Programs • Title I • Homeless, Migrant, ELL • Special Schools • TN Early Intervention Services

  17. Moving forward, we want to ensure students with disabilities are included in TVAAS calculations • Bill number SB 156/HB 150. • Removes prohibition on including SWD in individual growth calculations. • The Tennessee Advisory Council for the Education of Students with Disabilities has endorsed this revision. • Allows 8% more teachers to own their TVAAS data • Sends the important message that all kids count • In more than 97% of cases, teachers would have received the same teacher effect score with the inclusion of special education students

  18. Standardized Testing GuidanceModified Assessments for Students with Disabilities • Modified assessments designed for most severely disabled students • 1% of students in tested grades eligible for Portfolio • 2% of students in tested grades eligible for MAAS When too many SWD are P/A on MAAS, they are reassigned randomly as BP • 2012-13 - SWD who were proficient or advanced on MAAS last year, • Where districts exceed the cap, students P/A, were reassigned to TCAP • Systems that did not exceed the cap were permitted retest options The last year for TN MAAS is 2013-14

  19. Amending Special Education Guidelines and Standards Regarding Evaluations for SLD • Proposed revision requires the districts assure that underachievement is not due to lack of instruction • Data must demonstrate that rigorous systematic instruction is evident throughout all tiers • Timeline • Jan 2013 – Advisory Council for Education of SWD affirmed action • Feb 2013 – SBE hears guidelines on first reading • March 2013 – SBE conducted rulemaking hearing • April 2013– SBE hears guidelines (revised) first reading • July 2013– SBE hears guidelines second reading • July 2014 – effective date of implementation

  20. Division of Curriculum and Instruction • Common Core Implementation • Assessment Design – PARCC • Professional Development • RTI supports

  21. Notes on Common Core State Standards • Standards articulate core expectations but do not define curriculum. Curriculum will continue to be locally controlled. • The adoption of Common Core State Standards does not change the graduation requirements outlined in the Tennessee Diploma Project. • Common Core State Standards implementation began during the 2011-2012 School Year. • 2011-2012 School Year: K-2 Implementation • Summer 2012: Trained 13,000 educators • 2012-2013 School Year: Partial Implementation 3-8 Math, 62 Districts in ELA Pilot • Summer 2013: Will train 35,000 educators (27,000 currently registered) • 2013-2014 School Year: Full Implementation K-12 Math and ELA • 2014-2015: Transition from TCAP to PARCC Assessment

  22. PARCC will be given in two sessions Traditional Schedule PBA End of Year Feb/ March April / May High School Block Option PBA I PBA II EOC I EOC II Oct / Nov Dec /Jan Feb/ March April / May

  23. PARCC Design

  24. Preparing for PARCC requires operational preparation and instructional shifts

  25. Training Summary

  26. TN RTI Model

  27. Division of Career and Technical • Transitioned to 16 nationally recognized career clusters supported by industry advisory councils to strengthen career pathways • Streamlined and revised CTE teacher licensure process • Programs of Study and accompanying courses that are rigorous, relevant, learner-focused, and aligned to CCSS • Office of Postsecondary Coordination & Alignment to promote participation in early postsecondary offerings • Pathways Tennessee - establishes 7th–14th/16thacademic pathways, linked to local, regional, and state labor market needs and trends.

  28. Consolidated Planning and MonitoringConsolidated Finance Rationale • Better support districts in meeting ambitious goals for overall growth and gap closure • Streamline work in all aspects of monitoring and compliance • Increases focus on academic support for districts • Analyzing and utilizing all of available financial resources • Districts will continue to be supported throughout the transition in planning, monitoring and finance. • AJT and CORE staff will be available in the processes of closing out district finances and developing spending plans for 2013-14.

  29. Division of Consolidated Planning and Monitoring • Consolidated Planning process • Spring 2013 - Federal and IDEA • Spring 2014 – addition of CTE, PK • Consolidated Monitoring process • 2013-14 School year - • Desktop review of federal processes • Revised and reduced paperwork for districts • Upload – inventories, budgets, amendments, personnel lists • Cyclical monitoring vs. Focus monitoring

  30. Consolidated Planning and Monitoring March 2013-June 2013 • Restructure of ESEA / IDEA planning and monitoring leadership • Introduction of HMB planning tool for ESEA and IDEA July 2013-June 2014 • Possible inclusion of CTE and PK in planning process • Possible shift to HMB monitoring tool for ESEA and IDEA July 2014 • Possible inclusion of other divisions in offices of planning and monitoring

  31. Division of Consolidated Planning and Monitoring 2013-2014 Kathleen Airhart Deputy Commissioner TBA Director Consolidated Planning and Monitoring Internal Audit Nan McKerley Director IDEA Accountability Eve Carney Director Federal Programs Accountability TBA IDEA/ Federal Accountability Planning and Monitoring Hiram Tate IDEA/Federal Accountability Planning and Monitoring Deryl Gentry IDEA/Federal Accountability Planning and Monitoring Nina Murphy IDEA/Federal Accountability Administrative Support Valerie Starks IDEA/Federal Accountability Administrative Support

  32. Division of Consolidated Finance • Bringing together 6 divisions under coordinated leadership • Local finance • TDOE accounting / fiscal • State • IDEA • ESEA • Perkins • Other – PK, miscellaneous grants

  33. Staffing Restructure CORE Office • Chief District Support Officer Ken Green • CORE goal is to create a TDOE structure to support district performance • 8 regional CORE Offices • Director of CORE office • Data Specialist - Consolidated Planning • Instructional staff – math, reading, intervention • Compliance staff – Consolidated Fiscal, Consolidated Monitoring • Other Consultants – CTE, ECE evaluator, USDA (food services)

More Related