1 / 11

NO x Emission Inversion Using the Adjoint of CMAQ

NO x Emission Inversion Using the Adjoint of CMAQ. Farid Amid and Amir Hakami. Carleton University. Overview. - Inversion Methodology OMI retrievals Observational operators Adjoint inversion Category-specific emission inversion - Results. Adjoint-based inversion. Observations.

Télécharger la présentation

NO x Emission Inversion Using the Adjoint of CMAQ

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NOx Emission Inversion Using the Adjoint of CMAQ Farid Amid and Amir Hakami Carleton University

  2. Overview - Inversion Methodology • OMI retrievals • Observational operators • Adjoint inversion • Category-specific emission inversion - Results Oct 20, 2009

  3. Adjoint-based inversion Observations Forward Model Adjustments (Final) Cost/Forcing Adjoint Model Optimization Gradients • Grid-based emission inference Oct 20, 2009

  4. Model application • North America • 36 km • 13 layers • Summer of 2007 • OMI NO2 column and surface ozone • For now won’t use surface NO2 • Category-specific as much as possible • SAPRC-99 • Parallel (?) • Bott scheme (?) Oct 20, 2009

  5. OMI retrievals • KNMI product • Filtered to remove • Large pixels (> 36 km) • High errors (> 70%) • Domain edge (?) • Horizontal and vertical regridding (mapping) • Observational operators Oct 20, 2009

  6. Domain regridding (forward and backward) Averaging Kernel -- A VCDCMAQ AT CMAQ forcing VCDCMAQ- VCDOMI Oct 20, 2009

  7. Category-specific inversion • Grid-based inversion does not distinguish between source categories when sources are collocated in one grid. • Emission adjustments are only applied to the total emissions, i.e. adjoint gradients are scaled by emission shares. • Not necessarily a problem • It would be useful to track areas where specific sources dominate. Oct 20, 2009

  8. Source contributions to the gradients C A B B Oct 20, 2009

  9. Forward sensitivity analysis • Using DDM for screening receptor sites where a single source category dominates (NO2 sensitivity wrt to anthropogenic NOx emissions) Oct 20, 2009

  10. Steps • Identify sources with potentially high spatial correlation in emission bias. • Natural sources, mobile (?) • Screen for receptors where these sources dominate. • Invert for those emissions. • Extend the adjustments to other locations. • Invert for other sources. Oct 20, 2009

  11. Conclusions • Spatial correlations that are intuitive are a potential source of information which should not be neglected, particularly in absence of good understanding of the true covariance matrices. • Such information can be applied to distinguish between sources using forward sensitivities. • Major sources are typically collocated. • NO2 may not be the best candidate for this type of analysis (biogenics?) Oct 20, 2009

More Related