1 / 27

Citizenship, Social Inclusion and Difference

Citizenship, Social Inclusion and Difference. Welcome. Background to this course. Background to this course. Community, Self and Identity Initiative. Stellenbosch University: Psychology Fourth Year . UWC: Social Work Fourth Year Occupational Therapy Fourth Year.

mardi
Télécharger la présentation

Citizenship, Social Inclusion and Difference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Citizenship, Social Inclusion and Difference Welcome

  2. Background to this course

  3. Background to this course Community, Self and Identity Initiative Stellenbosch University: Psychology Fourth Year UWC: Social Work Fourth Year Occupational Therapy Fourth Year

  4. Our “Pedagogy of Discomfort” “Would you recommend repeating the idea of learning with students from another university?” 84 – yes; 1 – no. “Would you recommend repeating the idea of learning with students from another discipline?” 83 – yes; 1 – no. “Would you recommend using a mix of workshops and electronic communication?” 77 – yes; 7 – no; 2 – maybe.

  5. Concern with sustainability

  6. Our Research Journey

  7. Our abiding conviction The teacher is implicated within the social and pedagogical narrative, not some empowered educator who has figured out the problems of an unequal world and stands to dispense this wisdom to receiving students. … the teachers are themselves carriers of troubled knowledge, and this has serious implications for critical education. Jonathan Jansen (2009) Knowledge I in the Blood; Confronting Race and the Apartheid Past. Cape Town: UCT Press

  8. Aims of this course • That you should benefit by • Deepening your learning about diversity and difference in higher education teaching and learning • Enhancing your reflexivity and your capacity to harness critical questioning as a helpful resource in higher education • Reducing isolation and creating community across boundaries of discipline and institution • Learning more about technologies (both electronic and participatory) for creating and sustaining communities • Engaging in the scholarship of learning and teaching

  9. Course Aims and Outcomes • By the end of this short course, you will be able to: • Communicate using face-to-face and online modalities with colleagues from a range of higher education institutions • Apply particular Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) techniques • Critique current approaches towards difference, inclusion and citizenship education • Demonstrate reflexivity in relation to own teaching and learning context • Apply understanding about difference, inclusion and citizenship to own teaching and learning context

  10. Course in brief Workshops 7 March 2011 Initial face-to-face workshop 1 April 2011 Second face-to-face workshop 6 May 2010 Third face-to-face workshop Assignments 22 March 2011 Assignment One (online discussion forum on PLA) 15 April 2011 Assignment Two (blog on the pedagogy of discomfort) 6 May 2011 Assignment Three (presentation) due 13 May 2011 Assignment Four (digitalisation of presentation) 27 May 2011 Assignment Five (reflective piece)

  11. Groups Group One Group Two Roisin Kelly Patricia Lenaghan Nicolette Roman Jean Farmer Jill van Dugteren KasturiBehari-leak Lana van Niekerk SomekaNgece Wessel le Roux Daniela Gachago Melanie Alperstein

  12. Evaluation • Pilot (evaluation) • Evaluation forms • Reflective essays • Our own observations

  13. Definition of terms • Citizenship • Social Inclusion • Difference

  14. Teaching about difference • Complementarity of Recognition and Distribution (Nancy Fraser, 2003)

  15. Critical Education • All things to all people • Expose relations of power and inequality • “fundamental transformations of the underlying epistemological and ideological assumptions that are made about what counts as “official” or legitimate knowledge and who holds it” (Apple, Au and Gandin, 2009) • Bear witness to negativity • But point to contradictions and possible spaces for action • Build a “decentred unity” that tries to work across differences: race, class, gender, etc

  16. Critical Race Theory • Origin: in Critical Legal Studies • CRT made race a central feature • Critique of liberalism • US society based on property rights • And whiteness as a form of property – real or: “thus, intellectual property must be undergirded by “real” property” science labs, computers and other state-of-the-art technologies, and appropriately certified and prepared teachers” (Ladson-Billings and Tate, 2006, p. 18)

  17. Critical Race Theory • “Race still matters” • “There are no neighborhoods or communities to which women and girls are restricted. We cannot locate comparable statistics that indicate that people of one particular religious group were performing worse than any other group”. (Ladson-Billings, p. 115) • Possibilities for hope: “insistence on story-telling and counter narratives provides us with a powerful vehicle for speaking against racism and other forms of inequity”.

  18. Critiques of “whiteness” • “Being White is not the problem. Being a White racist is.” Zeus Leonardo, p. 127. • “Because whiteness is a social construction, a range of possibilities is opened up for White agency”. • “Rather than erase these inscriptions as a first step, we need a period of reinscription to redescribe and reunderstand what we see when we see race”. (p. 135)

  19. …Thus the significance of reflexivity • Taylor and White, 2000:198, cite Fox: reflexivity “interrogates the process by which interpretation has been fabricated: reflexivity requires any effort to describe or represent to consider how that process of description was achieved, what claims to ‘presence’ were made, what authority was used to claim knowledge”. • Crabtree and Sapp cite Fransman: "epistemological reflexivity” is required if teachers are to be enabled to transform existing power relations, transcend cultural divides, and undo collectively-ingrained biases"(Fransman, 2003, p.11). • Giddens (1991) refers to “reflexivity” to mobilise the self: "develops ethics concerning the issue 'how should we live?’”

  20. And Social Justice Teacher Education Teachers should • Be socioculturally conscious – recognize that there are multiple ways of perceiving reality that are influenced by one’s location in the social order • Use their knowledge about the lives of their students to design instruction that builds on what they already know while stretching them beyond the familiar (Zeichner, p. 297-8)

  21. And Social Justice Teacher Education Zeichner cont. • Have an affirming view of students from diverse backgrounds, seeing resources for learning in all students rather than viewing differences as problems to overcome • Understand how learners construct knowledge and be capable of promoting learners’ knowledge construction

  22. Critical reflection – Paulo Freire “all educational practice requires the existence of ‘subjects’, who while teaching, learn. And who in learning also teach”. Cited in Au, p. 222. Problem posing: asking critical questions of the world and critically reflecting on what actions they may take to change those material conditions. Dialogue: moment where humans meet to reflect on reality… improve their knowledge and improve their ability to transform reality. Cited in Au pl. 222.

  23. The transformative power of emotions • Emotions are classed (Boler, 1999) • Zembylas: “affective economies may establish, assert, subvert or reinforce power differentials” (2007, p. xiv) • Emotions can be destructive as well as productive: moral anger. • Critical hope: Critical and connection with the other.

  24. Emotions cont. “Affective connections may call attention to a group’s demand for respect and recognition, but also highlight inequalities more generally. On the other hand, such affective connections in and of themselves are not a substitute for structural change.” (2007,p. xxii) “Not ‘What do I feel’ but rather, ‘what do I do with what I feel?’”

  25. A “pedagogy of discomfort” Boler and Zembylas: “A pedagogy of discomfort recognizes and problematises the deeply embedded emotional dimensions that frame and shape daily habits, routines, and unconscious complicity with hegemony”. (2003, p. 111) “no on escapes hegemony: we are all discomforted” (p. 115) invites criticality and creativity.

  26. Other key ideas • Interdisciplinarity Michael Davidson (2004, p.307): talking and exploring in an interdisciplinary setting “critical interdisciplinarity calls for both the recognition of and the decentring of the disciplinary self” • Multi-modality (refer back to Zeichner)

  27. The significance of “process” Joan Anyon: importance of “process” and “participation” for students

More Related