40 likes | 168 Vues
The 7th Annual Partners for Measles Advocacy Meeting focused on improving the quality of Supplementary Immunization Activities (SIAs). Panelists, including experts from CDC, WHO, and other organizations, discussed key issues defining "quality" in SIAs, such as achieving high and uniform coverage while minimizing adverse events. They addressed the challenges faced, including low coverage in certain districts, operational problems, and the need for better integration of measles campaigns with other health initiatives. Lessons learned and best practices were shared to enhance future SIAs.
E N D
Improving SIA Quality:Lessons Learned Partners for Measles Advocacy 7th Annual Meeting
Panel Participants • Robert Perry (CDC) • Casey Boudreau (WHO / AFRO) • Marcy Erskine (CRC) • Lynda Foray (Sierra Leone MoH) • Stefan Hoyer (IFRC) • Monique Petrofsky (CDC)
The Issues • What is “quality” • High coverage • Uniform coverage (across districts) • Few adverse events • Previous SIAs good quality • New round of (follow-up) campaigns • More campaigns integrating ITNs
Recent Challenges • SIA coverage low not uniform in all districts • Outbreaks in year before follow-up SIAs • Recurring operational / technical problems • Bumps in the road to integration • Challenge in bringing all partners to the table • Integrating with OPV vs. measles SIAs • Delay in Kenya measles SIA to allow integration • Ghana measles SIA had low coverage in age groups not included in ITN distribution