1 / 17

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013. Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Specialists. Training Overview. For separate modules: Module 1: Introduction to DPAS II Module 2: DPAS II and the Delaware Framework Module 3: The DPAS II Process

Télécharger la présentation

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for SpecialistsAugust 2013 Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Specialists

  2. Training Overview • For separate modules: • Module 1: Introduction to DPAS II • Module 2: DPAS II and the Delaware Framework • Module 3: The DPAS II Process • Module 4: Component Five – Student Improvement

  3. Materials for this module • Power Point Presentation • DPAS II Guide for Specialists http://www.doe.k12.de.us/csa/dpasii/default.shtml.

  4. DPAS II: Process • Roster Identification • Measures Selection • Fall Conference • Pre-Observation Conference • Observation

  5. DPAS II: Process (continued) • Post-Observation Conference • Formative Feedback Documentation • Summative Evaluation Conference • Summative Evaluation Documentation

  6. DPAS II: Process (continued) • Improvement Plans • Effective 2013-2014, changes to Regulation 106A modifies when an Improvement Plan must be developed versus may be developed. • Changes to Regulation also eliminate some requirements related to Professional Development completed by a teacher during an Improvement Plan. • The Challenge Process

  7. Professional Responsibilities • Form completed in Fall • Discussions held during pre and post-observation conferences • Discussion during summative evaluation conference

  8. Pre-observation • Form • Required for Novice Teachers • May be waived for Experienced Teachers • Only if both the teacher and evaluator agree • Conference • Required for all announced observations – may not be waived • Does not apply to unannounced observations • Whenever possible, held in teacher’s classroom or work area

  9. Observations • Announced or Unannounced • Length of observation • Frequency of observations • Limitations on when observations may occur • Evidence collection

  10. Post-observation Conference • Requirements • Teacher Responsibilities • Lesson Reflection Template - optional • Timing

  11. Formative Feedback • Requirements and Timeline • Evidence • Formative rating documentation • How do rubric levels translate to Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory performance?

  12. Summative Evaluation • Requirements and Timelines • Evidence • Summative ratings • Summative evaluation forms

  13. Summative Ratings Chart

  14. Pattern of Ineffective Teaching

  15. Overall Feedback • Commendations • Recommendations and expectations • Difference between expectations and recommendations • How expectations are communicated • How evaluators asses teacher performance toward expectation outcomes • Documenting completed expectations • Additional feedback

  16. Challenge Process • Used when a specialist disagrees with the evaluator’s assessment • Different from Grievance (can only grieve process infractions) • Must try to resolve difference with evaluator first • Submit written challenge to evaluator’s supervisor within 1 working days of receipt of evaluation document • Within 15 working days the supervisor of the evaluator must meet with the specialist • Within 15 work days the supervisor of the evaluator must issue a written decision

  17. DOE monitoring of DPAS II • Annual audit of DPAS II formative and summative evaluation documents • Conducted by DOE staff • All information is strictly confidential • Use of review criteria to ensure written evaluation documents provide • Objective, specific, and relevant evidence of teacher performance and areas for commendation • Supportive, specific, and actionable guidance, including timelines, for any recommendations and/or expectations

More Related