1 / 14

Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension (ESA Cosmic Vision 2015-2025)

Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension (ESA Cosmic Vision 2015-2025). or the Compton Scattering polarimetery challenges. Ezio Caroli, INAF/IASF – Sezione di Bologna. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension.

marshall-george
Télécharger la présentation

Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension (ESA Cosmic Vision 2015-2025)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension(ESA Cosmic Vision 2015-2025) or the Compton Scattering polarimetery challenges Ezio Caroli, INAF/IASF – Sezione di Bologna

  2. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension Conventional analysis (imaging, spectroscopy and timing) of the high energy radiation from cosmic ray sources often provides two or more different models that successfully explain the observations; The combined measurement of polarization angle and degree of linear polarization can provide vital extra informationto discrimate among the models. • Solar FlaresSolar flare emission is contaminated by thermal emission at lower energies and by lines above 1 MeV, the best energy range for polarimetry investigation from solar flares is from 0.1-1 MeV.Models for solar flares predict polarization levels as high as 20 or 30% in this energy band. • Gamma-ray Bursts. Since the peak energy of the GRB spectrum is narrowly distributed at ~ 250 keV, Compton polarimetry is clearly a requirement for this topic. A high level of polarization (>50%) is expected in GRB if the prompt emission, as recently suggested, is the result of a relativistic expansion of strongly magnetized electron-positron plasmas; in the standard (internal-external shock) model, polarization levels of about 10-20% are expected • Other possible sourcesPulsars: hard X-ray polarimetry to understand the extent to which gamma-ray photons are related to those at longer wavelengths (e.g. a polarisation level >20% is expected from the CRAB pulsar). Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters:one by-product of magnetic photon splitting (50-500 keV) is that the reprocessed photons would exhibit a polarization level of ~25%. Massive Black Hole: the geometry of the the accretion disk; For optical thin disks polarization levels as high as 30-60% are possible while in the optically thick regime lower levels (~10%) are predicted. E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  3. Polarisation direction  Q factor  (°) Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension Klein-Nishina cross-section for linearly polarized photons: E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  4. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension • Advantages of a ‘thick’ pixel detectors: • Each element of the dectection plane is both a scatterer and a detector. Therefore all the sensitive area is used as polarimeter • The geometry of the detector select only events with a scattering angle close to 90º. For these scattering angles we have the best modulation factor. E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  5. Thickness (mm) Pixel (mm2) Bias (V/mm) Resistivity (.cm) D.C. (nA) 3.4 – 5 – 7.5 2.5  2.5 ~100 1 – 5 x109 20 - 40 CSP Model Eurorad PR-304 Sensitivity 2 V/pC Sensitivity vs photon energy 70 mV/MeV Rise time < 200 ns Equivalent noise < 3 keV Bias +/- 12 V Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension The POLCA pixellated CdTe detectors Experiment at the beam line ID15 of the ESRF in July 2002 E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  6. Allows extrapolation to a 7x7 matrix Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension POLCA: Experiment at the beam line ID15 of the ESRF in July 2002 • Corner pixel irradiaton • Rotation of the 4x4 matrix • 90° double events distribution symmetry E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  7. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension The single events are used to correct the double counts maps for pixel response non uniformity in order to reduce sistematics effects on the evaluation of the Q factor: Nx/y = Mx/y x Nt/Nsxy M = detected double events Nt = Total events Ns = Single events Single events Double events E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  8. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension POLCA experiment POLCA 7.5 mm 300 keV Monte Carlo MC 7.5 mm 300 keV E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  9. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension Q Factor in function of energy for CIPHER telescope in the following cases: excluding only central pixel double events, excluding additional first order pixels double events, and additionally second order pixels double events E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  10. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension Minimum Detectable Polarisation The MDP calculated for the CIPHER (160 cm2) telescope when irradiated by a Crab emission flux in presence of a background noise measured by HEXIS instrument (full active shielding configuration). MDP=5% in 10000 s. E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  11. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension Polarimetric Sensitivity for CIPHER geometry The polarimetric sensitivity is (3σ, 15000 s): ~20 mCrab over the 40-1000 keV range Crab (10% polarized), 3 hours E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  12. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension Laue Lens Telescope The lens does not affect the linear polarisation status of the incidence beam (Frontera et al., SPIE 1995) • Focal plane detector requirements: • Sensitive area ≈ 50 cm2 • Efficient at high energy (from 60 to 400 keV) therefore a CdTe thickness from 3 to 10 mm is required, • Pixel size at mm level because the expected point spread function is about 10 mm (FWHM) for photon energies of about 200 keV. • A possible implementation: 32×32 CdTe pixels, where each pixel has a 2×2 mm2 surface area and pixel thickness limits from a least 3 mm up to 10 mm. E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

  13. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension Lens aperture:400 cm2; Focal length 10 m Double events map for a Crab like incidence (100% polarized) flux in the 60-400 keV range Polarisation direction 100 1000 10000 E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna Polarization direction Polarization direction Polarization direction Laue

  14. Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension Conclusion • Wide field telescope configuration: both experiments (like POLCA) and simulations suggest that with a thick (5-10 mm) CdTe/CZT pixel (few mm2) detector modulation factor up to 0.5 can be achieved in the range 100-500 keV. These results allow to predict that an MDP at level of 1-2% can be obtained with 500 cm2 in about 30 h exposure for a 100 mCrab source flux. • Gamma ray lens configuration: the implementation of the laue lens technique can provide an improvement in sensitivity of about 2 order of magnitude with respect to current hard X and soft gamma ray telescope. A polarimeter in the focal plane of this kind of telescope can attain unprecedented performance: e.g. with a collecting area of 300 cm2 and 10 m focal length MDP ≈ 0.2% can be achieved in 30 hr exposure for a 100 mCrab source flux. Both mission configuration can be evisaged for the next decades, the choice depending on the scienfitic requirements and objectives E. Caroli, INAF/IASF-Sezione di Bologna

More Related