1 / 3

PIP PRIA II Categories with SAPs

This document outlines the criteria for Scientific Advisory Panels (SAPs) under the PRIA II framework, based on FIFRA sections 25(d) and (e). It highlights novel, non-peer-reviewed scientific issues that may necessitate SAPs, including new pesticide active ingredients and innovative uses such as biotech crops. Additionally, it discusses the budgeting process for SAPs, which typically spans 5-6 months, and clarifies that not all new PIP issues will require an SAP. Important considerations on billing, discretionary refunds, and case-by-case recovery of time are also addressed.

mateja
Télécharger la présentation

PIP PRIA II Categories with SAPs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PIP PRIA II Categories with SAPs

  2. Criteria for SAPs • FIFRA section 25 (d), (e) • Novel, non-peer reviewed scientific issues • Examples: • New PIP active ingredients • New uses (i.e. new biotech crops) • IRM paradigm shifts (e.g. natural refuge for Bt cotton)

  3. PRIA II SAP Coding • PRIA II budgets 5-6 months for SAPs • Not all new PIP issues require an SAP! • What happens if I was billed for an SAP, but BPPD determines that one isn’t necessary? • No PRIA reclassification of pending actions • Discretionary refunds • Time recovery? (case-by-case)

More Related