1 / 15

Rhythms of the Brain Tuesday, November 30, 2010 Timothy Leonard

Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses Cardin et al., 2009 . Rhythms of the Brain Tuesday, November 30, 2010 Timothy Leonard. Background/Theory. The gamma cycle ( Fries, Nikolic , & Singer, 2007 )

max
Télécharger la présentation

Rhythms of the Brain Tuesday, November 30, 2010 Timothy Leonard

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responsesCardin et al., 2009 Rhythms of the Brain Tuesday, November 30, 2010 Timothy Leonard

  2. Background/Theory The gamma cycle (Fries, Nikolic, & Singer, 2007) • rhythmic network inhibition interacts with excitatory input to pyramidal cells • amplitude values converted into phase values • in the gamma cycle more excited cells fire earlier • Functional Consequences • enables fast processing and readout • ‘winner take all’ algorithm • coincidence detection, rather than rate integration

  3. 1) The process is as follows: • Big Picture: After excitatory input, the network of inhibitoryinterneurons generates rhythmic synchronized activity and imposes rhythmic inhibition onto the entire local network. • Pyramidal cells will be able to respond to excitatory input only during the time window of fading inhibition. • Pyramidal cells provide the major excitatory drive to the interneurons • interneurons discharge with some phase delay relative to the pyramidal cells • resulting network inhibition terminates the firing of both the pyramidal cells and the interneurons. • The whole network is inhibited and the next gamma cycle starts anew. • Taken from Fries, Nikolic, & Singer, 2007 ^ area is important for next slide

  4. 2)Conversion of excitatory drive into relative spike timing • If all pyramidal cells receive a similar amount of phasic inhibition •  pyramidal cells receiving the strongest excitatory drive will fire first during the phase of the cycle  Recoding Excitatory Drive into Relative Spike Timing Level of Inhibition Excitatory Drive Time +++++ + +++ Early in phase, Inhibition at highest

  5. Summary • rhythmic network inhibition interacts with excitatory input to pyramidal cells • amplitude values converted into phase values • in the gamma cycle more excited cells fire earlier

  6. Investigating the Gamma Oscillation with Optogenetics • Cardin et al. 2009 – an overview • Tested barrel cortex in mice in vivo • processes information from the rodent whiskers • Primary sensory area (S1) • Detailed & orderly, equivalent to fingers on the hand – high acuity • Light-driven activation of interneurons & pyramidal neurons. • Electrophysiological recordings • Relevant Findings • Integral role of fast spiking interneurons in gamma oscillations • Evidence of amplitude to spike timing recoding

  7. OptogeneticsBrief • Light-sensitive ChR2 • activated by ~470 nm blue light • Interneurons • targeted to FS-PV+ interneurons • Fast Spiking • Parvalbumin expressed only in IN • Excitatory neurons • Targeted to αCamKII • Expressed only in EX • ChR2: bacteriorhodopsinChlamydomonas • reinhardtii channelrhodopsin-2 ( • FS-PV+: parvalbumin-positive fast-spiking • ChR2-mCherry: AAV DIO ChR2-mCherry

  8. Findings

  9. Fast Spike activation generatesgammaoscillations There should be a selective peak in LFP when FS cells are driven in the gamma range. • 20-80 Hz (optical stimulation) of FS cells resulted in significant amplification of LFP power in that same frequency band • 8-24 (optical stimulation) Hz activation of RS cells resulted in significant amplification of LFP power in that same frequency band • Gamma by FS - lower frequencies by RS • no effect on LFP power when • FS cells at 8 Hz (optical stimulation) • RS stimulation at 40 Hz (optical stimulation) And LFP band

  10. Natural gamma oscillations require FS activity • Single light pulses during epochs of natural and evoked gamma Shifted the phase of gamma oscillations that were • spontaneously occurring • evoked by midbrain reticular formation stimulation • activation by the light pulse significantly increased the duration of the ongoing gamma cycle • Oscillations largely eliminated by blocking AMPA and NMDA receptors despitehigh levels of evoked FS • FS stimulation during naturally occurring gamma • Increased duration of the ongoing gamma cycle • Stimulation of the midbrainreticular formation (RF) led to increased gamma activity • light pulse was given during an ongoing gamma oscillation • prolonging the ongoing gamma cycle and shifting the phase of the following cyclesrelative to the pre-light oscillation

  11. Evoked gamma phase regulates sensory processing • Timing of whisker-induced RS action potentials relative to light-evoked inhibition and the gamma cycle had a significant impact on • Amplitude • Timing • precision of the sensory-evoked responses of RS cells • Synaptic inputs arriving at peak of inhibition • Should have diminished response • Inputs arriving at the opposite phase in gamma • Should have large response. To test : • Stimulated FS cells at 40 Hz to establish gamma • recorded the responses of RS cells to a single whisker deflection • Deflection presented at one of five phases relative to a single gamma cycle

  12. Evoked gamma phase regulates sensory processing • Gamma oscillations decreased the amplitude of the RS sensory response at three phase points • consistent with the enhanced level of overall inhibition in this state • Precision of sensory-evoked spikes was significantly enhanced in a gamma-phase dependent manner

  13. Conclusions • Data directly support the fast-spiking-gamma hypothesis • Provides the first causal evidence that distinct network activity states can be induced in vivo by cell-type-specific activation • first causal demonstration of cortical oscillations induced by cell-type-specific activation • Demonstrates gated sensory processing in a temporally specific manner

  14. References Cardin, J. A., Carlen, M., Meletis, K., Knoblich, U., Zhang, F., Deisseroth, K., et al. (2009). Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature, 459(7247), 663-667. Fries, P., Nikolic, D., & Singer, W. (2007). The gamma cycle. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(7), 309-316.

  15. OptogeneticsMore Detail • ChR2: bacteriorhodopsinChlamydomonas • reinhardtii channelrhodopsin-2 ( • FS-PV+: parvalbumin-positive fast-spiking • ChR2-mCherry: AAV DIO ChR2-mCherry • Light-sensitive ChR2 • Cre-dependent expression of ChR2 • ChR2-mCherry • activated by ~470 nm blue light • Interneurons • targeted to FS-PV+ interneurons • Fast Spiking • Parvalbumin expressed only in IN • Injected into PV-Cre knock-in mice • PV-Cre/FS mice • Excitatory neurons • Injected into αCamKII-Cre mice • inducing recombination in excitatory neurons • αCamKII-Cre/RS mice

More Related