300 likes | 406 Vues
This report details the test beam results for the CASTOR forward calorimeter, presented at the CERN meeting on December 4, 2008. It covers the introduction of the CASTOR calorimeter, an analysis of the 2008 test beam, and includes discussions on pedestal stability, energy linearity, and resolution. Notably, the CASTOR calorimeter, which employs quartz and tungsten materials, plays a significant role in observing shower developments and exploring phenomena such as centauros and Higgs measurements. Results indicate a stable pedestal, linear calorimeter response, and a good energy resolution.
E N D
2008 Test Beam Results For CASTOR Semiray GIRGIS CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY CERNTR meeting December 4,2008
1- Introduction • The CASTOR forward calorimeter 2- The 2008 test beam analysis • Pedestal analysis • Energy scan • Surface scan 3 -Conclusions
Sampling calorimeter active material: quartz plates (Q) absorber material: tungsten plates (W) 16 semi-octants around the beam pipe Each semi-octant: 2 em and 12 hadronic channels (Readout Units (RU)) Castor Calorimeter
CASTOR Calorimeter Total 224 channel Stage II Stage I
We need CASTOR because of... To watch the shower development and investigate the nature of exotic objects like “ Centauros” To contribute Diffraction and low-x physics To support the Higgs measurements (higher acceptance of the CMS detector) Centauros are rare cosmic events with a very high hadronic fraction.
We can measure particleswith CASTOR... Relativistic particles hit the detector They cause a cone of light (due to the Cherenkov effect) Light is collected and transported via light guides The signal is amplified with photomultipliers
PEDESTAL STABILITY Prototypes –2008Test Beam Results
Energy linearity and resolution with electron Prototypes – 2008 Test Beam Results
The formula of energy resolution is;σ/E = a/(E) ½ + b/E + cWhere, Sigma (σ) shows bias at average energy, “E” is mean energy, “a” is for changes in number of primer particles, “b” is noise term, “c” symbolizes setting faults.
Beam profile 10GeV 200GeV
For 48514 runs mv.cut For the muon veto cut I selected point between two peaks. s. s.
Scintillator Cut 10GeV(48514 ) 20GeV(48582)
Scintillator cut50GeV(48593) 200GeV(48655)
For these runs fit (EMT+HAD1) 10GeV(48514) 50GeV(48593)
After all cut Linearity&Resolutionσ/E = a/(E) ½ + b/E + c a= p1 ,b= p2 , c=p0 EMTotal+Had1 Linearty EMTotal+Had1 Resolution response Sigma/mean
Energy linearity and resolution with pion Prototypes – 2008 Test Beam Results
Surface scan with pion Prototypes – 2008 Test Beam Results
80GeV Pion beams were used for x-scan with pion Energy value of pion runs=80GeVY(mm)=0.0Events=50.000
Beam profiles for run 48495 Figure a)Beam profile for run 48495 WOcut Figure b)Beam profile for run48495 WC(1mm) For the position scan runs with pions, the beam profile for each point was subdivided into a number
Mean responses and response derivatives (Saleve) In TB07 note sigma:6.2mm pion @80 GeV
Conclusions • Pedestals for each channel are stable. • The calorimeter response is found to be linear • The calorimeter shows a good energy resolution. • Hadronic shower width is found 6.7mm.