150 likes | 247 Vues
KEK Beam Test Results Resistive Foil. Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Philippines KEK, TUAT Tokyo Univ., Hiroshima Univ., Kogakuin Univ., Kinki Univ., Saga Univ., Tsukuba Univ., Japan MSU, Philippines , Carleton Univ.of Ottawa,Univ. de Montréal, Canada ,
E N D
KEK Beam Test Results Resistive Foil Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Philippines KEK, TUAT Tokyo Univ., Hiroshima Univ., Kogakuin Univ., Kinki Univ., Saga Univ., Tsukuba Univ., Japan MSU, Philippines, Carleton Univ.of Ottawa,Univ. de Montréal, Canada, MPI, Germany, DAPNIA-CEA, Saclay, IN2P3-LAL and IPN, Orsay, France Dan Burke 20/12/05
Outline • Resolution results for ArIso and CO2 • Bias results • Residual vs. X • PRF • Drift Velocity
Resolution σ0 = 104 +/- 3 μm Neff = 41 +/- 12 μm row 7
Resolution – multiple rows together Resolution [mm] Drift Distance [mm]
Resolution σ0 = 87 +/- 3 μm Neff = 30 +/- 5 μm row 7
Resolution – multiple rows together Resolution [mm] Drift Distance [mm]
Resolution Resolution [mm] σ0 = 108 +/- 5 μm Neff = 34 +/- 10 μm Drift Distance [mm] row 7
Resolution – multiple rows together Resolution [mm] Drift Distance [mm]
Bias bias not corrected for
Residual vs. X-track (1T) no large edge effects
Pad Response Function (1T) Amplitude Distance (mm) Not yet fitted for, some difficulties with paw fits
Pad Response Function (1T) Amplitude Distance (mm) Not yet fitted for, some difficulties with paw fits
Average amplitude vs. Row # Amplitude 6-9% variation in amplitude for inner rows
Conclusion • Resolution results consistent for ArIso and CO2 • More bias studies • PRF needs to be fitted properly, more time with PAW • Drift velocity calculations accurate and agree with magboltz