320 likes | 472 Vues
This study explores the microscale deformation and failure mechanics of diamond-shaped NiTi components under multiaxial loading through X-ray microdiffraction techniques. Aimed at improving design models, the research provides insights into the phase transformation from austenite to martensite and the mechanisms beyond traditional continuum mechanics. Key findings reveal local strain patterns, the evolution of martensite, and unexpected fracture locations, contributing to an increase in fatigue life. The implications of these findings enhance our understanding of NiTi behavior in biomedical applications.
E N D
X-Ray Microdiffraction on Diamond-shaped NiTi for Biomedical Applications Apurva Mehta SSRL/ SLAC, Stanford University Valentina Imbeni SEM X International Congress
New Boss SEM X International Congress
Collaborators • Valentina Imbeni – SRI • Brad Boyce – Sandia Labs • Nobumichi Tamura – LBL • Xiao-Yan Gong, Alan Pelton, & Tom Duerig – NDC • Rob Ritchie’s Group (Scott Robertson, Monica Barney) – LBL/ UC Berkeley SEM X International Congress
fractures In vivo loading Motivation:Macroscopic --- Microscopic • Understanding of Deformation and Failure of NiTi components at Local Level under Multiaxial Loading. • Validation of Design Models. • Towards Improved Models that include: • Austenite to Martensitic Phase Transition • Mechanics Beyond Continuum Mechanics. SEM X International Congress
MotivationE.g., understanding Fatigue Tests Location of Fracture Increase of Fatigue Life Above 1.5% Strain !! A. Pelton et. al. - NDC SEM X International Congress
Talk Outline • What did we do? • Methodology • What did we find? • Diamond in Compression • Diamond in Compression Cycling • Diamond in Tension • Five “New” Insights SEM X International Congress
compression Tension MethodologyLoad Cell X-ray Beam • Nitinol Tube 4.67mm OD with 0.38mm wall • Laser machined • Fully Annealed – Grains ~ 20-100 microns FEA Simulations SEM X International Congress
MethodologyX-ray Microdiffraction Bend Magnet Source (250x40mm) CCD camera 4 Crystal Si(111) Monochromator 1:1 Toroidal mirror 1:1 image at slits Elevation view Sample on scanning XY stage Plan view Horizontal focusing K-B mirror Vertical focusing K-B mirror Schematic layout of the X-ray Microdiffraction Beamline (7.3.3.) at the ALS Beam size on sample: 0.8x0.8 mm2 Photon energy range: 5-14 keV SEM X International Congress
10 mm MethodologyX-ray Microdiffraction-1 micron spot • Ni & Ti Fluorescence • Austenite Diff. Pattern Grain Map Elastic Strain Plastic Strain NiTi Diffraction Patterns SEM X International Congress
Deviatioric Dilational Strain Tensor From Laue Patterns deviations (broad bandpass (White) X-rays) From energy scan (Variably Monochromated X-rays) Strain Tensors In crystal reference frame In Sample reference frame + Crystal Orientation From Laue Patterns SEM X International Congress
Displacement Strain SEM X International Congress
Findings SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 0 mm : F = 0 N eyy exx SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 0.5 mm : F = -0.393 N eyy exx SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 1.0 mm : F = -0.747 N eyy exx SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 1.5 mm : F = -1.080 N eyy exx SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 2.5 mm : F = -1.465 N eyy exx SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 3.7 mm : F = -1.543 N eyy exx SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 3.7 mm : F = -1.543 N Austenite Martensite eyy Phase Map SEM X International Congress
Insight #1 Finite Elem. Analysis Microdiffraction X. –Y. Gong et al. 3.7 mm compression Qualitative agreement with FEA But – Granular and Speckled SEM X International Congress
Martensite Austenite Aust + Mart 2 phase region Transformation strain @ const. Stress s 1.5% Molar vol ~ strain Insight #2 • Local Strain Never exceeds 1.5 % • NiTi Superelastic because the Aust. And Mart. Elastic region separated by a large region of Transformation Strain SEM X International Congress
Austenite 1.5% Molar vol ~ strain Insight #3 • Strain relief on transformation • Strain reversal Nucleation energy SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 2.5 mm unload : F = -1.037 N eyy exx SEM X International Congress
CompressionD = 0.0 mm unload : F = +0.282 N eyy exx SEM X International Congress
Load Cycling @3.7 mm One Cycles 3.7- 0- 3.7 mm Eleven Cycles 4.9 – 2.5 - 3.7 mm Zero Cycles 0 – 3.7 mm SEM X International Congress
Insight #4 • On cycling Martensitic region grows. • Growth Pattern unpredictable from FEA • Strain relief as Martensite grows • Explanation for increased Fatigue Life for macroscopic strains > 1.5 % SEM X International Congress
Tension : eyy SEM X International Congress
Insight #5 • Transformation front and hence stress “hotspot” changes direction, and traverses down the stem of the diamond. • Failure occurs when the “hotspot” encounters a defect or weakness in the material. Location of failure maybe different from FEA prediction. SEM X International Congress
Summary • Insights: • Strain map granular, martensite evolution speckled. • In the superelstic region max stress doesn’t exceed stress corresponding to 1.5% Austenite strain. • Strain relief and strain reversal at the transformation front. • On load cycling, the martensite region grows. Overall stress drops. • Transformation and max stress front changes directions. • Further Questions: • What is the crystallographic relationship between the Martenite and the Austenite phase? • What happens around a crack tip? SEM X International Congress
Crystallographic Relationships SEM X International Congress
Thanks ! SEM X International Congress