1 / 10

WASC Process: An Update

WASC Process: An Update. August 19, 2008 Greg Crawford, Chair HSU WASC Steering Committee. WASC/HSU Timeline (Spring 2008 Convocation). WASC Institutional Review Cycle (in years).

melanie-rosales
Télécharger la présentation

WASC Process: An Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WASC Process: An Update August 19, 2008 Greg Crawford, Chair HSU WASC Steering Committee

  2. WASC/HSU Timeline (Spring 2008 Convocation) WASC Institutional Review Cycle (in years) -0.5 0 2 3 10 We were here

  3. WASC/HSU Timeline (Today) New WASC Institutional Review Cycle (in years) -0.5 0 2 3.5 10 Now we’re here

  4. Key WASC Feedback(Letter from Ralph Wolff, President/Executive Director, WASC, to President Richmond, June 25, 2008) • They expect substantial progress in: • Outcomes assessment (university, major programs, GE) • Use of data • culture of evidence • Improve decision making (e.g., strategic planning) • “Making Excellence Inclusive” initiative • Establishment of priorities • Alignment of resources with priorities • Effective decision-making processes to support priorities

  5. Key WASC Feedback, Continued(Letter from Ralph Wolff, President/Executive Director, WASC, to President Richmond, June 25, 2008) • “The Standards of Accreditation place special emphasis on student learning and on the obligation of institutions to assess student learning and identify ways to improve it. HSU has a history of beginning such efforts but failing to sustain them.” • “Assessment should also be used to support the success of students from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds ….”

  6. Status: Assessment of The Seven HSU Learning Outcomes (LO’s) • New coordinator position: Dr. Judith Little • LO: Effective oral/written communication • Fall ’07: data collection (GWPE) • Spring ‘08: task force recommendations to Senate • LO: Expanded world perspective • Spring ‘08: data collection (GWPE) • Aug. 25: analysis • Fall ‘08: interpret results, develop plans • Three more LO’s (to be determined): • Fall ‘08: data collection (GWPE)

  7. Status: Making Excellence Inclusive • New part-time coordinator position (Aug. 2008): Dr. Llyn Smith • Goals: • student body reflects the diversity of California high school graduates • retention and graduation rates meet or exceed CSU averages, with no gaps by ethnicity • Program Assessment: • AY 2006-2007: Pilot study • 14 programs: self-analysis (strengths, weaknesses; identification of at least two activities) • AY 2007-2008 • Recruitment / retention / graduation data: broad dissemination • Voluntary “call-to-arms” • AY 2008-2009 (planned): • Follow-up with pilot study programs (what to do next) • 6 new programs identified to start in Fall 2008; 6 more in Spring 2009

  8. Some Challenges to Resolve • Coherence among institutional, program, and GE outcomes • Integration of “inclusive excellence” outcomes at multiple levels • Embedding assessment in the curriculum and co-curriculum

  9. Tasks and Rough Timeline

  10. For more information: www.humboldt.edu/~wasc

More Related