1 / 19

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Mine Action Jan 17 th , 2012

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Mine Action Jan 17 th , 2012. CHF Sector Priorities.

mercia
Télécharger la présentation

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Mine Action Jan 17 th , 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sudan CHF 2012 1st Round Sector Defense Sector: Mine Action Jan 17th , 2012

  2. CHF Sector Priorities 1. Facilitating free and safe movement for humanitarian operations through clearance of landmines and explosive remnants of war, and continuous strengthening of the national counterparts and local implementing partners. 2. Reduce the risk of death and injury from landmines and ERWs and facilitate the reintegration of victims through targeted mine risk education and victim assistance interventions, with an emphasis on capacity building.

  3. CHF Geographical Priorities:

  4. Sector Strategy for Addressing the Mine Action Sector Priorities Value for Money $$$

  5. Supporting the Mine Action Sector’s Priority Needs

  6. The Need for Mine Risk Education in SK South Kordofan has had about three times (71) as many accidents in 2011 than in the previous five years combined (24). The increased movement of people fleeing the conflict have made them even more vulnerable to mine and ERW accidents.

  7. The Need for Mine Risk Education in SK South Kordofan has had about three times (71) as many accidents in 2011 than in the previous five years combined (24). The increased movement of people fleeing the conflict have made them even more vulnerable to mine and ERW accidents.

  8. The Need for Mine Risk Education in BNS Blue Nile State was almost completely cleared of mines. However the recent outbreak of conflict has put the population at-risk once again.

  9. The Need for Survey and Clearance in the East In Sudan, the Eastern States have had the highest total number of accidents throughout the years. While the Eastern States have less accidents than in the previous year due to the committed mine action operations by the NDUs, it remains a high priority because it still has 84 open suspected hazards and hazardous areas.

  10. The Need for Victim Assistance Victim Assistance not only helps a specific group of individuals but it has a long-lasting positive impact on families, communities, and the development of the country as a whole.

  11. Why is CHF funding critical right now to meet these sector priorities? What would happen without funding for 6 months? • Higher risk for mine/ERW related accidents. • B. Free and safe movement and socio-economic development would be severely restricted. • C. National Demining Units would have to stop clearance operations, losing important capacity development. • D. Without funding for 6 months, victims and their families will face potential financial hardships leading to extreme poverty.

  12. Targeted Estimated Number of Beneficiaries

  13. How were value for money and low indirect costs ensured? • Timeliness • B. Appropriate to the need • C. Quality of the Proposal • D. Cost-Effectiveness • E. Gap analysis

  14. Summary of TRG-endorsed proposals Total Recommended Sector Envelope: 1,439,743 USD (6 Projects) Total requested amount: 4,086,713 USD Total TRG-recommended amount: 1,439,743 USD Total submitted projects: 15 Total recommended projects: 6 Recommended UN/NGO/NNGO percentage: UN: 28% INGO: 25% NNGO: 47%

  15. Summary of TRG-endorsed proposals Total Recommended Sector Envelope versus historical trend or basis for envelope (USD)

  16. Summary of TRG-endorsed proposals Approach to determining project allocation amounts Based on experience, does the budget accurately reflect the costs of this type of mine action project? Does the project contain low indirect costs? Is it possible to decrease the costs in a way in which it does not harm the viability of the project and it still has high value for money? Consensus between TRG members determined the final allocations

  17. Summary of TRG-endorsed proposals

More Related