1 / 25

How Might Orographic Precipitation Respond to Global Warming?

How Might Orographic Precipitation Respond to Global Warming?. Study with a Simple Model of Mid-latitude Orographic Precipitation. Xiaoming Shi. Outline. Background and Motivation Simple Model of Orographic Precipitation Numerical Experiments Conclusion. Moisture.

mika
Télécharger la présentation

How Might Orographic Precipitation Respond to Global Warming?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How Might Orographic Precipitation Respond to Global Warming? Study with a Simple Model of Mid-latitude Orographic Precipitation Xiaoming Shi

  2. Outline • Background and Motivation • Simple Model of Orographic Precipitation • Numerical Experiments • Conclusion

  3. Moisture • Models tend to maintain a fixed relative humidity (RH) as they warm. • Then Clausius-Clapeyron equation implies moisture will increase at 7%/K (CC Scaling). (Held & Soden 2006; Allan & Soden 2008)

  4. Precipitation • ~ 2%/K, result from energy constraints. (Allen & Ingram, 2002; Takahashi 2009; O’Gorman et al, 2011) From O’Gorman et al, 2011

  5. Precipitation • The energetic constraints can’t determine regional precipitation. • Mid-latitude precipitation may increase at different rate. • Orographic precipitation ?

  6. Orographic Precipitation • Central part of the interaction between the land surface and the atmosphere. • Important for ecosystems and management of human water resources. (Roe 2005 and references therein)

  7. Parcel Model (Kirshbaum & Smith 2008; Alpert 1986) • Assumptions: • Airflow parallel to terrain at all levels; • Exponential decrease of saturation vapor density; • Flow impinging on mountains is saturated. • Condensation rate of one level:

  8. Parcel Model • Assuming α is constant: (or ) • Precipitation: • Moisture flux determines orographic precipitation in this simple model.

  9. Experiments • GFDL atmosphere and land model (AM2-LM2)

  10. Experiments • Bottom Boundary: LM2 + Slab Ocean (Frierson et al, 2006). • Resolution: 2olatitude × 2.5o longitude, 24 levels • Constant concentration of CO2, O3, CH4 … • Orographic Precipitation feeds back on dynamics by latent heating and radiation.

  11. Experiments • AM: Atmosphere Modeling, NO orographic precipitation, CO2 ~ 330ppm. • AM2CO2: … , CO2~ 660ppm. • AMO: having orographic precipitation, CO2 ~ 330ppm • AMO2CO2: … , CO2 ~ 660ppm

  12. Experiments • Run for 16 years. Data of last 8 years are usedfor averaging.

  13. Temperature • Orographic precipitation can suppress warming. Mean Temperature Unit: K

  14. Moisture • Clausius-Clapeyron Scaling.

  15. Precipitation AM AMO

  16. Precipitation • Island precipitation increases at rate ofCC scaling. • The increase of pure orographic precipitation is 9.3%/K.

  17. Orographic Precipitation • Increase of Orographic Precipitation: 9.3%/K (Drop eddy flux term, )

  18. Orographic Precipitation 9.3%/K 2.4%/K 7.5%/K • Change of wind speed will enhance the increase of orographic precipitation. • (In AM & AM2CO2, wind increased 0.5%/K)

  19. Conclusion • Wind above mountains may increase in global warming. • Together with increase of moisture, it would make orographic precipitation increase faster than 7%/K. • Hypothesis: • Stationary Thermal forcing caused by orographic precipitation can increase wind speed. • Latent heating + IR cooling

  20. References Allen, M. R. & W. J. Ingram, 2002: Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature419, 224-232, doi:10.1038/nature01092s Allan, R. P., B. J. Soden, 2008: Atmospheric Warming and the Amplification of Precipitation Extremes. Science321, 1481 Alpert P. 1986. Mesoscale indexing of the distribution of orographic precipitation over high mountains. J. Appl. Meteorol. 25: 532–545. Frierson, Dargan M. W., Isaac M. Held, Pablo Zurita-Gotor, 2006: A Gray-Radiation Aquaplanet Moist GCM. Part I: Static Stability and Eddy Scale. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2548–2566. doi: 10.1175/JAS3753.1 Held, Isaac M., Brian J. Soden, 2006: Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming. J. Climate, 19, 5686–5699. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3990.1 Kirshbaum, D. J., and R. B. Smith, 2008: Temperature and moist- stability effects on midlatitude orographic precipitation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1183–1199. O'Gorman, P. A., Allan, R. P., Byrne, M. P. & Previdi, M. 2011: 
Energetic constraints on precipitation under climate change, Surveys in Geophysics (Submitted) Roe, G. H. 2005: Orographic Precipitation. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2005. 33:645–71 doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122541 Takahashi K, 2009: Radiative constraints on the hydrological cycle in an idealized radiative-convective equilibrium model. J AtmosSci 66:77–91

  21. Moisture • Clausius-Clapeyron Scaling. Column Integrated Water Vapor Unit: kg/m2

  22. ΔP in simulation without orographic precipitation.

  23. Precipitation • Orographic Precipitation can obey CC scaling. Mean Precipitation Unit: mm/day

  24. Orographic Precipitation • Increase of Orographic Precipitation: 9.3%/K

More Related