1 / 12

Fractal tools for the analysis of star-forming regions

Fractal tools for the analysis of star-forming regions. Néstor Sánchez Emilio J. Alfaro Enrique Pérez Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Graná , Spain. V Workshop "Estallidos", Granada, 2007. Introduction / Motivation. ↑. Star formation process. Initial conditions: ISM structure

minnie
Télécharger la présentation

Fractal tools for the analysis of star-forming regions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fractal tools for the analysisof star-forming regions Néstor Sánchez Emilio J. Alfaro Enrique Pérez Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, Graná , Spain V Workshop "Estallidos", Granada, 2007

  2. Introduction / Motivation ↑ Star formation process. Initial conditions: ISM structure Objective/Systematic ISM characterization ISM structure vs environmental variables Our approach: ISM topology Fractal dimension (Df): degree of complexity (smoothness or clumpyness) of the ISM ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑

  3. Fractal dimension estimators F ~ xDf Perimeter-area: P ~ ADper/2 Mass-radius: M ~ rDm Correlation integral: C ~ rDc Simulated Fractal Clouds Df=2.3 Df=2.6

  4. Factors affecting theestimation of Df: • Opacity • Noise • Proyection effects • Image resolution 2D: Df_calcu < Df_theor Dper = Dper(Df,Npix) (Sanchez, Alfaro, Perez, ApJ, 2005)

  5. Factors affecting theestimation of Df: • Opacity • Noise • Proyection effects • Image resolution tau_0 = 0 tau_0 = 1 tau_0 = 2 (Sanchez, Alfaro, Perez, ApJ, 2007)

  6. Factors affecting theestimation of Df: • Opacity • Noise • Proyection effects • Image resolution Dper ≠ Dper(tau) (Sanchez, Alfaro, Perez, ApJ, 2007)

  7. Factors affecting theestimation of Df: • Opacity • Noise • Proyection effects • Image resolution Contrast = I(max)/s.d.(background) Recipe: Smooth the image to maximizing the contrast (taken from Vogelaar & Wakker 1994) Dper_opt = Dper(max. cont.)

  8. Application to emission maps Ophiuchus, Perseus (COMPLETE, Ridge et al. 2006) Orion (Nobeyama, Tatematsu et al. 1993) 13CO maps

  9. Application to emission maps (Sanchez, Alfaro, Perez, ApJ, 2007) Df = 2.7 +/- 0.1 Df ~ 2.6 is roughly consistent with average observed properties (Sanchez, Alfaro, Perez, ApJ, 2006)

  10. New-born stars • Df(ISM) ---> Df (star distribution) • Application to the Gould Belt (closest star formation complex): GB LGD Blue = O-B3 Red = B4-B6

  11. Df - Gould Belt GB-early: Df = 2.68 +/- 0.04 GB-late: Df = 2.85 +/- 0.04 LGD-early: Df = 2.89 +/- 0.06 LGD-late: Df = 2.84 +/- 0.06 (Sanchez et al. 2007, in preparation)

  12. Conclusions • Well-defined fractal clouds were simulated, various Df estimators analyzed, and different effects quantified by using "good" (modesty aside) algorithms. • Fractal analysis is a "reliable" tool for analysing both ISM (gas) structure and star distribution. • Df(ISM) ≈ 2.7 +/- 0.1 (> 2.3) (universal?) • Df GB-early = 2.68 +/- 0.04 (stars ↔ ISM?) • Df GB-late = 2.85 +/- 0.04 (Df increase with time?) • In the very, very near future (tomorrow?): distribution of star forming regions in galaxies, stars in clusters, etc.

More Related