1 / 6

Conference conclusions

Conference conclusions. - Collaboration initiative for sustainable regional Arctic development ARC-NET. Possible strategic objectives. Utility

misty
Télécharger la présentation

Conference conclusions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conference conclusions - Collaboration initiative for sustainable regional Arctic development ARC-NET

  2. Possible strategic objectives • Utility • to enhance the relevance of territorial cooperation for individuals and communities in the Arctic and near-Arctic (e.g. ownership, engagement, capacity) • Efficiency • to improve the management and delivery of territorial cooperation intervention (e.g. coherence, integration, targeting of activities/support; learning and adaptation) • Effectiveness • to increase the impact and added-value of projects and programmes (what works, what doesn’t)

  3. Possible activities Information sharing and knowledge exchange among programme stakeholders (where is there scope for cooperation?) • Programming; common Arctic-related themes and priorities (where are shared interests) and linking policy and strategies to people • Project generation: form and timing of project calls and mobilisation of applicants (e.g. animation and brokerage, avoiding competition, maximising added value, ensuring integration, involving communities) • Project appraisal and selection: appraisal processes and selection criteria (e.g. taking account of lessons, promoting synergies, responding to unpredictability and variability of Arctic development, maximising community benefit) • Project follow-up and support: facilitating cross-programme links across clusters of projects, supporting sustainability and legacy of projects (including post-project advice for beneficiaries) • Monitoring and evaluation: sharing methodologies and information on outcomes of projects (what works, esp. for communities)

  4. Possible activities Other forms of capacity building • Information and intelligence on the environment – horizon scanning (physical, political, policy,…..), and accessibility of information • learning – supporting the development of a learning culture (systems, tools, human resources)

  5. Possible structure Form has to follow function – what model would best facilitate the activities? Conference discussions: • interest in establishing a network for regional collaboration (reinforcing earlier discussions) • multi-nodal proposed – better than a single node? • Norwegian proposal for a key node in Tromsø; other nodes being discussed • thematic or functional focus (foci) – which? • complementarity with other initiatives (e.g. proposed EU Arctic Information Centre)

  6. Next steps Further work needed: • clarification of specific option(s) for structure, functions and resources  concrete proposal • consultation among governments and other stakeholders • consultation with the Commission and EEAS • consultation with established cooperation frameworks and platforms in the area

More Related