1 / 23

Observations of AXPs and SGRs: 1E 1048.1-5937 and SGR 1806-20

Palermo, 2003 October 14 th. Observations of AXPs and SGRs: 1E 1048.1-5937 and SGR 1806-20. Andrea Tiengo (IASF-MI, Univ. Milano) S. Mereghetti, G. L. Israel, L. Stella, S. Zane, A. Treves, G. Ramsay, M. Feroci, R. Turolla, M. Cropper. Gamma-Ray Bursts. X-Ray Pulsars.

mizell
Télécharger la présentation

Observations of AXPs and SGRs: 1E 1048.1-5937 and SGR 1806-20

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Palermo, 2003 October 14th Observations of AXPs and SGRs:1E 1048.1-5937 and SGR 1806-20 Andrea Tiengo (IASF-MI, Univ. Milano) S. Mereghetti, G. L. Israel, L. Stella, S. Zane, A. Treves, G. Ramsay, M. Feroci, R. Turolla, M. Cropper

  2. Gamma-Ray Bursts X-Ray Pulsars • Soft burst spectrum • Repetition of bursts from same position • Period 5-12 s and spin-down • No bright optical counterpart • Soft spectrum and stable flux Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters& Anomalous X-ray Pulsars SGRsAXPs Identified as subclass of: But then discovery of: • AXP-like counterparts • SGR-like bursts SGRs and AXPs are the same class of objects! Interpretations: Magnetar or NS accreting from fall-back disc

  3. Guaranteed Time observation of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 1E 1048.1-5937 5 ks observation performed on 28 Dec 2000 Results(Tiengo, Göhler, Staubert & Mereghetti 2002): • Power-law (=3) + Blackbody (kT=0.65 keV) • No narrow features in EPIC spectrum

  4. Guaranteed Time observation of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 1E 1048.1-5937 5 ks observation performed on 28 Dec 2000 Results(Tiengo, Göhler, Staubert & Mereghetti 2002): • Power-law (=3) + Blackbody (kT=0.65 keV) • No narrow features in EPIC spectrum • Flux within 50% from previous observations (SAX, ASCA)

  5. SAX ASCA XMM

  6. Guaranteed Time observation of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 1E 1048.1-5937 5 ks observation performed on 28 Dec 2000 Results(Tiengo, Göhler, Staubert & Mereghetti 2002): • Power-law (=3) + Blackbody (kT=0.65 keV) • No narrow features in EPIC spectrum • Flux within 50% from previous observations (SAX, ASCA) • Energy dependent pulse profile: pulsed fraction 75% for E<1.5 keV and 100% for E>1.5keV

  7. Guest Observer (AO2)observation of 1E 1048-593 70 ks (43 ks with low bkg) observation in June 2003 • Same spectrum as GT observation • No narrow features in EPIC and RGS spectra

  8. Guest Observer observation of 1E 1048-593 70 ks (43 ks with low bkg) observation in June 2003 • Same spectrum as GT observation • No narrow features in EPIC and RGS spectra BUT: • Flux a factor 2 higher than in GT observation

  9. XMM GO SAX ASCA XMM GT Gavriil, Kaspi & Woods (2002) reported bursts from 1E1048.1-5937 in Nov 2001

  10. Guest Observer observation of 1E 1048-593 70 ks (43 ks with low bkg) observation in June 2003 • Same spectrum as GT observation • No narrow features in EPIC and RGS spectra BUT • Flux a factor 2 higher than in GT observation • Lower pulsed fraction: 50%

  11. Pulse profiles GT observation GO observation

  12. The new AXP XTE J1810-297 • New AXP (P = 5.54 s) discovered by RXTE in Aug 03 (Ibrahim et al. 2003) • From Einstein, ROSAT and ASCA archival data: it was ~100 times fainter! (Gotthelf et al. 2003) XTE J1810-297 is a Transient AXP • XMM ToO on Sep 8 (Tiengo & Mereghetti 2003, ATEL 193; Gotthelf et al. 2003, astro-ph/0309745): XTE J1810-297 is very similar to 1E 1048.1-5937

  13. Spectrum XTE J1810-297 1E 1048.1-5937 (GO data) NH= 1.05  0.05 x 1022 cm–2 Γ= 3.7  0.2 kT= 0.67  0.01 keV F2-10 keV = 3 x 10-11 erg cm–2 s–1 NH= 1.14  0.01 x 1022 cm–2 Γ= 3.40  0.03 kT= 0.64  0.01 keV F2-10 keV = 10-11 erg cm–2 s–1

  14. Pulse profiles XTE J1810-297 1E 1048.1-5937 (GO data)

  15. GO (AO2) observation of SGR 1806-20 30 ks observation in April 2003 but only 5 ks with low bkg Results: • Powerlaw spectrum (Γ=1.6, NH=6x1022 cm-2); no BB component • No narrow features in EPIC spectrum

  16. GO (AO2) observation of SGR 1806-20 30 ks observation but only 5 ks with low bkg Results: • Powerlaw spectrum (no BB component) • No narrow features in EPIC spectrum • 1 burst detected (2-10 keV fluence 10-9 erg cm-2)

  17. GO (AO2) observation of SGR 1806-20 30 ks observation but only 5 ks with low bkg Results: • Powerlaw spectrum (no BB component) • No narrow features in EPIC spectrum • 1 burst detected (2-10 keV fluence 10-9 erg cm-2) 20 ks obs. performed on 7 Oct and 50 ks accepted in AO-3

  18. CONCLUSIONS: • The flux of 1E 1048.1+5937 is confirmed to be variable (more than a factor 2) • First evidence for variation in pulsed fraction of • 1E 1048.1-5937 (from 90% to 50%) • 1E 1048.1-5937 is very similar to the “transient AXP” XTE J1810-297 • AXPs are more variable than previously thought! Are these variations related to bursts, as in SGRs? AXP 1E 2259+586 became 1 order of magnitude brighter and changed pulse profile after bursts (Kaspi et al. 2003)

More Related