SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Logical Fallacies

mohammad-wilder avatar
23 diapositives · 1.3K Views · Nov 21, 2014

Logical Fallacies. Don’t ruin your argument with them . …Here are 18 (of many). Logical argument structure. Premise 1: A = B Premise 2: B = C Conclusion: A = C Logical fallacies occur when premises aren’t reasonable or conclusions use unsound reasoning. Ad hominem. “To the man”

Logical Fallacies - slide 1
01 / 23Logical Fallacies
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Logical Fallacies
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Logical Fallacies Don’t ruin your argument with them. …Here are 18 (of many)

  2. Logical argument structure • Premise 1: A = B • Premise 2: B = C • Conclusion: A = C • Logical fallacies occur when premises aren’t reasonable or conclusions use unsound reasoning.

  3. Ad hominem • “To the man” • Attacking your opponent’s personal traits instead of the content of their argument.

  4. Ad ignorantium • “To ignorance” • Stating something to be true simply because we cannot prove that it ISN’T true. Image source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/9653499/UFO-enthusiasts-admit-the-truth-may-not-be-out-there-after-all.html

  5. Anecdotal Evidence • Basing conclusions on personal experiences instead of empirical evidence. Image: http://thedailyomnivore.net/2013/01/16/anecdotal-evidence/

  6. Appeal to Emotion • The manipulation of emotional responses instead of basing arguments on sound logic. http://pubcakes.com/blog/think-of-the-children

  7. Argument from authority • Arguing that if an authority says something, its veracity is beyond doubt. http://www.funnyjunk.com/North+korea+master+race/funny-pictures/5218566/

  8. Begging the question • Circular reasoning; using personal assumptions as sound logic • Interviewer: "Your resume looks impressive but I need another reference." • Bill: "Jill can give me a good reference." • Interviewer: "Good. But how do I know that Jill is trustworthy?" • Bill: “I can vouch for her." http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/begging-the-question.html

  9. Burden of Proof • Rather than proving that your claim is true, this fallacy puts the onus on your opponent to prove it is false. http://theosophical.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/bertrand-russell-and-the-celestial-teapot/

  10. False Dichotomy • Alternatives are inaccurately limited to one of two choices. http://badquaker.com/archives/2914

  11. Inconsistency • Arguments contradict each other. • A > B, B > C, C > A http://alltheragefaces.com/face/misc-jackie-chan

  12. Loaded Question • Building acceptance of the answer into a question. http://www.nashvillecriminallawreport.com/articles/what-it-takes-to-be-a-great-cr/

  13. Moving Goalposts • Explaining gaps in logic of an argument by clinging to rationalization of the argument’s value. • See: No True Scotsman

  14. No True Scotsman • A form of moving the goalposts: doubting authenticity of counterarguments. • Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge." • Person B: "I am Scottish, and I put sugar on my porridge." • Person A: "Well, no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."

  15. Personal Incredulity • Negation of an argument due to lack of comprehension. http://modernmouseradio.com/2014/03/24/monday-memes-mike-wazowski-cant-believe-the-giant-hashtag/

  16. Post hoc ergo propter hoc • Implying causal relationship when there is none. • Equating causality with correlation.

  17. Red Herring • Focusing on a non-issue instead of the argument at hand

  18. Slippery Slope • Negating arguments with unsubstantiated conjecture of consequences. • “If we allow gays to marry, soon it will be legal to marry robots.” http://www.electrogent.com/2012/08/argue-like-a-man-understanding-logical-fallacies-part-3/

  19. Straw Man • Presenting an altered version of the opponent’s argument so that it seems absurd, then disproving the weak argument. http://badartcrit.tumblr.com/post/46325958071/how-not-to-react-to-criticism-the-strawman-reaction

  20. TuQuoique • “You too” • Equating others’ lack of reasoning as proof/justification of your own. • Opponent A: • “You accepted bribes for your campaign!” • Opponent B: • “Well, so did you!”

  21. Which fallacy? • If any aspects of evolution are not proven, creationism must be true. • I know I deserve an A in this course, especially because my grandma is sick and I’ve been working three jobs all semester. • “My doctor said Mylanta.” • “You can have a raise when you finish this project.” [project finished] “Your raise is dependent on many variables, not just that project, so you’ll have to wait.”

  22. Which fallacy? • Lying is dishonest because it is deceitful. • Obama’s presidency is making Americans dumber. 2 years after he took office, graduation rates declined. • Heroin isn’t dangerous. My friend uses it often, and he’s just fine. • If we legalize marijuana, soon children will be forced to smoke it at school.

  23. Sources • http://www.theskepticsguide.org/resources/logical-fallacies • https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ • http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/fallacies/