1 / 7

Splenda: Safe Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

By Lisa Weiss. Splenda: Safe Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?. Why Should I Question Splenda?. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s7w6UHmiDw. No calorie sweetener for coffee, tea, baking “Made from sugar so it tastes like sugar” Too good to be true?. What is Splenda?.

moira
Télécharger la présentation

Splenda: Safe Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. By Lisa Weiss Splenda: Safe Sugar Substitute or Sweet Deception?

  2. Why Should I Question Splenda? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s7w6UHmiDw • No calorie sweetener for coffee, tea, baking • “Made from sugar so it tastes like sugar” • Too good to be true?

  3. What is Splenda? http://www.d-et.com/eng/sucralose.asp • Sucralose • Discovered in 1976 • Comes from sucrose (sugar) but chlorine is substituted for three hydrogen/oxygen molecules • Not recognized by the body as a carbohydrate • 600 times sweeter than sugar

  4. How Safe is Splenda? • Over 20 years of evaluation • FDA approvals in 1998, 1999 • Approved for use in over 80 countries • Multiple studies found sucralose poorly absorbed (15%) • Only 2-3% metabolizes

  5. So What’s the Problem? • Discovered while researching pesticides • No large scale human studies • Most studies conducted by manufacturers • FDA denied approval for 10 years • Studies show up to 27% not excreted • Chlorine highly toxic if broken down • Numerous side effects in case studies • Actually does contain some calories

  6. Conclusion Trusted organizations prove Splenda is safe. Toxic chlorine may be absorbed into the body. Splenda should be used minimally, if at all.

  7. Works Cited Brusick, D , V.L. Grotz, R Slesinksi and C.L. Kruger. "The Absence Of Genotoxicity Of Sucralose." Food And Chemical Toxicology July 2010. Web. 24 Jan. 2011. <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T6P-50PCMGN-5&_user=10&_coverDate=11%2F30 2F2010&_alid=1618282925&_rdoc=7&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_zone=rslt_list_item&_cdi=503>. Grotz, V. L, Ian C. Munro. "An Overview Of The Safety Of Sucralose." Regulatory Toxicology And Pharmacology May 2009. Web. 24 Jan. 2011. <www.elsevier.com/locate/yrtph>. Mercola, Joseph and Dr. Kendra Degen Pearsal. Sweet Deception : Why Splenda, Nutrasweet, And The FDA May Be Hazardous To Your Health. Nashville, TN, USA: Nelson Books, 2006. Print. "Sucralose: Is It Safe?." Nyam News July 2005. Web. 24 Jan. 2011. <http://www.paho.org/English/CFNI/NyamnewsJuly1-205.pdf>. "What is Sucralose." All About Sucralose. Calorie Control Council, 2011. Web. 24 Jan. 2011. <http://www.sucralose.org/default.asp>. IMAGES Splenda packet: Front: http://splits59.com/blog/?p=241 Back: http://routingbyrumor.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/whats-in-that-little-blue-packet-sweet-deception-from-domino-foods-inc/

More Related