1. Adapter

3. Adapter • Convert the interface of a class into another interface clients expect. • Adapter lets classes work together that couldn't otherwise because of incompatible interfaces. • Aka: Wrapper

4. Motivation • Sometimes a toolkit class designed for reuse isn't reusable only because its interface doesn't match the domain-specific interface an application requires.

5. Adapter Solution

6. Possible Adapter Structures

7. Participants • Target (Shape) • defines the domain-specific interface that Client uses. • Client (DrawingEditor) • collaborates with objects conforming to the Target interface. • Adaptee (TextView) • defines an existing interface that needs adapting. • Adapter (TextShape) • adapts the interface of Adaptee to the Target interface.

8. Collaborations • Clients call operations on an Adapter instance. In turn, the adapter calls Adaptee operations that carry out the request.

9. About Identity • A decorator and its component aren't identical. • A decorator acts as a transparent enclosure. But from an object identity point of view, a decorated component is not identical to the component itself. • If the decorator is wrapping, then identity of the object may change. • Good at construction time, but else should “adapt” the references from the decorated to the decorator.

10. Consequences • More flexibility than static inheritance. Dynamic addition of properties • Avoids feature-laden classes high up in the hierarchy. • Lots of little objects.

11. Implementation • Interface conformance. A decorator object's interface must conform to the interface of the component it decorates. ConcreteDecorator classes must therefore inherit from a common class (at least in C++). • Omitting the abstract Decorator class. There's no need to define an abstract Decorator class when you only need to add one responsibility. • Keeping Component classes lightweight. Component should specify an interface, decorators are then easier to define

12. Wrapping or not? Conforming or not • With decorator • With strategies

13. Strategies? • Strategies are a better choice when the Component class is heavyweight, thereby making the Decorator pattern too costly to apply. • The Strategy-based approach might require modifying the component to accommodate new extensions. • - a strategy can have its own specialized interface, • - a decorator's interface must conform to the component's. • A strategy needs only define the interface for rendering a border, which means that the strategy can be lightweight even if the Component class is heavyweight.

14. Known Uses • VisualWorks Wrapper hierarchy • Stream Decorators in VisualWorks: • BOSSTransporter is a stream decorator • FormattedStream is a stream decorator